Section 106 (Other Keyword)
51-75 (98 Records)
The Maryland Historical Trust Project Review Form requesting comments concerning the demolition of buildings 1539 and 1558, a Consolidated Communications Center at Joint Base Andrews. The reviewer determined that the project will have no effect on historic properties.
Maryland Historic Trust Project Review Form for the Demolition of Buildings 3602, 3605, 3808, and 3603 at Joint Base Andrews (2017)
The Maryland Historical Trust Project Review Form requesting comments concerning the demolition of buildings 3602, 3605, 3808, and 3603 at Joint Base Andrews. The reviewer determined that the project will have no effect on historic properties.
Maryland Historical Trust Communication Regarding Multiple Projects at Joint Base Andrews (2013)
Response from the Maryland Historical Trust (MDSHPO) regarding the Determinations of Eligibility on eleven project proposals at Joint Base Andrews. The Maryland Historical Trust confirms that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed projects.
Mattawoman Energy Center Project, Charles and Prince George's County, Maryland (2017)
Maryland State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurrence confirming there are no adverse effects caused by the Mattawoman Energy Center Project as found in the provided Phase I results.
Methodology: U.S. Army Alaska 2006 Range Developments Section 106 Archaeological Inventory and Evaluation Fort Richardson and Fort Wainwright (2006)
U.S. Army Alaska planned to survey several past inventoried archaeological sites during the 2006 summer field season. The focus of this work would involve: 1) the survey of firing fans associated with training ranges on Fort Wainwright's Yukon and Donelly Training Areas, 2). Evaluations to determine eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places of archaeological sites that may be impacted by future development on the Donnelly Training Area, and 3). Numerous smaller...
Mitigating the Sacred? Examining the Role of Native American Associative Values in Resolving Adverse Effect (2015)
Under federal historic preservation legislation, mitigating adverse effects to archaeological sites commonly involves treating the site as a materialistic entity from which scientific information about the past is retrieved through systematic data recovery. Native American associative values associated with archaeological sites that view these places as sacred because they are home of ancestors that exhibit physical affirmations of oral histories and collective cultural identities are rarely...
Models for Anthropological Practice and For Training Practitioners (1985)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Navy Program Comment for the Disposition of Historic Vessels (2010)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation issued a Program Comment for the Department of the Navy setting forth the way in which it will comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act with regard to the determination of National Register of Historic Places eligibility of its vessels and the treatment of adverse effects that may result from their disposition. Executed - December 10, 2010; Expiration - December 10, 2020.
A New View of the Desert - The Permian Basin Programmatic Agreement Research Program in Southeastern New Mexico (2015)
The research program described in this paper is providing much needed new information for a portion of southeastern New Mexico that was previously understudied. The program is funded by an innovative approach to Section 106 compliance which trades redundant survey information for monetary contributions to a dedicated research account. The Permian Basin Programmatic Agreement (PA) has been in effect for six years. The purpose of the PA (formerly the Permian Basin Memorandum of Agreement or MOA)...
Potentially Eligible Properties for the Cold War Era, Andrews Air Force Base (1993)
Correspondence concerning the state and national historic eligibility status of thirty-nine buildings at Andrews Air Force Base.
Pragmatism in Practice: Advocacy, ethics, and impediments in compliance (2016)
The practice of “compliance archaeology” within existing structures requires practitioners to constantly weigh ideals against practicalities. What we think should be done, and how, is often limited by shortfalls in budgets, labor, time, and access. It is evident that few cultural resource stewards or managers have the resources they need to sufficiently address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, much less compliance with any other legislation, guideline,...
Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization (PAR) Program at Joint Base Andrews - Naval Air Facility Prince George's Country, Maryland Section 106 Review - USAF (2016)
The Maryland Historic Trust (MDSHPO) comments concerning the Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization (PAR) Program at Joint Base Andrews, determining no historic properties or archaeological sites eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in the Area of Potential Effect (APE).
Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California SHPO, and the California Dept of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section 106 (2001)
Programmatic Agreement regarding compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA as it pertains to the Federal-Aid Highway Program in California.
Proposed Rehabilitation of Belle Chance Section 106 Review, Andrews Air Force Base, Prince George’s County, Maryland (2002)
Response from the Maryland Historic Trust (MD SHPO) concurring that the proposed rehabilitation project at the Belle Chance property will produce no adverse effects to the historic structure.
Public Engagement and Compliance Archaeology in a Museum Setting (2015)
Public engagement in compliance archaeology is inherent in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act as well as many state historic preservation ordinances. Engagement in publically funded projects allows those who pay for the research to share in the project results but also provide information as stakeholders of the past. Although such regulations provide for public engagement, the process and type of involvement varies by project, geographic area, and archaeological resource. This...
Randolph Air Force Base Project Metadata
Project metadata for resources within the Randolph Air Force Base cultural heritage resources collection.
Renovation of Chapel 2 Andrews Air Force Base (1987)
Correspondence between the Maryland Historical Trust, the Advisory Council On Historic Preservation, and Andrews Air Force Base concerning the proposed renovation of Chapel 2 (Chapel II) located at Andrews Air Force Base. Includes a completed Maryland Historical Trust State Historic Sites Inventory Form with pictures of the historic property.
Report on Field Investigations in the Big Spring Developed Area in Advance of Installation of a Buried Power Cable to Serve Building 420, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Carter, Missouri (2002)
During a thunderstorm on Thursday, July 26, 2001, a major lightning strike hit near Big Spring causing a major power outage to the maintenance buildings and other structures to the south of the Big Spring discharge branch. All major lines were replaced following that event but recently the buried cable that serves Building 420 failed and must be replaced. James E. Price was instructed to provide Section 106 Clearance for the project and fieldwork ensued which is reported herein. The Big...
Revised Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) For the Disposition of Belle Chance Residence and Outbuildings Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland (2005)
Response from the Maryland Historic Trust (MD SHPO) concerning their review of the document, 'Revised Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) For the Disposition of Belle Chance Residence and Outbuildings Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland'. The Maryland Historic Trust offers their "comments and serious concerns" with the proposed alterations to historic properties at Andrews Air Force Base, and strongly recommends alternatives to demolition.
Role of Cultural Resources Management in a Changing Legislative Environment (1988)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Section 106 @ Fifty – A Look Back and A Glimpse Ahead (2016)
My first job in cultural resource management was in 1976, the American bicentennial. While I thus missed the first decade of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 106, I have been actively engaged since. The first fifty years of Section 106 resulted in profound changes to the field of archaeology. From the growth of the cultural resource industry and private sector cultural resource management firms; to NAGPRA and the treatment of human remains; to the creation of Tribal Historic...
Section 106 Contributions to Urban Archaeology: What Was Lost is Now Found (2016)
When improvements were proposed for the Whitehurst Freeway in Washington, DC, existing conditions would not have recommended this heavily urbanized project area for a research-oriented archaeological investigation. The area was traversed by elevated freeway ramps and major roadways. As well, it had been the site of a 20th century school and 19th and 20th century industrial use. Yet, because of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, archaeological investigations led to the...
Section 106 Mitigation in Memoradum of Agreements: A View From the Corps (2017)
What constitutes acceptable Section 106 mitigation to resolve adverse effects under the National Historic Preservation Act? Stipulations in a Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) need to be enforceable, with sufficient specificity and accountability for an Agency to monitor compliance. Are there limits to what is possible in Stipulations in Section 106 MOAs? This paper uses examples from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Regulatory Program-permitted projects to explore the concept and...
Section 106 Review for Effects of Special Project RC1-89 (Shore Protection) (1995)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
SHPO Correspondence Regarding Chapel 2 (Building 3715) Repairs, Andrews Air Force Base (2009)
Correspondence from the Maryland Historic Trust (MD SHPO) to Andrews Air Force Base with recommendations to avoid or mitigate adverse effects from the proposed project to repair Chapel 2.