Why 17th and Early 18th Century Sites are Under-Represented, A Delaware–New Jersey Perspective
Author(s): William Liebeknecht
Year: 2020
Summary
This is an abstract from the session entitled "“Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution”: Identifying and Understanding Early Historic-Period House Sites" , at the 2020 annual meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology.
We have all missed sites or misidentified sites…so why does this happen? Early historic sites are everywhere in the Middle Atlantic, but they are not infinite. If you are conducting archaeological surveys in this region and not finding these early sites routinely, you may want to re-examine what you are doing. This presentation is intended to call attention to the way we test and how we interpret evidence from early historic sites. Sites from the late 18th and 19th century are hard to miss. Earlier sites exhibit scant archaeological signatures that require different approaches and a different mindset when located. We need to examine what works and what doesn’t to teach the next generation of archaeologists who will hopefully learn from our mistakes, misconceptions and yes, our arrogance.
Cite this Record
Why 17th and Early 18th Century Sites are Under-Represented, A Delaware–New Jersey Perspective. William Liebeknecht. 2020 ( tDAR id: 456776)
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
Keywords
General
eighteenth
•
missed
•
seventeenth
Geographic Keywords
United States of America
Temporal Keywords
17th and 18th centuries
Spatial Coverage
min long: -129.199; min lat: 24.495 ; max long: -66.973; max lat: 49.359 ;
Individual & Institutional Roles
Contact(s): Society for Historical Archaeology
Record Identifiers
PaperId(s): 671