Randolph Air Force Base (Geographic Keyword)

601-625 (757 Records)

Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Window Replacement Project Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Claudia Nissley.

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the information on the proposed replacement of eighty original exterior windows in Building 661at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter addresses the Advisory Council's questions concerning the building's inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and requests Randolph to provide the associated documentation. This letter is part of a group of notes and letters on the proposed rehabilitation and replacement of the eighty...


Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Demetrio Jimenez.

After touring Building 526 and reviewing the summary information on the proposed undertakings at Randolph Air Force Base, the Texas Historical Commission proposes that rather than demolishing the historic structure, it should be used as a storage facility as long as it is usable. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.


Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 581, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Demetrio Jimenez.

The Texas Historical Commission writes this letter after reviewing the propped project for Building 581 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission has determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect and have given approval to the plans as drawn.


Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Demetrio Jimenez.

A set of annotated copies of a letter by the Texas Historical Commission concerning a proposed project at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The notes written on these copies are part of an internal correspondence at Randolph Air Force Base, discussing the process of Section 106 coordination.


Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Confirmation of Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Thomas S. O'Beirne.

A letter confirming a phone conversation in relation to the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning...


Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Thomas S. O'Beirne.

A letter reviewing the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning duct work.


Response from Don Klima to Leonard Patrick, Building 900 Construction of Exterior Elevator, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Don L. Klima.

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force's no adverse effect determination for the proposed construction of an exterior elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, TX. The Council does not agree with the Air Force's determination and has declared an adverse effect on the historic property. This letter explains in detail the Council's decision. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the...


Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Building 902 Alterations, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Curtis Tunnell.

A letter requesting a meeting between Randolph Air Force Base and the Texas Historical Commission staff to coordinate and discuss the proposed rehabilitation of Building 902. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.


Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Renovation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Donald L. Peterson.

This letter states the cooperation of Randolph Air Force Base with the Texas Historical Commission in coordinating undertakings, including projects involving doors and windows.


Response from Emmitt Smith to Curtis Tunnell, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Emmitt G. Smith.

Correspondence including three engineering studies conducted on Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Project Review for Cold War-Era Building and Structure Inventory and Assessment, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The review staff from the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bob Brinkman, has reviewed the submitted information and concur with the determinations of eligibility including that of Building 40 and Building 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Bruce R. Nadler, Project Review of New Canopy and Alterations to Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bradford Patterson, has completed its review of the proposed alterations to Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed alterations will have no adverse effect on Hangar 63 or its National Historic Landmark District.


Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Colonel Patrick, Project Review of Flagstone Sidewalks, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission has received a submittal from Randolph Air Force Base to replace the historic flagstone sidewalks with concrete. After review, and because of the sidewalks' installation in the 1930s, the Commission sees the existing flagstone sidewalks as a contributor to the character of the district and their replacement with concrete does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The standards...


Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Buildings 200 and 671 Alterations Without Prior Consultation, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

This letter addresses the recently completed alterations at Randolph Air Force Base including Buildings 200 and 671. This document is part of a collection of memos, notes and original memorandums related to recent undertakings in Buildings 200 and 671, structures at Randolph Air Force Base that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.


Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Leonard Patrick, Proposed Elevator Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission completed its review of the document package of the proposed project of an elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission does not agree with Randolph's determination of No Adverse Effect and has written this letter at length to discuss the Commission's reasoning. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the southwest corner of the secondary elevation of Building 900,...


Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.


Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary D. Vest.

A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.


Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Harry F. Finke.

Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.


Response from James Steely to Joseph Logan, Building 156, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text James W. Steely.

The National Register Department has conducted a review of Building 156 and has designated it as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive documentation concerning Building 156, a World War II temporary building at Randolph Air Force Base. Most of the documents focus on the building's status in the National Register of Historic Places, as well as a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 156.


Response from Jessica Villarreal to Dee Brame, Alter Repair and Remove Asbestos Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Jessica Villarreal.

Randolph Air Force Base writes to recommend that the suspension of work be partially lifted and list in this letter the changes to be made by contractors within 7 working days. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.


Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text John C. Harper.

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.


Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Joseph M. Logan.

A letter addressing the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building's interior and exterior features were rehabilitated prior to the completion of the Section 106 process. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and includes location maps,...


Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Joseph M. Logan.

A letter with attachments that outline and give full detail on the proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments to these letters include location maps, historic data, undertaking description, and photographs. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.


Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Joseph M. Logan.

A letter from Randolph Air Force Base to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that details newly established steps to assist in meeting the requirements of Sections 110 and 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.


Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangar 12 Interior, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Joseph M. Logan.

Randolph Air Force Base is writing the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation to offer summary documentation on a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate the interior of Hangar 12. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.