Research Design / Data Recovery Plan (Investigation Type)

DATASET Katherine Shillinglaw.

Database for 21PL72 and 21PL74.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steve Swanson.

Unit 101 is located in Area A of the 3-Up Site, at the western edge of a large mound cut deeply by a bulldozer. This unit was selected for excavation to provide a profile of mound stratigraphy without extensive excavation of unlooted areas, and to enhance information recovered from a test-profile in the same room during fall of 2005 conducted by Roger Anyon. Anyon’s profile was excavated along the exposed north wall of the room, but was unable to confidently locate floor features due to the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steve Swanson.

Unit 102 is located in Area A of the 3-Up Site, near the northeastern corner of a large mound along a 1 to 2 m deep bulldozed trench. This unit was selected for excavation to provide additional information on the depositional history for this part of the site. The bulldozer trench that cuts through this part of the mound revealed possible wall alignments along its length, and we placed the unit in a location where the trench appeared to have clipped only part of a prehistoric room located some...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Karen Schollmeyer.

Unit 201 is located in Area B, at the northern edge of a large bulldozer cut through the central portion of Area B. This excavation unit was intended primarily to allow excavators to expose a profile and examine stratigraphy in this area without doing extensive excavation or disturbing the remaining unlooted portions of the site. The unit’s location at the edge of a deep, steep-sided bulldozer cut was ideal for this purpose. No walls were visible in the portion of Area B near the bulldozer cut,...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Colleen Strawhacker.

Unit 301 is located on the western side of Mound C in the 3-Up site. The unit was excavated through the overburden of a bulldozer cut and into intact deposits. While the small size of the unit and the lack of walls exposed limited our ability to fully understand the contexts of the cultural surfaces located in Unit 301, the excavation produced a number of artifacts and dateable samples that will provide information about the occupational history of Mound C.

DATASET Jennifer Haas.

Artifact database from 32MO0296-0306-1374-1375. The database contain the lot books from 32MO296, 32MO306, 32MO1374, and 32MO1375, as well as the inventory and photo log for all four sites. All flakes from all four sites are pulled together in a table, as well as all flakes from all four sites greater than 2 mm. An additional table of all artifacts from all four sites that are greater than 2 mm is also included. All artifacts and photos are currently housed at GLARC.

DOCUMENT Citation Only James A. Head. Susan T. Goodfellow. Paul H. Rosendahl. PHRI.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DATASET Rhiannon Jones.

Access Database from Kieler I (47GT0593). Database contains Lot Book, Lab Inventory, and an inventory of all photos and slides curated at University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Separate tables have been made for diagnostic artifacts including: Bifaces, Points, Scrapers, Other, and Decorated Rim Sherds. This collection is curated at University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.

IMAGE Katherine Shillinglaw.

A selection of point images from Kieler I (47GT0593).

DATASET Rhiannon Jones.

Access database from Kieler II (47GT0594). Database contains a photo inventory, an artifact inventory, and the lot book. All artifacts and photos are curated at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.

IMAGE Katherine Shillinglaw.

A collection of images of points from Kieler II (47GT0594).

DATASET Rhiannon Jones.

Database for Roling site (47GT0628). The database for 47GT0628 contains a lot book, artifact inventory, and a size grade inventory. In attempts to have more data for the interpretation in the Phase III the Phase I and II data was also imported into the database in a separate inventory of the site. All photos and artifacts are curated at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.

IMAGE Katherine Shillinglaw.

A selection of images from Roling I site (47GT0628).

DATASET Rhiannon Jones.

Database from Bend in the Creek site (47GT0693). Database includes the Lot Book and an Artifact Inventory. Artifacts and photos are curated at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.

IMAGE Katherine Shillinglaw.

A selection of point types collected at the Bend in the Creek site (47GT0693)

PROJECT Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Project metadata for resources within the 611th Air Support Group cultural heritage resources collection.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Phyllys Callina.

The U.S. Air Force proposed to construct an equipment storage building on a 1-acre parcel located northwest of the intersection of Pole Line and Artillery Roads at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. Because the proposed project included federal funds and lands, it qualified as an undertaking under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), U.S. Code (USC) Title 54, Section 306108 (54 USC 306108); therefore, an identification-phase cultural resources survey of the project...

DOCUMENT Citation Only Paul Harmer Rosendahl.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Full-Text J Bateman.

This document describes the account of a visit to the Huacas in November of 1860.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Michael Heilen.

This summarizes a report that discusses the validity of the assumptions made when, for the sake of conserving funding and curation space, in-field artifact analysis is used over lab analysis of artifacts in western states.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Glennda Gene Luhnow. Nancy Shelton.

The Grand Canalscape Phase II (TIGER) Shared-use Path project is a City of Phoenix (City) pathway improvement project that would complete a shareduse path along the Grand Canal from Interstate 17 (1-17) in Phoenix to the City of Tempe border at 56th Street. The pathway improvements would occur along three discontiguous segments of the Grand Canal (designated as segments 1, 2, and 3). Phase I of the Grand Canalscape, which is under construction, would provide the connection between the three...

DOCUMENT Citation Only Carolyn E. Kyle.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Citation Only Joseph A. Jimenez.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Michael Stubing. Douglas R. Mitchell.

Archaeological testing was conducted by SWCA, Inc. in September, 1998 within the Adamsville Ruin near Florence, Arizona. The site is a large Hohokam village containing a platform mound, ball court, numerous trash mounds, and a dense artifact scatter. The testing was done to assess the impact of replacing wood poles that are part of the Oracle-Coolidge 115 KV transmission line. The testing was done at the request of the Western Area Power Administration prior to replacement of three pairs of wood...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Eric Blinman.

This document is an extension of work begun by William A. Lucius, and its substance owes much to his foresight in the design of the Dolores Archaeological Program ceramic analysis system. Scott Travis authored a draft research design for ceramics which was helpful during the writing of portions of the present version. Dean Wilson and Rob Waterworth provided intense discussions of the interpretation of ceramic data, and their arguments and ideas have shaped and continue to shape...