USA (Country) (Geographic Keyword)
30,626-30,650 (35,822 Records)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 102 concerning proposed internal and external renovations including replacement of original doors, roof, down spouts, and gutters. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Antonio Matos, Internal Renovation Building 110, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 110. After reviewing the proposed design changes it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district. This letter provides the conditions that must be met in order for the project to move forward.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Antonio Matos, Internal Renovation Buildings 110 and 120, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2009)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Buildings 110 and 120. After reviewing the scope of work for internal renovation it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district, as long as the listed conditions are met.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Curtis Tunnell, Handicap Access Ramp Building 598, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
Randolph Air Force base has reviewed the subject letter and recommendations from the Texas Historical Commission concerning the addition of a handicapped access ramp to Building 598. The construction drawing is included as an attachment to the correspondence.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Dwight Micklethwait, Building 900 Interior Restoration, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 900 for a proposed interior restoration. IT was determined that the property wis listed on the National Register of Historic Places and that an undertaking does exist and will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to James Cipollone, Generators Louvers Building 497, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 497 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the proposed project concerning the generators louvers will have no adverse effect on the surrounding historic property and district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Jerry Wieters, Internal Renovation Building 399, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
An evaluation was conducted on Building 399, Randolph Air Force Base, TX. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and if guidelines and recommendations are followed the proposed project of an internal renovation will have no adverse effect on the property and its historic district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Jerry Wieters, Window and Frame Repair Northwest Side Hangar 76, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
This letter details an evaluation conducted on Hangar 76 by the Cultural Resources Manager of the Department of the Air Force's Air Education and Training Command. After reviewing the current scope of work and discussions of the proposed project, the Texas State Historic Preservation Office determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the landmark district.Included in this letter are required conditions in order for the undertaking to proceed.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Jessica Villarreal, Copper Gutters Building 499, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 499 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the proposed project concerning the building's copper catch box will have no adverse effect on the landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Jessica Villarreal, Internal Renovation Building 237, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation of Building 237 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on the historic property and its landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Jessica Villarreal, Window Railings Building 499, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 499 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places.It was also determined the action, not to install window railings, will have no adverse effect on the landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Katy Breyer, Chandelier for Building 241, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
This group of correspondence addresses work order 80032 for the repair of a historic chandelier in Building 241 at Randolph Air Force Base.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Kevin Meyer, Remove Window Hardware Building 300, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
An evaluation was conducted on Building 300 and it was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the proposed undertaking to remove window hardware will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Kevin Myer, External Windows Design Building 500, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 500 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the proposed work schedule and past discussions, it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Kevin Myer, Internal Renovation Building 500 Parr Officer's Club, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 500, the Parr Officer's Club, and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on the landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Kymberli Willstrop, External Renovation Building 300 South Fence Infill, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
An evaluation was conducted on Building 300 by Randolph Air Force Base. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and that the proposed project to in-fill the south fence will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Norbert Chavez, Internal Renovation Building 237, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2012)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 237. After reviewing the scope of work, it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district. This letter provides necessary conditions in order for the determination to stand.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Rolando Gonzales, Memorandum from Internal Renovation Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2009)
An evaluation was conducted concerning an internal renovation for Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. After reviewing the scope of work, it was determined that the proposed action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property. This correspondence details the conditions to be met in order for the project to move forward.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Rolando Gonzalez, Internal Renovation Building 581, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 581 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was also determined that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on the property or its landmark district.
Response from Scott Shepherd to Thomas Moore, Internal Renovation Building 120, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation of Building 120. After reviewing the proposed design for internal renovation, it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district as long as the listed condition is met.
Response from Sharon Fleming and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Window Rehabilitation at Building 2792 Headquarters Building, Army Health Services, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1995)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston plans and specifications for window rehabilitation at Building 2792. The Commission concurs with the determination that this work will have "no adverse effect" on the historic resource.
Response from Sharon Fleming to Brian Miller, Installation of Fence Building 418, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
This letter is the Texas Historical Commission's response to information sent documenting Randolph Air Force Base's proposal for fence installation for Building 418. After reviewing the material the Commission concurs with the determination of no adverse effect on the historic building or the surrounding area.
Response from Sharon Fleming to David Brigham, Building 250 Barracks Replacement, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1998)
This letter is the Texas Historical Commission's follow-up to Fort Sam Houston's fax regarding the design of Building 250, Barracks Replacement. It includes Fort Sam Houston comments and the consultant's response. The letter details the Commission's understanding of the proposed revisions to the 100% complete documents.
Response from Sharon Fleming to John Brenneman, Landscape Master Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1995)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston a copy of the "Landscape Master Plan." The Plan is a model planning project which combines historic preservation with other important concerns such as water conservation. This letter details comments and concerns of the Commission concerning the project. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from Stan Graves and James Steely to Claudia Nissley, Revisions to the Fort Sam Houston Programmatic Agreement, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation forwarded to the Texas Historical Commission and State Historic Preservation Office a draft copy of the revised Programmatic Agreement for Fort Sam Houston. While the Commission agrees that it is necessary to eliminate references to the National Conservation District in favor of clarification of NHL district boundaries, this letter offers some recommendations on the wording of these stipulations. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger...