Late Archaic (Temporal Keyword)
101-125 (441 Records)
add description
83. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1038 E1005 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
84. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1038 E1006 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
85. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1039 E1005 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
86. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1039 E1006 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
87. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1040 E1005 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
88. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1040 E1006 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
89. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1050 E1011 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
9. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_Feature 9 Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
9. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N983 E971 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
9. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_Transit Log.pdf (2021)
add description
90. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1051 E1009 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
91. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1051 E1010 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
92. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1051 E1011 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
93. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_N1059 E1018 Unit Level Forms & Maps.pdf (2021)
add description
A. CAS.2021.120_TAC Permit 8723_Summary of Materials Submitted.doc (2021)
add description
Additional Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Lost Grove Lake Project, Including Phase II Investigations at Site 13st155, Scott County, Iowa. (2001)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Analysis and Report of Collections for the Newcomb Site (12CL2) in Clark County, Indiana (2018)
This report constitutes Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc.’s analysis of a portion of cultural materials from the Newcomb Site (12Cl2) near the city of Clarksville in Clark County, Indiana. The materials were recovered by Amec Earth & Environmental, Inc., in 2004 and identified in a collapsed portion of Emery Lane and the riverbank of the Ohio River. The analysis, report writing, and laboratory processing of the material remains were conducted at the request of Jay Jani of ECS-GEC JV on behalf of...
An Archaeological and Historical Survey of Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia: Final Report and Appendices (1985)
An archaeological inventory was conducted by MAAR Associates. Inc. at Fort Lee, Prince George County. Virginia. This study resulted in the identification of 99 prehistoric and historic sites. A total of 3609 acres was examined constituting a 66.7 percent sample of the facility including all area undisturbed by recent military activity. Initial projections of the resource base were largely confirmed, and the use of an environmentally-based sampling strategy was found to be justified. This...
Archaeological and Historical Survey of the Lake Thonotosassa By-Pass Canal Right-of-Way in Hillsborough County, Florida (1976)
This report summarizes the findings of an archaeological and historical survey conducted for the Southwest Florida Water Management District to assess the cultural resources on land that will be impacted by the construction of the Lake Thonotosassa By-Pass Canal. Field investigation of this tract, which measured approximately ten square miles, occurred during November, 1976. Both the fieldwork and preparation of this final report were accomplished under the supervision of Dr, J. Raymond...
An Archaeological and Historical Survey, Fort Lee (FL1985.001)
An archaeological inventory was conducted by MAAR Associates. Inc. at Fort Lee, Prince George County. Virginia. This study resulted in the identification of 99 prehistoric and historic sites. A total of 3609 acres was examined constituting a 66.7 percent sample of the facility including all area undisturbed by recent military activity. Initial projections of the resource base were largely confirmed, and the use of an environmentally-based sampling strategy was found to be justified. This...
An Archaeological Assessment of a Proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility within the Estill County Water District, Estill County, Kentucky. Revised Report (1987)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Archaeological Collections Management: From Shoeboxes to Computer Systems (1997)
Proper collections management is crucial to archaeology. Recent trends in conservation archaeology recognize the nonrenewable nature of archaeological sites and highlight the research potential of existing archaeological collections.
An Archaeological Collections Summary for Fort Dix, New Jersey (1995)
The U.S. Army Environmental Center (AEC) tasked the Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections (MCX) with the job of assisting Army installation personnel in complying with the requirements of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (P.L. 101-601, NAGPRA). The MCX was asked to locate and assess archaeological collections derived from Army-owned lands, to identify the federally recognized Native American tribes most likely...
Archaeological Evaluations of Significance, Fort Lee (FL1987.001)
A total of 17 archeological evaluations of significance were completed as part of an ongoing program of cultural resource management at Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluations were conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations In situations where planned development projects would adversely affect identified archeological resources. Of the 17 properties evaluated during this study, six were classified as significant and for...