44PG179 (Site Name Keyword)

DOCUMENT Full-Text Antony F. Opperman. Luther D. A. Hanson.

An archaeological inventory was conducted by MAAR Associates. Inc. at Fort Lee, Prince George County. Virginia. This study resulted in the identification of 99 prehistoric and historic sites. A total of 3609 acres was examined constituting a 66.7 percent sample of the facility including all area undisturbed by recent military activity. Initial projections of the resource base were largely confirmed, and the use of an environmentally-based sampling strategy was found to be justified. This...

PROJECT Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District. Ronald A. Thomas.

An archaeological inventory was conducted by MAAR Associates. Inc. at Fort Lee, Prince George County. Virginia. This study resulted in the identification of 99 prehistoric and historic sites. A total of 3609 acres was examined constituting a 66.7 percent sample of the facility including all area undisturbed by recent military activity. Initial projections of the resource base were largely confirmed, and the use of an environmentally-based sampling strategy was found to be justified. This...

PROJECT Ronald A. Thomas.

A total of 17 archeological evaluations of significance were completed as part of an ongoing program of cultural resource management at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluations were conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations In situations where planned development projects would adversely affect identified archeological resources. Of the 17 properties evaluated during this study, six were classified as significant and for...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Antony F. Opperman. Harding Polk II.

A total of 17 archeological evaluations of significance were completed as part of an ongoing program of cultural resource management at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluations were conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations In situations where planned development projects would adversely affect identified archeological resources. Of the 17 properties evaluated during this study, six were classified as significant and for...

DATASET Fort Lee Regional Archaeological Curation Facility. Donald K. Creveling. H Polk II. Kim Jones Lukezic. Antony F. Opperman. L. W. McKee. C. Thomas.

Aritfact catalog for the archaeological inventory that was conducted by MAAR Associates. Inc. at Fort Lee, Prince George County. Virginia. This study resulted in the identification of 99 prehistoric and historic sites. A total of 3609 acres was examined constituting a 66.7 percent sample of the facility including all area undisturbed by recent military activity. Initial projections of the resource base were largely confirmed, and the use of an environmentally-based sampling strategy was found to...

DATASET MAAR Associates, Inc.. Antony F. Opperman. Donald K. Creveling.

Catalog of artifacts from Archaeological Evaluations of Significance at Fort Lee. A total of 17 archeological evaluations of significance were completed as part of an ongoing program of cultural resource management at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluations were conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations In situations where planned development projects would adversely affect identified archeological resources. Of the...

DATASET H. Polk.

Catalog of artifacts excavated at sites 44PG179 and 44PG243 located at Fort Lee, Virginia.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gray & Pape, Inc..

This resource contains the artifact catalog for the National Register supplemental archaeological investigations of seven archaeological sites at Fort Lee, Virginia. The seven sites include: 44PG169, 44PG176, 44PG179, 44PG182, 44PG183, 44PG260, and 44PG278.

DOCUMENT Full-Text MAAR Associates, Inc..

This document consists of a letter acknowledging the delivery of artifacts recovered by MAAR Associates, Inc. during Phase II archaeological investigations at Fort Lee in the fall of 1988. Accompanying the letter is an artifact inventory of the delivered artifacts. The archaeological sites involved are both 44PG179 and 44PG243.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gray & Pape, Inc..

This report presents the results of additional archaeological investigations of seven archaeological sites during September and October 1997 at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. This investigation was conducted by Gray & Pape, Inc., of Richmond, Virginia, for Environmental Reconstruction Company, Inc., of Fredericksburg, Virginia, pursuant to a scope of services prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Norfolk District and under contract DACA65-95-D-0 ll6. The additional...

PROJECT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Norfolk District. Len Winter.

Additional archaeological investigations were conducted on seven archaeological sites identified and recommended as eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places by MAAR Associates, Inc. Based on the additional investigations conducted by Gray & Pape, Inc., the following archaeological sites are recommended as not meeting the criteria of eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places: 44PG179, a multicomponent site, and 44PG278, a 1917 surface trash...

PROJECT Uploaded by: system user

During the latter part of October 1988, MAAR Associates, Inc. (MAI) conducted field work for the remedial archaeological investigations of sites 44PG179 and 44PG243 located at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. The investigations consisted of both on-site archaeological excavations and additional historical research which were conducted in order to assess the results of disturbance impacts caused by earth-moving activity at the two sites. The following report presents the findings of the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harding Polk II.

Archaeological investigations were conducted at two previously recorded sites at Fort Lee (44PG179 and 44PG243) by MAAR Associates, Inc. (MAI) for the Norfolk District of the Army Corps of Engineers. The investigations were performed as a result of surface disturbances from unauthorized heavy equipment activity in order to determine if these disturbances impacted any potential cultural resources. Other than the initial inventory survey, site 44PG243 has never been subjected to archaeological...