Cline Terrace Mound Data: Decorated Ceramics from Screened Contexts

Part of the Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Cline Terrace Mound (DRAFT) project

Year: 1997

Summary

The Cline Terrace Mound Data tables provide a summary of the artifacts recovered during Arizona State University (ASU), Office of Cultural Resource Management's (OCRM) Roosevelt Platform Mound Study (RPMS) excavations at Cline Terrace Mound (AZ U:4:33, AZ U:4:132, AR-03-12-06-132). The Cline Terrace Mound table Decorated Ceramics from Screened Contexts presents a summary of decorated ceramic vessels recovered from excavated contexts that were screened.

The table lists designated archaeological contexts - strata - at the site, and then provides the frequency (count) of individual vessels assigned to different decorated ceramic types for each stratum. Note that the table presents a count of individual vessels (i.e., groups of sherds or single sherds assigned to individual vessels) identified to decorated ceramic type. More specifically, it presents a count of rim sherds that were assigned to a single vessel (The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds to determine ceramic type for individually designated vessels).

The strata represent major natural or cultural depositional events such as erosional fill, roof fall, floor contexts, and sterile substrate. Strata are depicted as horizontal rows of interconnected boxes on a Harris Matrix. Within a feature, each stratum is designated by the feature number (e.g., 10, 11, 12, etc.) and a letter that designates a particular stratum (e.g., A, B, C). The letters are assigned in descending order. Mixed levels and artifacts collected out of context are designated by a "?". Artifacts from each feature (or mixed context) are tallied according to strata. Please see column metadata for further detail. Please also see the data table "Cline Terrace Mound Data: Strata" for further data about each stratum, including the assigned stratum type, at the following tDAR url: https://core.tdar.org/dataset/394140

The Cline Mound Terrace Data tables were originally published on the Roosevelt Platform Mound Monograph Series No. 7 titled "A Salado Platform Mound on Tonto Creek, Report on the Cline Terrace Mound, Cline Terrace Complex." The tables were published in an appendix at the end of the volume. Please see the report volume at the following tDAR URL:

Cite this Record

Cline Terrace Mound Data: Decorated Ceramics from Screened Contexts. Tempe, Arizona: Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University. 1997 ( tDAR id: 394221) ; doi:10.6067/XCV8TM7D5X

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

Data Set Structure

Measurement Column
Count Column
Coded Column
Filename Column
Integration Column (has Ontology)

