Chasing Red Herrings Down the Kelp Highway: Paleoindian Migration via the Pacific Coast is Unproven and Improbable

Author(s): Stuart Fiedel

Year: 2018

Summary

Over the past two decades, migration of Paleoindian ancestors along the Pacific coast has become the dominant origin hypothesis mainly because: 1) arrival at Monte Verde by 14,300 cal BP (or even 19,000 cal BP, as recently claimed) requires a still earlier emigration from Beringia and 2) the alternative "ice-free corridor" ostensibly was not habitable by large herbivores before 13,000 cal BP. However, the coastal hypothesis cannot account for many inconvenient facts. These include: absence of pre-13,000 cal BP sites on long expanses of habitable and archaeologically visible coast, from the Aleutian Islands to the Atacama Desert; genomic evidence of all Native Americans’ descent from interior-adapted South Siberian and Clovis populations; and absence from coastal East Asia of both any credible ancestral non-microlithic archaeological complexes and the expected ancestral haplotypes (e.g., the Q-L330 male lineage) in ancient and recent genomes.

Cite this Record

Chasing Red Herrings Down the Kelp Highway: Paleoindian Migration via the Pacific Coast is Unproven and Improbable. Stuart Fiedel. Presented at The 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC. 2018 ( tDAR id: 442532)

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

Record Identifiers

Abstract Id(s): 20476