Historic (Culture Keyword)
10,351-10,375 (12,401 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Fickel, Project Review for Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the proposed undertaking of Karsts Research at Camp Bullis. The Commission suggests that a Programmatic Agreement be developed to govern standard operating procedures when human remains or artifacts are disturbed during karst excavations at Camp Bullis.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review of Demolition of Buildings 4226 and 2013-2017 Beebe Loop, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the project review for the demolition of Buildings 4226, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 at Beebe Loop. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Loyce Ince, San Antonio Conservation Society.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Demolition and Selective Demolition Proposals, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical has received and reviewed a recent letter from Fort Sam Houston regarding demolition and selective demolition of historic properties. These actions are proposed to take advantage of facility reduction dollars available for this fiscal year. This letter outlines the Commission's detailed comments for each property under consideration for the proposed undertaking.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Rehabilitation of Building 1026, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review document from Fort Sam Houston regarding the rehabilitation of Building 1026. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" on the historic resource.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Tour Thank You, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1998)
The Texas Historical Commission wrote this thank you to Fort Sam Houston for their hosted tour of the installation's historic resources and leading-edge medical facilities.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Buildings 200 and 671 Alterations Without Prior Consultation, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2002)
This letter addresses the recently completed alterations at Randolph Air Force Base including Buildings 200 and 671. This document is part of a collection of memos, notes and original memorandums related to recent undertakings in Buildings 200 and 671, structures at Randolph Air Force Base that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Leonard Patrick, Proposed Elevator Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission completed its review of the document package of the proposed project of an elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission does not agree with Randolph's determination of No Adverse Effect and has written this letter at length to discuss the Commission's reasoning. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the southwest corner of the secondary elevation of Building 900,...
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.
Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from James Bruseth to Cornelius Allen, Programmatic Agreement, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (1988)
Correspondence between the Texas Historical Commission and Directorate of Engineering and Housing at Fort Sam Houston concerning a programmatic agreement received by the Commission. Listed are general and specific comments by the Texas Historical Commission. Carbon copied to this letter is Paul McGuff, Bob Fink, and Stan Graves.
Response from James Bruseth to Lisa Orlando, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
This letter, written by the Texas Historical Commission, gives a brief overview of the Fort Sam Houston Property. The correspondence was written for Lisa A. Orlando, Environmental Scientist, BSA Environmental Services, Inc..
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Ensch, Draft Report: A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season, Camp Bullis, Texas (1998)
The Texas Historical Commission has received the draft archeological survey report from Fort Worth titled "A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season." The Commission wrote this letter to state their agreement with the conclusions of the authors of the report, which have been endorsed by the COE-FWD, and reviewed and approved by the Commission's National Register Division. Copied to this correspondence is Ross C. Fields and Karl W. Kibler, Co-Principal...
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Mocek, Draft Report of Archaeological Survey, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
The Texas Historical Commission has reviewed the draft report entitled "Camp Bullis Archeological and Historical Investigations, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas: The 1989 Season."They find the report to be thorough and it is agreed that the assessment of the resources, specifically of the prehistoric and historic sights, is correct concerning their inclusion or non-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from James Graham to Emily Payne, Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission requested an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) relative to Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston. Because the old laundry facility site has been polluted with cleaning solvents over the course of time, the remaining portions of the building must be demolished in order to facilitate remediation of the property, and thus the need for an amendment. This letter contains the requested MOA amendment.
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Roof Replacement at Building 4192, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
Fort Sam Houston provided the Texas Historical Commission with proposed design options for a roof replacement at Building 4192. This letter by the Commission stresses the importance of the roof replacement and that it may have a "profound" effect on the appearance of the historical building. The letter goes on to detail a review by the National Register Department.
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to William Fickel, Building 371 Comments, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
The Department of Architecture and the National Register Department of the Texas Historical Commission have written a letter of comments for the project involving Building 371. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger (Fort Sam Houston Preservation Architect) and Joseph Murphy (Fort Worth Corps of Engineers).
Response from James Steely to Joseph Logan, Building 156, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
The National Register Department has conducted a review of Building 156 and has designated it as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive documentation concerning Building 156, a World War II temporary building at Randolph Air Force Base. Most of the documents focus on the building's status in the National Register of Historic Places, as well as a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 156.
Response from Jessica Villarreal to Dee Brame, Alter Repair and Remove Asbestos Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base writes to recommend that the suspension of work be partially lifted and list in this letter the changes to be made by contractors within 7 working days. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter addressing the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building's interior and exterior features were rehabilitated prior to the completion of the Section 106 process. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and includes location maps,...
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter with attachments that outline and give full detail on the proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments to these letters include location maps, historic data, undertaking description, and photographs. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter from Randolph Air Force Base to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that details newly established steps to assist in meeting the requirements of Sections 110 and 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangar 12 Interior, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base is writing the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation to offer summary documentation on a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate the interior of Hangar 12. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.