Schoolhouse Point Mound Data: Lithic Artifacts from All Contexts
Part of the Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Pinto Creek Complex, Schoolhouse Point Mound (DRAFT) project
Creator(s): Archaeological Research Institute, Arizona State University
Year: 1996
Summary
The Schoolhouse Point Mound Data tables provide a summary of the artifacts recovered during Arizona State University (ASU), Office of Cultural Resource Management's (OCRM) Roosevelt Platform Mound Study (RPMS) excavations at Schoolhouse Point Mound (AZ U:8:24(ASM), AR-03-12-06-13a(USFS)). The Schoolhouse Point Mound table Lithics from All Contexts presents a summary of the lithic artifacts recovered from all contexts (both screened and unscreened) at the site.
The table lists designated archaeological contexts - strata - at the site, and then provides the frequency (count) of different lithic artifact types for each stratum. The strata represent major natural or cultural depositional events such as erosional fill, roof fall, floor contexts, and sterile substrate. Strata are depicted as horizontal rows of interconnected boxes on a Harris Matrix. Within a feature, each stratum is designated by the feature number (e.g., 10, 11, 12, etc.) and a letter that designates a particular stratum (e.g., A, B, C). The letters are assigned in descending order. Mixed levels and artifacts collected out of context are designated by a "?". Artifacts from each feature (or mixed context) are tallied according to strata. Please see column metadata for further detail. Please also see the data table "Schoolhouse Point Mound Data: Strata" for further data about each stratum, including the assigned stratum type, at the following tDAR url: https://core.tdar.org/dataset/394231
The Schoolhouse Point Mound Data tables were originally published on the Roosevelt Platform Mound Monograph Series No. 6 titled "The Place of the Storehouses, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Schoolhouse Point Mound, Pinto Creek Complex, Part 2." The tables were published in an appendix at the end of the volume. Please see the report volume at the following tDAR URL:
Cite this Record
Schoolhouse Point Mound Data: Lithic Artifacts from All Contexts. Archaeological Research Institute, Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona: Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University. 1996 ( tDAR id: 394237) ; doi:10.6067/XCV8GB2624
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
Data Set Structure
Table Information: SHMound_All_Lithics1
Column Name | Data Type | Type | Category | Coding Sheet | Ontology | Search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faceted Stone | Frequency of lithic artifact type Faceted Stone. | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Primary Flake | Frequency of lithic artifac type Primary Flakes in a given stratum. A primary flake is a piece of lithic debitage with a "dorsal surface completely covered with cortex" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Scraper | Frequency of lithic artifact type Scraper in a given stratum. Scrapers received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Spokeshave | Frequency of lithic artifact type Spokeshave in a given stratum. Spokeshaves received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Unperforated Stone Disk | Frequency of lithic artifact type Unperforated Stone Disk in a given stratum. Stone disks were analyzed as part of the Stage 3 Ceramic Analysis Projects: Disks (Ceramic and Lithic) (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-40 -- 3-43 for details). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Perforated Stone Disk | Frequency of lithic artifact type Perforated Stone Disk in a given stratum. Stone disks were analyzed as part of the Stage 3 Ceramic Analysis Projects: Disks (Ceramic and Lithic) (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 3-40 -- 3-43 for details). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Carving | Frequency of lithic artifact type Carving in a given stratum. | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Flat Stone Bead | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament type Flat Stone Bead in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament types - Flat Stone Bead in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Tubular Stone Bead | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament type Tubular Stone Bead in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament types - Tubular Stone Bead in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Stone Tessara | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament type Stone Tessera (mosaic piece) in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament types - Stone Tessera in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Stone Pendant | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament type Stone Pendant in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament types - Stone Pendant in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Apache Tear | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament/raw material type Apace Tear in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament and/or raw material types - Apache Tears in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Fossil | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament/raw material type Fossil in a given stratum. A fossil is any mineralized fossil (often crynoids) (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 5-7). Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament and/or raw material types - Fossils in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Mineral : Count | none | none | true | |
Crystal | Frequency of lithic fine goods ornament/raw material type Crystal in a given stratum. Lithic artifacts that were designated as Fine Goods were examined in a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for fine goods. These artifacts were identified to particular ornament and/or raw material types - Crystals in this case - during that analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-20 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Mineral : Count | none | none | true | |
TOTAL | The total number of lithic artifacts (across all lithic artifact types) in a given stratum. | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Raw Material | Frequency of lithic artifact type (mineral) Raw Material in a given stratum. Raw materials are "pieces of material in unmodified condition – unworked includes apache tears, unworked crystals, unworked nodules or pebbles" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Mineral : Count | none | none | true | |
