Historic Governmental Structure (Site Type Keyword)
Parent: Governmental Structure
Specified area containing evidence that is associated with historic governmental activity.
1,401-1,425 (1,676 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the Preconcept Proposal from Fort Sam Houston for the window repair to Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Draft Preservation Assessment of the Beach Pavilion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston responding to the comments previously sent by the Commission. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. If the recommendations in this letter are implemented, the Commission will concur with the determination of "No Adverse Effect" for the proposed undertaking.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Replacement of Aluminum Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Colonel Thresher's letter on the proposed replacement of aluminum windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Structural Repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A-D, 167, and 172A-D Officer’s Quarters and Artillery Post, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the Advance Final Design for the structural repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A, 121B, 121C, 121D, 167, 172A, 172B, 172C, and 172D. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for this work.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Annual Report, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the annual report of activities effecting cultural resources. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is James Bruseth (Archeology Division) and Lee Keatinge (ACHP).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Parking Pads Near Buildings 2279-2284, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission a project review for parking pads near Buildings 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, and 2284. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submittal from Fort Sam Houston for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston for window replacement in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Replace Windows in Building 2376 Correction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a project review for window replacement in Building 2376. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Update on Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the updated information package submitted by Fort Sam Houston for the proposed window replacement in Building 2792. After review, the Commission has determined that the project, as currently proposed, would have an "adverse effect" on the building. The letter lists in detail the reasons for the Commission's determination.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Proposed Review for New Housing Units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received additional information from Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed new housing units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area. The project proposes to build sixty new single family housing units. Based on the information provided, the Commission has determined that this project will have no adverse effect on historic properties at Fort Sam Houston.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Wendy Martinson, Project Review for Draft EA and FONSI for Proposed Consolidated Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Demolition and Selective Demolition Proposals, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical has received and reviewed a recent letter from Fort Sam Houston regarding demolition and selective demolition of historic properties. These actions are proposed to take advantage of facility reduction dollars available for this fiscal year. This letter outlines the Commission's detailed comments for each property under consideration for the proposed undertaking.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Buildings 200 and 671 Alterations Without Prior Consultation, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2002)
This letter addresses the recently completed alterations at Randolph Air Force Base including Buildings 200 and 671. This document is part of a collection of memos, notes and original memorandums related to recent undertakings in Buildings 200 and 671, structures at Randolph Air Force Base that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Leonard Patrick, Proposed Elevator Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission completed its review of the document package of the proposed project of an elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission does not agree with Randolph's determination of No Adverse Effect and has written this letter at length to discuss the Commission's reasoning. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the southwest corner of the secondary elevation of Building 900,...
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.
Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from James Graham to Emily Payne, Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission requested an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) relative to Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston. Because the old laundry facility site has been polluted with cleaning solvents over the course of time, the remaining portions of the building must be demolished in order to facilitate remediation of the property, and thus the need for an amendment. This letter contains the requested MOA amendment.
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Roof Replacement at Building 4192, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
Fort Sam Houston provided the Texas Historical Commission with proposed design options for a roof replacement at Building 4192. This letter by the Commission stresses the importance of the roof replacement and that it may have a "profound" effect on the appearance of the historical building. The letter goes on to detail a review by the National Register Department.
Response from James Steely to Joseph Logan, Building 156, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
The National Register Department has conducted a review of Building 156 and has designated it as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive documentation concerning Building 156, a World War II temporary building at Randolph Air Force Base. Most of the documents focus on the building's status in the National Register of Historic Places, as well as a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 156.
Response from Jessica Villarreal to Dee Brame, Alter Repair and Remove Asbestos Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base writes to recommend that the suspension of work be partially lifted and list in this letter the changes to be made by contractors within 7 working days. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter addressing the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building's interior and exterior features were rehabilitated prior to the completion of the Section 106 process. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and includes location maps,...
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter with attachments that outline and give full detail on the proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments to these letters include location maps, historic data, undertaking description, and photographs. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.