Governmental Structure (Site Type Keyword)

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This Section 106 coordination memo describes the installation of external handrails on Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas. Section 106 coordination with the Texas SHPO is also included.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

The purpose of this memo is to provide information for Section 106 review of an undertaking to rehabilitate the restrooms on the first floor of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. Randolph proposes an undertaking that will convert one of the men's restrooms to a women's restroom and convert the existing women's restroom to a unisex/ADA restroom. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society and Jack Siegel (HQ AETC/CEPN).

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A meeting was held at the Texas Historical Commission to discuss window replacement and other historical matters of concern. Part of the discussion involved Section 106 not being completed on Buildings 902, 216 and 675 "B Wing" prior to the project start.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The purpose of this memo is to provide LTC Kanno with background information on the Handrail project and the proposed project to install quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The purpose of this memo is for Randolph Air Force Base to provide LTC Kanno with a package, per his request, that can be presented to the SPTG/CC on handrail installation for entrances to Building 100.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A meeting was held at the Texas Historical Commission to discuss Randolph Air Force Base's projects. This letter details the negotiations that took place during the meeting. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination concerning the memorandum on a proposed project for Hangar 62 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination on the memorandum providing the State Historic Preservation Office with project information and it requests comments on the proposed design of a canopy at the southwest corner of Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Additionally, a double door will be cut into the hangar wall between the pillars.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO indicates our intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. In the original Section 106 letter to the SHPO in 1992 we indicated that we would use the original tiles if at all possible. In 1993, US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The sentence in the first Section 106 letter to the SHPO we sent to your office and was changed so...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO spells out the intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The determination was No Adverse Effect; therefore, additional coordination with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ritchey Woods.

Record of correspondence made in an effort to ascertain how and where the components for the original steel framed windows removed from Building 902 had been disposed of at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.

DOCUMENT Full-Text John Bullough.

Undated memorandum from Joint Base Andrews requesting the Maryland Historical Trust review and comment on the findings of the submitted report, 'Historic Building Inventory and Evaluation for Joint Base Andrews, Price Georges' County, Maryland', which identified five resources as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rick Chandler.

Memos for record of a meeting concerning issues surrounding the demolition of Canon Air Force Base Building 129 and the completion of the Section 106 process in time.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Bruce R. Nadler.

This memorandum concerns the proposed construction of a canopy and the cutting of a double doorway on the secondary elevation of Hangar 63. Hanger 63 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The Base Civil Engineer determined an undertaking does exist with potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harvey Browder.

This memorandum addresses an amendment that was issued to add historical compliance requirements for the Hangar 6 entrance door at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Leon D. Spradling.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed construction of an internal elevator and upgrade of the external access ramp at Building 100. Repair and Renovation of the antiquated electrical, electronic, security, water and sewer systems will be modernized. All steel casement windows will be repaired. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This memorandum concerns the installation of quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. After careful and in-depth consideration of this undertaking, Randolph determined there would be an effect. However, the effect would not result in the removal of the building from the Register or significantly distract from its character-defining features. As a result, the determination is No Adverse Effect. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the proposed construction of a handicapped ramp on the secondary elevation of Building 671, located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect" for the undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the functional use of Hangar 70. Hangar 70 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Constructed in 1931 to store and repair aircraft, it was converted to a gymnasium circa 1942. In 2007, a new gymnasium (Fitness Center) was completed. This action will allow Hangar 70 is to be renovated and returned to function as an aircraft hangar.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed interior rehabilitation and restoration of Building 100, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined that the undertaking is "No Adverse Effect" and has provided in this letter summery documentation for review. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses an undertaking at Hangar 64, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Included is an undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A review was conducted on Hangar 70 by applying procedures contained in the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR part 800 (Section 106), and the guidelines of Division Instruction 32-1 as they pertain to the effects of rehabilitation treatment measures criteria. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located within the Randolph Field Historic District. It was also determined that the proposed scope of work would have an adverse effect on the historic property or its district - this letter explains this decision.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on the Temporary Lodging Facilities and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project to replace front and rear external doors, it as determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 901 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work and past, related discussions it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.