The Handaxe Aesthetic

Summary

Perhaps the most intractable puzzle of the Palaeolithic is the Acheulean handaxe. Despite a century and a half of scrutiny by several generations of archaeologists, a comprehensive understanding of these enigmatic but ubiquitous artifacts remains out of reach. The typological approach that dominated Palaeolithic studies for a century arguably generated more puzzles than it resolved (‘stasis’, the ‘Movius line’) and the functional/materialist approach simply confirmed that they were tools. Cognitive archaeologists have made some headway by treating handaxes as vehicles for studying issues in cognitive evolution, but many questions remain. One is the question of aesthetics. Though the term is avoided by many Palaeolithic specialists, it is nevertheless possible to document the emergence and development of an aesthetic component to handaxes. The nascent field of neuroaesthetics, and the perspective of embodied/extended cognition, combine to suggest a scenario in which the manufacture of handaxes provided the primary scaffold by which aesthetic appreciation evolved.

SAA 2015 abstracts made available in tDAR courtesy of the Society for American Archaeology and Center for Digital Antiquity Collaborative Program to improve digital data in archaeology. If you are the author of this presentation you may upload your paper, poster, presentation, or associated data (up to 3 files/30MB) for free. Please visit http://www.tdar.org/SAA2015 for instructions and more information.

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

• Society for American Archaeology 80th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA (2015)   •
• Cognitive Archaeology

Keywords