Window Replacement (Other Keyword)

1-9 (9 Records)

Aluminum Replacement Windows with True Divided Lights, Interior Piggyback Storm Panels, and Exposed Historic Wooden Frames (1991)
DOCUMENT Citation Only Charles Parrott.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.


Correspondence with State Historic Preservation Office Concerning Window Replacement in Building 433 (Hangar 1) (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Anne E. Haaker. Andreas Rodriguez.

Correspondence between Scott Air Force Base and State Historic Preservation Office concerning window and door replacement in Building 433 (Hangar 1). State Historic Preservation Office determined no adverse effect.


Letter: Scott Air Force Base Window Replacement and Door Repair or Replacement for Building 52 (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Anne E. Haaker.

Correspondence from the Deputy Illinois State Historic Preservation Officer to Scott Air Force Base, regarding the window replacement and door repair or replacement for Building 52.


Letter: Window Replacement of Building P-4, Scott Air Force Base (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Anne E. Haaker.

Correspondence from the Deputy Illinois State Historic Preservation Officer to Scott Air Force Base, regarding the renovation of Building P-4.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Continued Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

Fort Sam Houston submitted a follow-up project review to the Texas Historical Commission for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter states that the documentation submitted is insufficient for concurrence by the Commission with Fort Sam Houston's determination.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submittal from Fort Sam Houston for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston for window replacement in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Replace Windows in Building 2376 Correction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a project review for window replacement in Building 2376. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Update on Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the updated information package submitted by Fort Sam Houston for the proposed window replacement in Building 2792. After review, the Commission has determined that the project, as currently proposed, would have an "adverse effect" on the building. The letter lists in detail the reasons for the Commission's determination.