Polishing Stone | Frequency of lithic artifact type Polishing Stone in a given stratum. A polishing stones is a "small, fine–grained pebble, worn lustrous by polishing pottery" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Pigment Stone | Frequency of lithic artifact type Pigment Stone in a given stratum. Pigment stones are lithic "materials used to make paints or colors; exhibit ground edges and striations" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Uniface | Frequency of lithic artifact type Uniface in a given stratum. A uniface is a lithic artifact "retouched, thinned along one edge or surface (not use–wear only)" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). Unifaces received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Drill | Frequency of lithic artifact type Drill in a given stratum. Drills received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Biface | Frequency of lithic artifact type Biface in a given stratum. Bifaces are lithic artifacts that have been "retouched, thinned on both surfaces" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). Bifaces received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Projectile Point | Frequency of lithic artifact type Projectile Point in a given stratum. Projectile points are "retouched, small, thinned triangular bifaces with hafting elements" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). Projectile points received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis for projectile points, bifaces, and unifaces (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-15 -- 4-18 and associated form for details of the analysis). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Agave Knife | Frequency of lithic artifact type Agave Knife (Tabular/Spall Tool) in a given stratum. Tabular/spall tools are "relatively large, flat tools with unifacial and/or bifacial retouch. Tabular tools are made from platey material and are thin and flat. Spalls have the dorsal side partially or completely covered with cortex and are made from granular material" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-11). Agave knives (tabular/spal tools) received a Stage 3 Special Lithic Analysis (see A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-19 and associated form for details). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Core | Frequency of lithic artifact type Core in a given stratum. Cores are "artifacts with (multiple) negative flake scars; may have platforms; may exhibit crushing and/or step fractures at percussion point(s)" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Hammerstone | Frequency of lithic artifact type Hammerstone in a given stratum. A Hammerstone is a "stone with crushing, hinge and step fractures derived from battering, hammering, or pecking activities" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Shatter | Frequency of lithic artifact type Shatter in a given stratum. Shatter is defined as "angular pieces; no bulb of percussion; no striking platform" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Tertiary Flake | Frequency of lithic artifact type Tertiary Flake in a given stratum. A tertiary flake is a piece of lithic debitage with "no cortex on dorsal or ventral surfaces" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Secondary Flake | Frequency of lithic artifact type Secondary Flake in a given stratum. A secondary flake is a piece of lithic debitage on which the "dorsal surface is partially covered with cortex" (A Laboratory Plan for Salado Research, pp. 4-7 and 4-11). | |||||
BIGINT | Uncoded Value | Chipped Stone : Count | none | none | true | |
Stratum | Identifies a major natural or cultural depositional event such as erosional fill, roof fall, floor contexts, and sterile substrate (i.e., a single archaeological context in both horizontal and vertical space). Strata are depicted as horizontal rows of interconnected boxes on a Harris Matrix. A stratum is a combination of an individual feature and a context in or associated with that feature. For example, Feature 10 might be a structure with an erosonial fill stratum, a roof fall stratum, a floor stratum, and a sterile substrate stratum. Within each feature, each stratum is designated by the feature number (e.g., 10, 11, 12, etc.) and a letter that designates a particular stratum (e.g., A, B, C). The levels excavated in a feature were aggregated into individual feature strata (e.g., Levels 1 - 3 = Stratum A). A feature's stratum letters are assigned in descending order. A context letter of "?" designates a mixed level or context or artifacts collected out of context. Examples: 0? = General Cultural Fill/No Feature and Indeterminate context 10A = Feature 10 and Context A 10B = Feature 10 and Context B 10C = Feature 10 and Context C 22? = Feature 22 and Mixed and/or Undefined context 22A - Feature 22 and Context A Each stratum (e.g., 10C) is assigned to a stratum type. The stratum data are presented in a separate stratum data table. Please see the data table Schoolhouse Point Mound Data: Strata at the following tDAR url: https://core.tdar.org/dataset/394231 Examples: 10A = Feature 10 and Context A = Feature 10, erosional fill 10B = Feature 10 and Context B = Feature 10, roof fall 10C = Feature 10 and Context C = Feature 10, floor Artifacts collected from each feature are tallied according to strata. For example, artifacts collected from Feature 10 are tallied for Stratum A, Stratum B, Stratum C, etc. | |||||
VARCHAR | Uncoded Value | Provenience and Context : Stratum | none | none | true |
Keywords
Material
Chipped Stone
Site Name
AR-03-12-06-13a(USFS)
•
AZ U:8:101(ASU)
•
AZ U:8:24(ASM)
•
Schoolhouse Point Mound
Site Type
Artifact Scatter
•
Funerary and Burial Structures or Features
•
Hamlet / Village
•
Hearth
•
Midden
•
Mound / Earthwork
•
Platform Mound
•
Post Hole / Post Mold
•
Refuse Pit
•
Roasting Pit / Oven / Horno
•
Rock Alignment
•
Rock Art
•
Room Block / Compound / Pueblo
•
Storage Pit
Investigation Types
Architectural Documentation
•
Data Recovery / Excavation
•
Heritage Management
•
Methodology, Theory, or Synthesis
Geographic Keywords
Pinto Creek
•
Salt River
•
Theodore Roosevelt Lake
•
Tonto Basin
•
Tonto National Forest
Temporal Keywords
Classic Period
Temporal Coverage
Calendar Date: 690 to 1630
Spatial Coverage
min long: -111.021; min lat: 33.633 ; max long: -110.986; max lat: 33.674 ;
Individual & Institutional Roles
Contact(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office
Contributor(s): Peter H. McCartney; Arleyn W. Simon; Ronna J. Bradley; Judi L. Cameron; J. Phil Dering; Suzanne K. Fish; Joel D. Irish; Chris Loendorf; Marcia H. Regan; Christy G. Turner II; Lisa Ipock
Principal Investigator(s): Glen E. Rice; Charles Redman
Sponsor(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office
Repository(s): Center for Archaeology and Society, Arizona State University
Prepared By(s): Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University
Submitted To(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office
Record Identifiers
Roosevelt Monograph Series(s): 6
Anthropological Field Studies(s): 35
Roosevelt Platform Mound Study, Complex(s): Pinto Creek
Bureau of Reclamation Contract No.(s): 9-CS-32-06230
Roosevelt Platform Mound Study, Management Group(s): Schoolhouse
File Information
Name | Size | Creation Date | Date Uploaded | Access | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
shmound_all_lithics.xls | 100.00kb | Dec 9, 2014 6:33:27 PM | Public | ||
Translated version
shmound_all_lithics_translated.xls
(224.50kb)
Data column(s) in this dataset have been associated with coding sheet(s) and translated:
|