Table Information: ClineMound_Screened_Decorated

Column Name Data Type Type Category Coding Sheet Ontology Search
Tucson Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Miscellaneous Wares, Tucson Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Stratum Identifies a major natural or cultural depositional event such as erosional fill, roof fall, floor contexts, and sterile substrate (i.e., a single archaeological context in both horizontal and vertical space). Strata are depicted as horizontal rows of interconnected boxes on a Harris Matrix. A stratum is a combination of an individual feature and a context in or associated with that feature. For example, Feature 10 might be a structure with an erosonial fill stratum, a roof fall stratum, a floor stratum, and a sterile substrate stratum. Within each feature, each stratum is designated by the feature number (e.g., 10, 11, 12, etc.) and a letter that designates a particular stratum (e.g., A, B, C). The levels excavated in a feature were aggregated into individual feature strata (e.g., Levels 1 - 3 = Stratum A). A feature's stratum letters are assigned in descending order. A context letter of "?" designates a mixed level or context or artifacts collected out of context. Examples: 0? = General Cultural Fill/No Feature and Indeterminate context 10A = Feature 10 and Context A 10B = Feature 10 and Context B 10C = Feature 10 and Context C 22? = Feature 22 and Mixed and/or Undefined context 22A - Feature 22 and Context A Each stratum (e.g., 10C) is assigned to a stratum type. The stratum data are presented in a separate stratum data table. Please see the data table Cline Terrace Mound Data: Strata at the following tDAR url: https://core.tdar.org/dataset/394140 Examples: 10A = Feature 10 and Context A = Feature 10, erosional fill 10B = Feature 10 and Context B = Feature 10, roof fall 10C = Feature 10 and Context C = Feature 10, floor Artifacts collected from each feature are tallied according to strata. For example, artifacts collected from Feature 10 are tallied for Stratum A, Stratum B, Stratum C, etc.
VARCHAR  Uncoded Value Provenience and Context : Stratum none none true
Tonto Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Tonto Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Tularosa B/W Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Cibola White Ware, Tularosa Black-on-White. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. The Tularosa design style was used in multiple ceramic wares across the American Southwest through time. The Tularosa stylistic tradition was defined by the following characteristics (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): multiple line widths opposed solid and hatched elements where hatched elements are nearly the same width as solid elements parallel, diagonal and mixed hatching no elaboration on linework band designs are not divided into sections
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Not Recorded Frequency of individual vessels for which no ceramic ware and/or type were determined/recorded.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Tanque Verde R/brown Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Hohokam Red-on-brown, Tanque Verde Red-on-brown. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. Rather distinct Hohokam design styles were used in multiple ceramic wares in the Hohokam area through time. The Hohokam stylistic tradition was divided into three temporally-based traditions - the Hohokam Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic periods. The characteristics of the Hohokam Colonial, Hohokam Sedentary, and Hohokam Classic stylistic traditions are as follows (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): HOHOKAM COLONIAL fine line execution, good paint hatching used as background, zig–zag line hature a multitude of animal, bird, and human motifs and elements (dancing figures, burden carriers, flute players, birds (in positive & negative) reptiles, and quadrapeds) trailing lines on bowl exteriors (exterior grooving of paste) HOHOKAM SEDENTARY some what sloppy, freely–executed curvilinear motifs scrolls, linework with equlateral triangles, bumps and hatchure common small elements occur (Hohokam “alphabet” as well as circles, dots, birds, animals) Equilateral triangular areas filled w/paint have “bulls eyes” lots of paint covers design field leaving relatively small amounts of undecorated area HOHOKAM CLASSIC good to poor line execution, poor–fugitive paint possible (buffs especially) general rectilinear shape of motifs & elements complex “woven” symmetry of layout commonly truncated as band designs line work elaboration has elongated triangles pendant dots, triangles with flags, hatchure vertical hatchure separates panels of bands areas of checker boards and crosshature incorporated into whole design
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
San Carlos R/brown Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Hohokam Red-on-brown, San Carlos Red-on-brown. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. Rather distinct Hohokam design styles were used in multiple ceramic wares in the Hohokam area through time. The Hohokam stylistic tradition was divided into three temporally-based traditions - the Hohokam Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic periods. The characteristics of the Hohokam Colonial, Hohokam Sedentary, and Hohokam Classic stylistic traditions are as follows (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): HOHOKAM COLONIAL fine line execution, good paint hatching used as background, zig–zag line hature a multitude of animal, bird, and human motifs and elements (dancing figures, burden carriers, flute players, birds (in positive & negative) reptiles, and quadrapeds) trailing lines on bowl exteriors (exterior grooving of paste) HOHOKAM SEDENTARY some what sloppy, freely–executed curvilinear motifs scrolls, linework with equlateral triangles, bumps and hatchure common small elements occur (Hohokam “alphabet” as well as circles, dots, birds, animals) Equilateral triangular areas filled w/paint have “bulls eyes” lots of paint covers design field leaving relatively small amounts of undecorated area HOHOKAM CLASSIC good to poor line execution, poor–fugitive paint possible (buffs especially) general rectilinear shape of motifs & elements complex “woven” symmetry of layout commonly truncated as band designs line work elaboration has elongated triangles pendant dots, triangles with flags, hatchure vertical hatchure separates panels of bands areas of checker boards and crosshature incorporated into whole design
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Hohokam Buff Ware Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware Hohokam Red-on-buff Wares. Rim sherd stylistic elements could not be identified to a type. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. Rather distinct Hohokam design styles were used in multiple ceramic wares in the Hohokam area through time. The Hohokam stylistic tradition was divided into three temporally-based traditions - the Hohokam Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic periods. The characteristics of the Hohokam Colonial, Hohokam Sedentary, and Hohokam Classic stylistic traditions are as follows (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): HOHOKAM COLONIAL fine line execution, good paint hatching used as background, zig–zag line hature a multitude of animal, bird, and human motifs and elements (dancing figures, burden carriers, flute players, birds (in positive & negative) reptiles, and quadrapeds) trailing lines on bowl exteriors (exterior grooving of paste) HOHOKAM SEDENTARY some what sloppy, freely–executed curvilinear motifs scrolls, linework with equlateral triangles, bumps and hatchure common small elements occur (Hohokam “alphabet” as well as circles, dots, birds, animals) Equilateral triangular areas filled w/paint have “bulls eyes” lots of paint covers design field leaving relatively small amounts of undecorated area HOHOKAM CLASSIC good to poor line execution, poor–fugitive paint possible (buffs especially) general rectilinear shape of motifs & elements complex “woven” symmetry of layout commonly truncated as band designs line work elaboration has elongated triangles pendant dots, triangles with flags, hatchure vertical hatchure separates panels of bands areas of checker boards and crosshature incorporated into whole design
