tDAR Logo tDAR digital antiquity

Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: Bow, Spearthrower, or Both?

Author(s): Pierre Cattelain

Editor(s): Heidi Knecht

Year: 1997

» Downloads & Basic Metadata

Summary

J. Whittaker: Defines atlatl and bow. Spearthrower works by lever action. Discusses two geographical groups 1) Arctic – “used exclusively from a seated position in kayaks in a marine environment” and 2) Australian, used standing in terrestrial settings. Both are highly variable, used with variety of projectiles, often diff forms for same purpose or for specialized purposes, no consistent patterns. Throwing distances recorded over 100m, but hunting from 10-45 m, usually less. Bow range is similar. Bow is more accurate, cites European contests using same distance and targets, participants score 65% as well with atlatl as with bow. Lengthy discussion of experiments with Gravette points replicating finds at Abri Pataud. Goat carcass target, 145 throws, 127 bow shots, 41% and 25% misses. More breakage with atlatl, especially flex breaks, but not really distinctive, so can’t conclude whether were dart or arrow points. [Good article, ethno + exper info, refs].


This Resource is Part of the Following Collections


Cite this Record

Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: Bow, Spearthrower, or Both?. Pierre Cattelain, Heidi Knecht. In Projectile Technology. Pp. 213-240. New York: Plenum Press. 1997 ( tDAR id: 423345)


Keywords

Temporal Keywords
Palaeolithic


Individual & Institutional Roles

Contact(s): EXARC Experimental Archaeology Collection Manager


Record Identifiers

ExArc Id(s): 10156

Notes

Rights & Attribution: The information in this record was originally compiled by Dr. Roeland Paardekooper, EXARC Director.


Arizona State University The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation National Science Foundation National Endowment for the Humanities Society for American Archaeology Archaeological Institute of America