PaleoIndian (Culture Keyword)

IMAGE Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Ball State University.

Diagnostic biface, Catalog #: COADS_14-133 Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey, Department of Anthropology, University of Akron and Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University. Diagnostic biface, Catalog #: COADS_14-147 Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey, Department of Anthropology, University of Akron and Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University.

IMAGE Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Ball State University.

Diagnostic Biface, Catalog #: COADS_16-6 Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey, Department of Anthropology, University of Akron and Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University. Diagnostic Biface, Catalog #: COADS_16-8 Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey, Department of Anthropology, University of Akron and Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University

DOCUMENT Citation Only John L. Fagan.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Full-Text David M. Plaza.

Archaeology is faced with the inheritance problem of managing legacy collections, partly due to the high expense of maintaining them. Often these datasets are unorganized, thus rendering them underutilized, and difficult to properly preserve or to integrate into the current archaeological dialogue. Unfortunately, this problem is a common issue. To address this problem, an examination of the condition of the records and artifacts of legacy archaeological collections is needed. In this thesis,...

DOCUMENT Citation Only Albert Ernest Jenks.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Citation Only Larry J. Schmits.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Citation Only J. S. Dunbar. B. I. Waller.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Citation Only J. S. Dunbar. B. I. Waller.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

Biface staging follows Callahan (1979) with the addition of the following half stages: 2.5 and 3.5. A Stage 4 biface preform is considered Late Stage. Biface fragments were too incomplete to be staged.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

"Debris" tabulates whole and broken flakes and pieces of shatter. "Core Fragments" are larger chunks of chert greater than 2.5 cm x 2 cm x 2 cm.

DOCUMENT Full-Text William Engelbrecht.

This document contains 5 GIS distribution maps generated by Roderick Salisbury. Broken Triangular Drills, Drill Bases, Key Drills (broken + whole), Whole Key Drills, and Micro-drills.

DOCUMENT Full-Text William Engelbrecht.

Six GIS distribution maps of drills from the Eaton site: bases pf rod-shaped drills, whole rod-shaped drills, T-drills, drill tips (class 5 = base missing, class 7 = only tip), drill tips (only class 7), whole triangular drills. These were generated by Roderick Salisbury.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

This distribution map includes specimens that might be classified as drills, awls, gravers, reamers, or burins. Specimens may be broken or whole. Most specimens are bifacial or unifacially flaked, but a few are utilized flakes showing use wear on a projection.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

Distribution of utilized flakes and utilized fragments. Fragments are defined as chunks of chert larger than 2.5 cm x 2 cm x 2 cm.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

This shows the distribution of fire altered rock on the Eaton Site. It is tabulated in kilograms.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

Distribution of both whole and broken knives. ""Total Knives" combines whole and broken knives into a single distribution.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

Shows the distribution of pipe fragments on the site.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

These are Madison (Iroquoian) points and point fragments.

IMAGE William Engelbrecht.

Notches (spokeshaves) include bifacial and unifacial specimens along with utilized flakes; all characterized by having a notch. Also shown: the distribution of whole endscrapers and broken endscrapers. Broken endscrapers are generally represented by the end with steep retouch. Broken and whole endscraper tabulations are combined in the distribution "Total Endscrapers." The scraper and broken scraper categories encompass a variety of shapes and sizes, but all exhibit use wear. The distribution...

IMAGE Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Ball State University.

Early Archaic Kirk Corner Notched, Catalog #: Do-621 A Virtual Window on the Dawn of Indiana Archaeology: Digitizing the Dolan Collection, The Syracuse-Wawasee Historical Museum, Inc. (SWHM) [Funded by an Indiana Heritage Support Grant], Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University.

SENSORY DATA Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Ball State University.

Unidentified, Catalog #: Do-659 A Virtual Window on the Dawn of Indiana Archaeology: Digitizing the Dolan Collection, The Syracuse-Wawasee Historical Museum, Inc. (SWHM) [Funded by an Indiana Heritage Support Grant], Applied Anthropology Laboratories, Department of Anthropology, Ball State University.

DOCUMENT Citation Only David A. McLean. M. R. Sellon.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Full-Text William Engelbrecht.

The Eaton project contains data from 17 seasons of excavation from the Eaton Site in West Seneca, NY. This document is an explanation of Levels 1-4 and “Extras” of 5 Eaton Access Tables for the tDAR dataset 6031.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ralph J. Hartley. Anne Wolley Vawser. Alan R. Smith. Mary A. Johnson.

In 1988 and 1989 comprehensive documentation of twenty-two rock art sites in Dinosaur National Monument was undertaken to establish baseline information for the long-term monitoring of these sites. Procedures used included still photography, scale drawings, video photography, photogrammetry, and standardized written descriptions. Documentation for each site was compiled in a notebook format for use by park personnel during monitoring phases. Analyses of the rock art and the kinds of...

PROJECT Uploaded by: Paul Green

Between January and June 1995 crews from the Public Service Archaeology Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, the University of South Carolina, conducted a Phase I archaeological survey of 7,500 acres at Poinsett Weapons Range, Sumter County, South Carolina for the United States Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories. The investigations were designed to produce a complete inventory of archaeological...