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Sacaton R/buff Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Hohokam Red-on-buff, Sacaton Red-on-buff. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. Rather distinct Hohokam design styles were used in multiple ceramic wares in the Hohokam area through time. The Hohokam stylistic tradition was divided into three temporally-based traditions - the Hohokam Colonial, Sedentary, and Classic periods. The characteristics of the Hohokam Colonial, Hohokam Sedentary, and Hohokam Classic stylistic traditions are as follows (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): HOHOKAM COLONIAL fine line execution, good paint hatching used as background, zig–zag line hature a multitude of animal, bird, and human motifs and elements (dancing figures, burden carriers, flute players, birds (in positive & negative) reptiles, and quadrapeds) trailing lines on bowl exteriors (exterior grooving of paste) HOHOKAM SEDENTARY some what sloppy, freely–executed curvilinear motifs scrolls, linework with equlateral triangles, bumps and hatchure common small elements occur (Hohokam “alphabet” as well as circles, dots, birds, animals) Equilateral triangular areas filled w/paint have “bulls eyes” lots of paint covers design field leaving relatively small amounts of undecorated area HOHOKAM CLASSIC good to poor line execution, poor–fugitive paint possible (buffs especially) general rectilinear shape of motifs & elements complex “woven” symmetry of layout commonly truncated as band designs line work elaboration has elongated triangles pendant dots, triangles with flags, hatchure vertical hatchure separates panels of bands areas of checker boards and crosshature incorporated into whole design
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Pinedale B/W Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Cibola White Ware, Pinedale Black-on-white. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. The Pinedale design style was used in multiple ceramic wares across the American Southwest through time. The Pinedale stylistic tradition was defined by the following characteristics (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): multiple line widths large opposed solid & hatched interlocking elements (whole design field) solid elements equal in size to hatched elements edges of linear motifs show complicated steps & barbs. internal elaboration of triangular, curvilinear, and rectangular motifs with dots, dotted lines, parallel lines, and squiggled lines double banding lines small pendant birds or parrots emerge from elaborate triangles on some Cedar Creek Poly, framing lines are twice as wide as hatchure
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Pinedale B/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, Pinedale Black-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. The Pinedale design style was used in multiple ceramic wares across the American Southwest through time. The Pinedale stylistic tradition was defined by the following characteristics (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): multiple line widths large opposed solid & hatched interlocking elements (whole design field) solid elements equal in size to hatched elements edges of linear motifs show complicated steps & barbs. internal elaboration of triangular, curvilinear, and rectangular motifs with dots, dotted lines, parallel lines, and squiggled lines double banding lines small pendant birds or parrots emerge from elaborate triangles on some Cedar Creek Poly, framing lines are twice as wide as hatchure
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Cibola White Ware Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware Cibola White Ware. Rim sherd stylistic elements could not be identified to a type. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Snowflake B/W Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Cibola White Ware, Snowflake Black-on-white. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
White Mountain Red Ware Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware White Mountain Red Ware. Rim sherd stylistic elements could not be identified to a type. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Cedar Creek Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, Cedar Creek Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Salado W/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Salado White-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Pinto B/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Pinto Black-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Pinto Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Pinto Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Gila B/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Gila Black-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Gila Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Gila Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Gila or Tonto Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Salado Wares (Roosevelt Red Wares), Gila or Tonto Polychrome. These sherds displayed stylistic elements that were difficult to distinguish between types Gila and Tonto Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
St. Johns Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, St. Johns Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
VARCHAR  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Pinedale Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, Pinedale Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. The Pinedale design style was used in multiple ceramic wares across the American Southwest through time. The Pinedale stylistic tradition was defined by the following characteristics (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): multiple line widths large opposed solid & hatched interlocking elements (whole design field) solid elements equal in size to hatched elements edges of linear motifs show complicated steps & barbs. internal elaboration of triangular, curvilinear, and rectangular motifs with dots, dotted lines, parallel lines, and squiggled lines double banding lines small pendant birds or parrots emerge from elaborate triangles on some Cedar Creek Poly, framing lines are twice as wide as hatchure
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Showlow Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, Showlow Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Fourmile Poly. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, Fourmile Polychrome. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels. The Fournile design style was used in multiple ceramic wares across the American Southwest through time. The Fourmile stylistic tradition was defined by the following characteristics (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-34 -- 3-36): whole design focuses on center of field (rather than whole field) layouts lack bilateral symmetry framing lines are always broader than hatching lines rare interlocked solid and hatched elements no double banding lines most motifs are black and have white outlines units with complicated edges do not oppose and interlock with a similarly shaped unit Internal elaboration of primary motifs using parallel hatched units, stepped line fillers, negative stepped units, and occasionally patches of white large biomorphic figures (birds) broad band in bowls retained below rim
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Little Colorado White Ware Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware Little Colorado White Ware. Rim sherd stylistic elements could not be identified to a type. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Walnut B/W Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Little Colorado White Ware, Walnut Black-on-white. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Chevelon B/W Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Little Colorado White Ware, Chevelon Black-on-white. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Hopi yellow ware Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the general decorated ceramic ware Hopi Yellow Ware. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
McDonald Corr. Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type Corrugated Ware, McDonald Corrugated and McDonald Painted Corrugated. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
Showlow B/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the ceramic ware and type Miscellaneous Wares, Showlow Black-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
TOTAL The total number of individually identified vessels (across all decorated ceramic wares and types) in a given stratum.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true
St. Johns B/R Frequency of individual vessels that were identified to the decorated ceramic ware and type White Mountain Red Ware, St. Johns Black-on-red. The Stage 2 Ceramic Decorated/Intrusive analysis examined rim sherds assigned to the same (i.e., individually recognized) vessels to determine ceramic ware and type. Thus, this table records rim sherds assigned to single vessels.
BIGINT  Uncoded Value Ceramic : Count none none true

