AZ U:1:31 (ASU) (Site Name Keyword)

1-4 (4 Records)

An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the Desert Mountain Properties, North Scottsdale, Arizona (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Douglas R. Mitchell.

This report presents the results of a literature search and archaeological field survey for a 35 acre parcel of land in north Scottsdale, Arizona. SWCA was contacted by Environmental Engineering Consultants, Inc. to conduct an archaeological assessment of this parcel in conjunction with site development. The parcel is within a larger development area privately owned by Desert Mountain Properties, Inc. The archaeological assessment of the property was requested to meet the requirements of the...


Carefree Site Arizona Site Steward File (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text K. J. Schroeder.

This is an Arizona Site Steward file for the Carefree Site, located on privately owned land. The file consists of the site data form only. The earliest dated document is from 1994.


James Schoenwetter Pollen Research Papers
PROJECT Uploaded by: Mary Whelan

James Schoenwetter (Ph.D. Southern Illinois 1967) was a Professor Emeritus at Arizona State University. His research interests included prehistoric cultural ecology, applications of pollen analysis in archaeology and research methodology. Before his retirement in 2000 he directed the ASU Anthropology Department’s palynology lab. Pollen research by Schoenwetter and his students involved a variety of sites in Mesoamerica, North America and Europe. He directed archaeological and botanical...


Pollen Records from AZ:U:1:30 and U:1:31: An Assessment (1976)
DOCUMENT Full-Text James Schoenwetter.

Pilot study to assess the type of archaeological-context pollen samples most likely to yield results commensurate with investment. Results suggest floor sediment and floor feature fill deposits will yield better data for developing a pollen sequence than floor contact deposits. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction, however, will require financial support for a major surface sample control research effort that cannot be justified as site-focussed cultural resources management.