Historic Period (Temporal Keyword)

Historic Periods

376-400 (522 Records)

Phase 1 Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a Multicomponent Rockshelter at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona
PROJECT USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office.

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), ACS conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park, in 2008. The site was being impacted by increased visitation and Reclamation is seeking to mitigate those impacts. ACS archaeologists completed surface collection, mapping, and soil coring at the site. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to...


Phase 1 Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Photo Log for Coring and Testing Images (2009)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), ACS conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park, in 2008. The site was being impacted by increased visitation and Reclamation is seeking to mitigate those impacts. ACS archaeologists completed surface collection, mapping, and soil coring at the site. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to...


Phase 1 Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Photo Log for Surface Collection Images (2009)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), ACS conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park, in 2008. The site was being impacted by increased visitation and Reclamation is seeking to mitigate those impacts. ACS archaeologists completed surface collection, mapping, and soil coring at the site. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to...


Phase 1 Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Select Photos of Coring and Testing (2009)
IMAGE Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), ACS conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park, in 2008. The site was being impacted by increased visitation and Reclamation is seeking to mitigate those impacts. ACS archaeologists completed surface collection, mapping, and soil coring at the site. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to...


Phase 1 Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Select Photos of Surface Collection (2009)
IMAGE Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), ACS conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park, in 2008. The site was being impacted by increased visitation and Reclamation is seeking to mitigate those impacts. ACS archaeologists completed surface collection, mapping, and soil coring at the site. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to...


Phase 1B Archaeological Survey: Proposed Bennington Substation, Town of Bennington, Bennington County, Vermont (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text The Louis Berger Group, Inc..

On behalf of Vermont Transco, LLC (VELCO), of Rutland, Vermont, The Louis Berger Group, Inc. (Berger), of Albany, New York, conducted a Phase IB archaeological survey for the proposed Bennington Substation, located in the Town of Bennington, Bennington County, Vermont. VELCO has determined an upgrade of the Bennington 115kV substation is required to meet the Independent System Operator of New England (ISONE) operating and reliability criteria. Subsurface survey was conducted at 18...


Phase 2 Data Recovery at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a Multicomponent Rockshelter at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona
PROJECT USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office.

In 2008, at the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office (PXAO), Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. (ACS) conducted Phase 1 cultural resource assessments and investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a multicomponent rockshelter site in Lake Pleasant Regional Park. These investigations confirmed that the site held the potential to yield important information about the Prehistoric, Protohistoric, and Historic period occupations of the Lake Pleasant area. Please see...


Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a Multicomponent Hohokam, Yavapai, and Euroamerican Rockshelter Site at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: M Scott Thompson

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office, ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]), Yavapai County, Arizona. Based on the results of Phase 1 investigations conducted at the site (Pinter et al. 2009), Reclamation determined that potentially significant subsurface cultural deposits were present that could provide important new data on prehistoric, protohistoric, and historic Native American and Euroamerican occupation of the...


Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Hohokam, Yavapai, and Euroamerican Rockshelter Site at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: system user

At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation-Phoenix Area Office, ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]), Yavapai County, Arizona. Based on the results of Phase 1 investigations conducted at the site (Pinter et al. 2009), Reclamation determined that potentially significant subsurface cultural deposits were present that could provide important new data on prehistoric, protohistoric, and historic Native American and Euroamerican occupation of the...


Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Photo Log (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]) in 2010 at the request of the Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office. The proposed work plan for Phase 2 (Pinter et al. 2009) was accepted by Reclamation, and was implemented in two sessions due to inclement weather and rising lake levels. The first session occurred in January 2010, followed by a hiatus to allow the lake level to drop and the weather to cool; the second and final session occurred in...


Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Select Photos (2010)
IMAGE Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd..

ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]) in 2010 at the request of the Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office. The proposed work plan for Phase 2 (Pinter et al. 2009) was accepted by Reclamation, and was implemented in two sessions due to inclement weather and rising lake levels. The first session occurred in January 2010, followed by a hiatus to allow the lake level to drop and the weather to cool; the second and final session occurred in...


PHASE I AND II ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF APPROXIMATELY 338 ACRES IN AREAS A, B, AND D AT THE SAGE MILL/PINE TREE TRACT AIKEN COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Kimberly Nagle. William Green. Heather Jones.

"S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), on behalf of Wyatt Realty Investment Opportunity Fund, has completed a Phase I archaeological survey of approximately 338 acres in Areas A, B, and D and Phase II testing at sites 38AK940 and 38AK1015 at the Sage Mill/Pine Tree Tract in Aiken County, South Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). Phase I fieldwork for the project was conducted from October 19 through November 8, 2011. Phase II fieldwork was conducted from December 12–17, 2011. This work was done in anticipation of...


Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the North Augusta Water Treatment Plant Expansion Aiken County, South Carolina (2013)
DOCUMENT Full-Text William Green. Sarah Posin. Jennifer Betsworth.

"S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), on behalf of URS Corporation (URS), has completed a Phase I archaeological survey of approximately 6.8 acres at the proposed North Augusta Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Expansion in Aiken County, South Carolina. The project area is located immediately west of the Savannah River and north of the existing water treatment facility in North Augusta (Figures 1 and 2). This work was done in anticipation of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,...


A Phase I Archaeological Survey of Primary Roads Project Stp-92-3(28)--2C-01, A.K.A. PIN 99-01010-1, Adair County, Iowa (2002)
DOCUMENT Citation Only James M. Collins.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.


Phase I Archeological Survey at Selected Areas in the Batchtown Division of the Mark Twain National Wildlife Refuge, Calhoun County, Illinois (1994)
DOCUMENT Citation Only Douglas Kullen.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.


Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the York Street Bridge Replacement Project, City of Aiken, Aiken County, South Carolina (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Natalie Adams. Valerie Davis. Summer Ciomek. Jackie Tyson.

"New South Associates, under subcontract to Davis & Floyd, conducted a Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the proposed replacement of the York Street (S-2-31) bridges over the Norfolk Southern Railroad cut in response to a request by the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT). The proposed project, located within the Aiken Winter Colony Historic District II, would remove the existing low profile pair of wooden bridges and replace them with a one, two-lane concrete and masonry...


Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of 1.47 miles on SC 125 in North Augusta, Aiken County, South Carolina (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Ramona Grunden.

"An approximately 1.47 mile long by 120 foot wide corridor on SC 125 (E. Buena Vista and Atomic Rd) in North Augusta. Proposed improvements include the addition of a center tum land, improved turning radii, a planted median and sections of new curb and sidewalk. The survey corridor includes commercial and residential areas as well as a government complex and public recreational facilities. Substantial drainage improvements are located along E. Buena Vista where an unnamed drainage parallels the...


Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of SC 126, Aiken County, South Carolina (2013)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Natalie Adams Pope. Kristie L. Person.

"This project consisted of background research, archaeological field survey, architectural field survey, and assessment of all archaeological sites and architectural resources for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The area of potential effect (APE) is defined as the construction limits and the view shed, which is 300 feet beyond the existing right-of-way (ROW). The area of archaeological emphasis in the APE is defined as 100 feet from the existing ROW. For...


Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Southern Natural Gas Company Graniteville Pipeline Expansion Project, Aiken County, South Carolina (1995)
DOCUMENT Full-Text William P. Athens. Jon Berkin. Stephen Hinks. Ralph Draughon, Jr.. E. Burton Kemp III. Luis Williams. William P. Athens.

"Phase I cultural resources survey of the proposed 5.6 km (3.5 mil Southern Natural Gas Company Graniteville Pipeline Expansion Project was conducted by R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc., from February 8 through May 3 1995. This project was undertaken in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The proposed project corridor originates at an existing Southern Natural Gas Company pipeline located southeast of Warrenville, South Carolina,...


Phase I Investigation, Explosive Ordinance Demolition Expansion, Fort A.P. Hill
PROJECT Uploaded by: system user

A Survey of approximately 1028 acres for explosive ordinance demolition training areas at Fort A.P. Hill. This project contains the artifact catalog and photographs from this survey.


Phase II Archaeological Investigation at the Carter Road and New US 60 Bypass Interchange Project (15DA150), Owensboro, Daviess County, Kentucky (1994)
DOCUMENT Citation Only Veronica A. Riegel.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.


Phase II Archaeological Survey of a Defensive Earthwork, Fort Lee (FL1988.002)
PROJECT Ronald A. Thomas.

During 1987, MAAR Associates, Inc. (MAI) conducted a cultural resource evaluation survey for site 44PG299 at Fort Lee in Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluation survey consisted of both a physical examination of the site and an historic documents research. It was conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) and implementing regulations requiring federal agencies to inventory and evaluate all cultural resources located on property owned by the federal...


Phase II Archaeological Survey of a Defensive Earthwork, Site 44PG299, Fort Lee, Prince George County, Virginia (1988)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Harding Polk.

During 1987, MAAR Associates, Inc. (MAI) conducted a cultural resource evaluation survey for site 44PG299 at Fort Lee in Prince George County, Virginia. The evaluation survey consisted of both a physical examination of the site and an historic documents research. It was conducted in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) and implementing regulations requiring federal agencies to inventory and evaluate all cultural resources located on property owned by the federal...


PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT THE CAMPBELLTON SITE (38AK276), HAMMOND FERRY SOCCER COMPLEX AIKEN COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA (2004)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Ramona Grunden. Sean Norris.

"In October 2004, the City of North Augusta contracted with TRC to conduct Phase II archaeological investigations on portions of 38AK276, also known as Campbellton. The site was originally recommended potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) subsequent to a Phase I cultural resources survey conducted by AF Consultants (Drucker and Barr 2004). AF Consultants recommended either avoidance or additional investigations if avoidance was not possible. The City of North...


Photographs and Their Use in Contract Archeology (1982)
DOCUMENT Citation Only Nancy Peterson Walter.

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.