Keywords

Culture
Hohokam • Salado

Material
Ceramic

Site Name
AR-03-12-06-132(USFS) • AZ U:4:22(ASU) • AZ U:4:33(ASM) • Cline Terrace Mound • Roosevelt 5:10(GP)

Site Type
Artifact Scatter • Funerary and Burial Structures or Features • Hamlet / Village • Hearth • Midden • Mound / Earthwork • Pit • Platform Mound • Post Hole / Post Mold • Rock Alignment • Rock Art • Room Block / Compound / Pueblo

Investigation Types
Architectural Documentation • Data Recovery / Excavation • Heritage Management

Geographic Keywords
Theodore Roosevelt Lake • Tonto Basin • Tonto Creek • Tonto National Forest

Temporal Keywords
Gila Phase • Hohokam Classic period • Hohokam Late Classic period

Temporal Coverage

Calendar Date: 1320 to 1450

Spatial Coverage

min long: -111.264; min lat: 33.767 ; max long: -111.242; max lat: 33.792 ;

Individual & Institutional Roles

Contact(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office

Contributor(s): Owen Lindauer; Peter H. McCartney; Ronna J. Bradley; Judi L. Cameron; J. Phil Dering; Suzanne K. Fish; Chris Loendorf; Theodore J. Oliver; Marcia H. Regan; Christy G. Turner II; Sheldon T. Watson; Glen Rice; Arleyn Simon

Lab Director(s): Arleyn W. Simon

Principal Investigator(s): Glen E. Rice; Charles Redman

Sponsor(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office

Repository(s): Center for Archaeology and Society, Arizona State University

Prepared By(s): Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University

Submitted To(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office

Record Identifiers

Roosevelt Monograph Series(s): 7

Anthropological Field Studies(s): 36

Roosevelt Platform Mound Study, Complex(s): Cline Terrace

Bureau of Reclamation Contract No.(s): 9-CS-32-06230

Roosevelt Platform Mound Study, Management Group(s): Cline Terrace Mound

File Information

  Name Size Creation Date Date Uploaded Access
clinemound_screened_decorated.xls 55.50kb Dec 12, 2014 12:36:20 AM Public
  • Translated version clinemound_screened_decorated_translated.xls (88.00kb)
    Data column(s) in this dataset have been associated with coding sheet(s) and translated: