An Examination of Gallina Utility Ware: Vessel Morphology and Function

Summary

The morphology of a ceramic vessel is directly related to intended use, and potters consider function during manufacture. Functional types such as cooking vessels, ollas, water jars, seed jars, bowls, and pitchers, are common in our ceramic lexicon. However, the relationship between morphology and function is not always intuitive, especially when considering secondary function and special use. The Gallina (A.D. 1050-1300) produced a wide variety of utility wares, but archaeologists have conducted almost no research on the ceramic style, use-wear and function of these non-decorative vessels. How many different shapes of utility ware were utilized in Gallina country? How did the Gallina use these different morphological types? Do interpretations based on shape indicate something different than use-wear and residues? I examine whole vessels from the Gallina culture area and categorize them into morphological classes. I also compare sooting on these different morphological classes to evaluate actual use. I test whether or not vessels in the identified morphological classes were positioned over the fire in the same manner as evidenced by sooting patterns. Finally, a qualitative discussion of individual vessels allows for further interpretations about vessel use.

SAA 2015 abstracts made available in tDAR courtesy of the Society for American Archaeology and Center for Digital Antiquity Collaborative Program to improve digital data in archaeology. If you are the author of this presentation you may upload your paper, poster, presentation, or associated data (up to 3 files/30MB) for free. Please visit http://www.tdar.org/SAA2015 for instructions and more information.

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

• Its About Time: Contributions in Honor of Thomas C. Windes   •
• Society for American Archaeology 80th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (2015)

Keywords

Spatial Coverage