San Antonio (Geographic Keyword)
1,376-1,400 (2,041 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received further correspondence from Fort Sam Houston regarding the undertaking for Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and the proposed changes to Building 128 will cause no adverse effect on the historic building or the historic district. Copied to this letter is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided. This letter details the Commission's concerns and recommendations for the proposed undertakings. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project of Building 2000-2001's rehabilitation. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and requests more information before a final review can be completed of the project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project to rehabilitate Building 2264. The Commission's review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and have written this letter outlining its concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Theatre 1 Building 2270, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review for the rehabilitation of Theatre #1, Building 2270, at Fort Sam Houston. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and has determined that sufficient information has not been provided to complete the review of the project. This letter serves as comment and gives a list of requests for correct documentation. Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Revise for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston further correspondence and revisions for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001. This letter seres as additional comment and lists concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the rehabilitation of Building 128. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking including proposed changes from the State Historic Preservation Officer.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas A. Biggerstaff, Project Review for the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking of the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Environmental Assessment Document for New Housing Construction in Patch-Chaffee Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the environmental assessment from Fort Sam Houston for proposed new housing construction in the Patch-Chaffee Area at Fort Sam Houston. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, MOA on Demolition of Building 1030, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's request for a signature of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow the demolition of Building 1030. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission is specifically writing to halt the demolition of Building 1030 since the MOA originally allowing the undertaking was signed in error.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Building 1030 HABS Documentation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the undertaking for Building 1030. The Commission has reviewed the documentation provided an agrees that it fulfills Fort Sam Houston's obligation to provide HABS documentation per the Memorandum of Agreement concerning the proposed demolition of the historic property.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for NEPA Final Draft Including Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, as well as their associated Memorandum of Agreement. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anna McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Pending Environmental Assessment of Proposed Access Control Measures, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Switching Facility in Expanded NHL District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed new switching facility near the old Brooke Army Medical Center. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the expanded Historic Landmark District.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Building 5101, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking to demolish the building - specifically a request to incorporate the historic building into a new proposed dining facility, rather than demolish Building 5101. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Buildings 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101 and Building 5002. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Texas.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's latest information package for the Rehabilitation of Building 2264. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission states that the proposal, as presented, is not at a stage of development to make a formal determination of effect on the building and requests complete plans when they are...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Report for the Stabilization of the Gift Chapel Building 2200, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the report for the stabilization of the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 238 and 240. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and requests photographic documentation for both buildings in order for the review to proceed. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have outlined their recommendations. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical...