Reinterpreting the rise of the state in Mesopotamia as a self-organizing process engendered by the interaction of interpersonal behavior and religious eschatology

Author(s): D. Bruce Dickson

Year: 2015

Summary

Anthropologists have long used "integration theory" to explain the rise of the state in Mesopotamia. This perspective, derived from functionalism, structural-functionalism, general systems, or cultural ecology, sees state emergence as a response to problems of population growth, ecological distress, competition, warfare, or the need to organize long distance trade. Integration theory is thus "top down." That is, it posits that state governance is imposed upon a population as a social solution to one, or a series of, adaptive challenges. Largely ignored in integration theory is human agency. We propose a "bottom up" perspective that gives primacy to interpersonal interaction and religious ideology. Specifically, we posit that (a) the interpersonal behavior characteristic of irrigation agriculture in interaction with (b) the "judgmental" form of religious eschatology that is invariably present where such agriculture is practiced, engendered self-organizing or mufti-agent processes that led inexorably to the rise of the state in Mesopotamia.

SAA 2015 abstracts made available in tDAR courtesy of the Society for American Archaeology and Center for Digital Antiquity Collaborative Program to improve digital data in archaeology. If you are the author of this presentation you may upload your paper, poster, presentation, or associated data (up to 3 files/30MB) for free. Please visit http://www.tdar.org/SAA2015 for instructions and more information.

Cite this Record

Reinterpreting the rise of the state in Mesopotamia as a self-organizing process engendered by the interaction of interpersonal behavior and religious eschatology. D. Bruce Dickson. Presented at The 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, California. 2015 ( tDAR id: 397392)

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

Spatial Coverage

min long: 25.225; min lat: 15.115 ; max long: 66.709; max lat: 45.583 ;