Using Multi-Proxy Evidence to Evaluate Captive Animal Management in the Prehistoric Caribbean

Summary

For some time archaeologists have speculated that non-native mammals introduced to the prehistoric Caribbean may have been managed in captivity, but direct evidence for this practice has been wanting. The question of management is complicated by ambiguous and conflicting data from ethnohistory, animal behaviour, and archaeology, as well as potentially unwarranted assumptions about human interaction with synanthropic animals. I examine this issue for introduced agouti (Dasyprocta sp.) and opossum (Didelphis marsupialis) in the pre-Columbian Lesser Antilles, using multi-proxy evidence to evaluate their potential captive management. Data from dental eruption sequences, rates of epiphyseal fusion, and stable C, N, Pb and Sr isotopes are employed to examine the cultural role of agouti and opossum and potential management strategies employed by Amerindians. These data provide baselines for addressing the impact of introduced agouti and opossum on fragile island environments and potential incipient domestication in the Pre-Columbian era.

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

• Where the Wild Things Are Not: Human-Animal Interaction in the Space between Wild and Domestic   •
• Society for American Archaeology 82nd Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC (2017)

Keywords

Spatial Coverage

Record Identifiers

Abstract Id(s): 15750