Bone versus Stone Arrows and the Movement of the St. Lawence Iroquoians
Author(s): William Engelbrecht; Bruce Jamieson
Year: 2016
Summary
In the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries St. Lawrence Iroquoian populations gradually decline and disappear from their homeland at the same period that the Wendat and Iroquois Confederacies are evolving. One of the most striking differences between St. Lawrence Iroquoian assemblages and those of surrounding groups is the general absence of stone arrow points on the former. This paper considers the advantages and disadvantages of bone or antler versus stone tipped arrows. We argue that long, thin stone Madison points were more effective in warfare than the bone and antler arrows of the St. Lawrence Iroquoians. However, the ultimate cause for the movement of the St. Lawrence Iroquoians was likely their failure to develop a confederacy.
Cite this Record
Bone versus Stone Arrows and the Movement of the St. Lawence Iroquoians. William Engelbrecht, Bruce Jamieson. Presented at The 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, Florida. 2016 ( tDAR id: 405034)
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
Keywords
General
Arrow Points
•
Buffer zones
•
St. Lawrence Iroquoians
Geographic Keywords
North America - Northeast
Spatial Coverage
min long: -80.815; min lat: 39.3 ; max long: -66.753; max lat: 47.398 ;