Dining Facility (Other Keyword)
1-7 (7 Records)
Correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Texas.
Letter from Douglas Biggerstaff to Lawerence Oaks, Architectural Documentation for Proposed New Dining Facility, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
This letter, written to the Texas Historical Commission, addresses Fort Sam Houston's concerns in the project to construct a new dining facility. The project is a "fast-track" design-build contract and the reviews at 35 percent and 95 percent stipulated in the Programmatic agreement are not possible.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Building 5101, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking to demolish the building - specifically a request to incorporate the historic building into a new proposed dining facility, rather than demolish Building 5101. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Wendy Martinson, Project Review for Draft EA and FONSI for Proposed Consolidated Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
Response from Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Entrance Canopy at Building 5107 Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (1996)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans and specifications from Fort Sam Houston for a new canopy at Building 5107 which serves as a dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" on the historic resource. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Entrance Canopy at Buildings 5105, 5106 and 5124 Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (1997)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a proposal from Fort Sam Houston to construct new metal entrance canopies at Building 5105, 5106 and 5124. These properties are dining facilities at Camp Bullis. The Commission concurs with the determination that the undertaking will have "no adverse effect" on the historic buildings and lists some conditions. Copied to this correspondence is David Brigham (Cultural Resource Manager) and Mike Hilger (Historical Architect, Fort Sam...