Ranching Complex (Other Keyword)
1-4 (4 Records)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Archeological Survey at Camp Stanley Storage Activity, Bexar County, Texas (1998)
From November 1995 into early January 1996, Prewitt and Associates, Inc., conducted an archeological survey of 2,125 acres at Camp Stanley Storage Activity in Bexar County, Texas. The survey covered approximately 977 of the 1,780 acres within the Inner Cantonment, avoiding those areas of extreme disturbance by the military. The survey of the Outer Cantonment covered 1,148 acres within five designated survey parcels. A total of 34 archeological sites, consisting af20 prehistoric and 18...
Cultural Resources Investigations For the Proposed Greenhorn Annexation; City of Angels, Calaveras County, Angels Camp, California (1992)
This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Mocek, Draft Report of Archaeological Survey, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
The Texas Historical Commission has reviewed the draft report entitled "Camp Bullis Archeological and Historical Investigations, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas: The 1989 Season."They find the report to be thorough and it is agreed that the assessment of the resources, specifically of the prehistoric and historic sights, is correct concerning their inclusion or non-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.