Fort Sam Houston Conservation District (Geographic Keyword)
1-21 (21 Records)
This ICRMP has been developed in accordance with the revised guidelines for Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32–7065 (June 2004), Cultural Resources Management Program, and is designed to serve as a management plan for fiscal years (FY) 2015–2019. Although not a decision-making document, this ICRMP provides the Commander, and those responsible for implementing the Commander’s decisions, with the necessary information regarding the treatment of cultural resources at JBSA. Reference to JBSA in this...
Joint Base San Antonio, Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan, Volume II (2014)
This is the second volume of Joint Base San Antonio's 2014 Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan. The ICRMP has been developed in accordance with the revised guidelines for Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32–7065 (June 2004), Cultural Resources Management Program, and is designed to serve as a management plan for fiscal years (FY) 2015–2019. Although not a decision-making document, this ICRMP provides the Commander, and those responsible for implementing the Commander’s decisions, with the...
Letter from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Blood Donor Center New Design, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1991)
Documentation of multiple site meetings and brick samples for the proposed design for the new Blood Donor Center, to be located outside of the Conservation District at Fort Sam Houston.
Letter from Teresa Kinsey to John Brenneman, Siting of Recreational Equipment Building Form 1027, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
This letter supplies a signed Form 1027 for the siting of a recreational equipment building near the National Historic Conservation District. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no adverse effect" along with specific terms of agreement.
Memorandum of Agreement Between Fort Sam Houston and the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Demolition of Building 1030 Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, Signed (2002)
A partially signed agreement indicating that Fort Sam Houston has determined that the demolition of Building 1030 at Fort Sam Houston will have an adverse effect on the Fort Sam Houston Conservation District, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer pursuant to regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Phase I Existing Conditions Assessment of Building 1026, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2009)
This Existing Conditions Assessment (ECA) project was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Fort Worth District, under Contract W9126G-06-D-0400, Task Order 008, in support of Fort Sam Houston (FSH) and Camp Bullis (CB). This ECA report was prepared to support the Army Alternate Procedures (AAP) Historic Properties Component (HPC) of the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for historic buildings and Army Regulations for building reduction. The HPC has standard...
Phase I Existing Conditions Assessment of Building 325, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2009)
This Existing Conditions Assessment (ECA) project was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Fort Worth District, under Contract W9126G-06-D-0400, Task Order 008, in support of Fort Sam Houston (FSH) and Camp Bullis (CB). This ECA report was prepared to support the Army Alternate Procedures (AAP) Historic Properties Component (HPC) of the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for historic buildings and Army Regulations for building reduction. The HPC has standard...
Phase II Existing Conditions Assessment of Building 325, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2010)
This Existing Conditions Assessment (ECA) project was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Fort Worth District, under Contract W9126G-06-D-0400, Delivery Order 013, in support of Fort Sam Houston (FSH) and Camp Bullis (CB). The Phase I and Phase II ECA reports have been prepared to conform to the Army Alternate Procedures (AAP) Historic Properties Component (HPC) of the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) for historic buildings and Army Regulations for...
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank 95 Percent Plans, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed the 95% level plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston in their determination of "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has determined that the design will have "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
Response from James Bruseth to Lisa Orlando, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
This letter, written by the Texas Historical Commission, gives a brief overview of the Fort Sam Houston Property. The correspondence was written for Lisa A. Orlando, Environmental Scientist, BSA Environmental Services, Inc..
Response from Stan Graves to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
This letter was written by the Texas Historical Commission to inform Fort Sam Houston that their proposed addition to the Eisenhower National Bank will have an "Adverse Effect" to the Conservation District fronting Arthur MacArthur Field, as well as other historic properties in the area. Recommendation for a new design and other details are included in this correspondence. Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston, is carbon copied to this letter.
Response from Stan Graves to John Brenneman, Running Track, Arthur MacArthur Field, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Environmental and Natural Resources Branch at Fort Sam Houston forwarded to the Texas Historical Commission an information package on the construction of the MacArthur Field running track. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Branch Exchange and Shopette New Construction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1991)
Fort Sam Houston sent the Texas Historical Commission design information on the proposed Branch Exchange Shopette to be located on Wilson Street in the Conservation District. This letter from the Commission gives approval of the design and also details concerns about the removal of the railroad trestle bridge. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Paul McGuff, COE, and Claudia Nissley, ACHP.
Response from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Building 2789 General Modifications, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1990)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed summary documentation regarding a request by Fort Sam Houston to make several modifications to Building 2789, located in the Conservation District at Fort Sam Houston. The letter details specifications to the modification process.
Response from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Building 369 Mechanical Modifications, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1990)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission summary information regarding plans to modify HVAC system of Building 369, located in the Conservation District of Fort Sam Houston. This letter details the Commission's decision that the project will have "no adverse effect."
Response from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Priority List of Buildings to Receive New Roofs, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1991)
The Texas Historical Commission received a list from the Environmental Management Office of buildings on the Fort Sam Houston Post which are proposed to receive new roofs in the 1991 fiscal year. This letter is the Commission's feedback on each building and whether or not the project would have "no effect" for each historical structure.
Response from Stan Graves to Richard Strimel, Removal of Rail Line Trestle Bridge and New Construction of Branch Exchange Shopette (1991)
The Texas Historical Commission sent this letter to Fort Sam Houston to inform them that the rail line trestle bridge that was being considered for removal was recently determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. As a result, the propose demolition of the structure will clearly have an "adverse effect" on the structure and its environment. Carbon copied to the letter is Michael Hilger, Army Corp of Engineers and Claudia Nissley, ACHP.
Response from Teresa Kinsey to John Brenneman, Mechanical Equipment Screening Design, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
The Texas Historical Commission confirms that they have received and reviewed a proposed design for mechanical equipment screening in the National Historic Landmark District and National Conservation District. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston that the project will have "no adverse effect" on the related historic resources.
U.S. Air Force Integrated Culutral Resources Management Plan, Joint Base San Antonio (2020)
This ICRMP was developed to provide for effective management and protection of cultural resources. It summarizes the history and prehistory of the installation, and reviews past historical and archaeological survey efforts. It outlines and assigns responsibilities for the management of cultural resources, discusses related concerns, and provides standard operating procedures (SOPs) that will help to preserve the cultural resources of the installation within the context of the mission. The ICRMP...