Historic (Culture Keyword)
10,151-10,175 (12,119 Records)
This letter is in response to the Texas Historical Commission's request for additional information, including a map and proposed construction drawings, for the proposed installation of pre-cast concrete fencing. It was also determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on the eligible buildings and the proposed historic district.
Response from Caroline Wright to David Brigham, Project Review of the Proposed Work at Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas (2008)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from Caroline Wright to James Graham, Proposed Deconstruction of Building 293, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2010)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking to deconstruct Building 293 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The review staff concurs that the deconstruction will have an Adverse Effect on the historic district.
Response from Caroline Wright to Leon Spradling, Project Review for New Static Airplane Display, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer on the proposed undertaking of a new static airplane display at Randolph Air Force Base. After review, SHPO has determined "no adverse effect" on historic properties within the Area of Potential Effect.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter addressing the review of documentation regarding the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation agrees with the steps the Air Force has taken to coordinate undertakings affecting historic properties, but emphasizes the importance of notifying the Council first before the commencement of a project. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the outlined measures taken by the Air Force to meet the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act and the status of the rehabilitation project at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the measures taken and reported by the Air Force to meet the requirements of Section 110 and 106. The Council agrees with the steps that have been taken to coordinate all undertakings and encourages the importance of coordination between the Air Force and the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
This letter is a response to the letter from Randolph Air Force Base that outlined the measures taken by the Air Force to meet the requirements of Section 106 and information of the status of the rehabilitation project at Building 902.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council has received Randolph Air Force Base's letter that outlines the measures taken to meet the requirements of Section 110 and 106 for the rehabilitation project at Building 902. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Harry Finke, Replacement of Windows Buildings 661 and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Concluding correspondence regarding the replacement of the original windows in Buildings 661 and the "B"Wing of Building 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This correspondence is part of a group of letters on a proposed electrical repair of the existing elevator in Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include location maps, historic data, description and assessment, and photographs.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Interior Rehabilitation of Hangar 12, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council has reviewed Randolph Air Force Base's documentation on no adverse effect determination for the proposed interior rehabilitation of Hangar 12. The Council concurs with the determination of no adverse effect. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 208, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation Randolph Air Force Base has provided regarding the determination of no adverse effect for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208. The property is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places however, the Council does not object to the finding of no adverse effect. This document is part of a collection of correspondence concerning the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208, a historic Post...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation sent by Randolph Air Force Base regarding the no adverse effect determination for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 663. The Council does not object to the finding of no adverse effect and provides the conditions set by the Texas State Historic Officer's conditions in order for the project to move forward. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of North Wing Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation regarding the Department of the Air Force's determination of no adverse effect for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter of review regarding a project in progress at Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation requests that Randolph Air Force Base forward more information describing the undertaking and the current status of construction. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has received and reviewed documentation sent by Randolph Air Force Base concerning the proposed project to rehabilitate the A Wing of Building 675. The Advisory Council agrees with the determination of no adverse effect on the historic property. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Hangar 13, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Randolph Air Force Base's documentation on the determination of no adverse effect for the proposed interior rehabilitation of Hangar 13. The Council agrees with the determination but writes this letter with detailed recommendations and concerns. This letter is part of correspondence and summary documentation on a proposed rehabilitation of Hangar 13, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes the renovation of the interior,...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Window Replacement Project Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the information on the proposed replacement of eighty original exterior windows in Building 661at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter addresses the Advisory Council's questions concerning the building's inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and requests Randolph to provide the associated documentation. This letter is part of a group of notes and letters on the proposed rehabilitation and replacement of the eighty...
Response from Claudia Nissley to Richard Booher, Proposed Cleaning and Stabilization of Building 614, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1991)
The Council has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston’s letter and documentation supporting their determination that the stabilization of Building 614, a structure gutted by a previous fire, would have no adverse effect to the building or to the historic district. While the Council commends the Army for retaining the perimeter walls of a building that contributes to the district's historic character, they find the documentation insufficient to permit comment at this time.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
After touring Building 526 and reviewing the summary information on the proposed undertakings at Randolph Air Force Base, the Texas Historical Commission proposes that rather than demolishing the historic structure, it should be used as a storage facility as long as it is usable. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 581, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
The Texas Historical Commission writes this letter after reviewing the propped project for Building 581 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission has determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect and have given approval to the plans as drawn.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
A set of annotated copies of a letter by the Texas Historical Commission concerning a proposed project at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The notes written on these copies are part of an internal correspondence at Randolph Air Force Base, discussing the process of Section 106 coordination.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 131 50 Percent Level Plans, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans at the 50% level for the rehabilitation of Building 131 at Fort Sam Houston. It appears from the plans that a determination of "no adverse effect" will be determined, after a tour of the site by the Commission.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 2792 Wallpaper and Paint, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's proposal to wallpaper and paint the hallways in Building 2792. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no effect" on the historic structure.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Buildings 122, 124, and 125, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's alterations to Buildings 122, 124, and 125. All of the Commission's recommendations have been followed. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 Guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.