Is Human Presence Identifiable through the Spatial Composition of Proboscidean Bonebeds?

Author(s): Mackenzie DePlata-Peterson

Year: 2025

Summary

This is an abstract from the "SAA 2025: Individual Abstracts" session, at the 90th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology.

Across North America, there have been more than 75 proboscidean bonebeds with proposed evidence of human predation or scavenging (Grayson and Meltzer 2015). Only 14 of these sites are uncontested with strong evidence contributing to a collective agreement that these sites are indeed culturally associated (Grayson and Meltzer 2015). This leaves the vast majority of proboscidean bonebeds in a gray area with ambiguous evidence of human involvement and contested status. This research focuses on investigating human presence at proboscidean bonebeds across North America using a new method that statistically compares the spatial relationships between skeletal elements. For this study I selected 17 bonebeds that I georeferenced in QGIS, and for each, I analyzed skeletal completeness and dispersion using an algorithm I created in the R programming language. Results from this method suggest there are no strong indications of distinct spatial differences between a culturally associated and a natural proboscidean bonebed.

Cite this Record

Is Human Presence Identifiable through the Spatial Composition of Proboscidean Bonebeds?. Mackenzie DePlata-Peterson. Presented at The 90th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. 2025 ( tDAR id: 510847)

Record Identifiers

Abstract Id(s): 52763