Prehistoric (Culture Keyword)

DOCUMENT Full-Text Kathryn Puseman. Chad Yost. Melissa K. Logan.

Samples from units in three excavation blocks at site 45FS2075 in northeast Washington were examined for charcoal and other macrofloral remains. This site appears to represent pre-contact through contact period occupations. The excavation blocks contained several diffuse hearths consisting of concentrations of fire-cracked rock and bone. Charcoal or charred botanic remains from 34 samples were submitted for AMS radiocarbon dating. In addition, six lithic artifacts were sampled for protein...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Jeffrey Altschul. Helen C. Fairley.

The region encompassing the land north and west of the Colorado River in the State of Arizona is the subject of this Class I cultural resources overview. This region, commonly referred to as the Arizona Strip, contains approximately 3.5 million acres, of which 2.75 million acres are administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 650,000 acres are under the jurisdiction of the USDA Forest Service, and the balance is controlled by various State and Federal agencies, Indian tribes, and...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Raymond D. Pasquariello.

Between December 2003 and March 2004, TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) conducted a Planning Level (Phase I) Cultural Resource Survey for approximately 162 hectares (400 acres) of selected, discontiguous tactical training areas. This survey was performed for the Fort Dix Directorate of Public Works/Environmental Division and represents partial fulfillment of Fort Dix’s ongoing cultural resources compliance under Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Raymond D. Pasquariello.

Between December 2003 and March 2004, TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) conducted a Planning Level (Phase I) Cultural Resource Survey for approximately 162 hectares (400 acres) of selected, discontiguous tactical training areas. A total of 56 separate archaeological sites and isolated finds were encountered during this investigation. Of this total, 25 were previously known sites (22 historic and three prehistoric) that were specifically slated for systematic shovel testing. The remaining 31...

DOCUMENT Full-Text George Price. Karen Payne.

This is a report of findings resulting from the 2007 archaeological investigations at Middle Place conducted by Apalachee Research Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Funding for the project derives from the Coastal Incentives Grant (CIG) awarded the Georgia Coastal Management Program. The field work was conducted and March, 2007. This is first investigation to focus o site' occupation and the first to employ systematic shovel testing. A total of 21 shovel tests and two 1x2 m...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ronnie Rogers.

Creating an archaeological resource map of Ossabaw for ArcInfo database

DOCUMENT Full-Text Maryland Historical Trust.

This is the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Archeological Site Survey, Basic Data Report for the Site T3, 18CH215. This site is located on the north bank of the Potomac River about 200m east of the tip of Blossom Point, between the river's edge and a lookout tower. It covers an area 100 feet long and 50 feet wide. The midden is characterized by a thin shell cap, 6-8 inches in thickness. Shells within this cap are whole to broken valves scattered throughout the lens. The surface of...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steve Wilke.

This report is a Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Archeological Site Survey, Basic Data Report for the site W-T, CH-K13, 18CH158. This site lies on the north bank of the Potomac River, on the south end of Cedar Point Neck, about 500m northwest of Upper Cedar Point, at the southwest comer of two small dirt roads. No size is indicated for this site. The only artifacts recovered are quartz and quartzite flakes and chunks. No diagnostics were recovered.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steve Wilke.

This report is a Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Archeological Site Survey, Basic Data Report for the site W-T, CH-K12, 18CH159. This site lies on the north bank of the Potomac River, on the south end of Cedar Point Neck, about 450m northwest of Upper Cedar Point at the edge of a marsh. Wilke and Thompson reported the location of this site, but no information associated with it. Geo-Recon found a small prehistoric lithic scatter here in 1980, consisting of quartz and quartzite...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Maryland Historic Trust.

This report is a Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Archeological Site Survey, Basic Data Report for the site T14, 18CH226. This site is located on the east side of Cedar Point Neck, about 150m northwest of the Potomac River. A marshy unnamed tributary of the river lies 250m to the east. The site lies in a disced firebreak and is bisected by a road. The site is probably confined to plowzone. This prehistoric lithic scatter, like 18CH225, has been disced and bisected by a road. Its...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Maryland Historic Trust.

This report is a Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Archeological Site Survey, Basic Data Report for the site T16, 18CH228. This site is located on the east side of Cedar Point Neck, 200m west of the Potomac, and about 1.3 km north of Upper Cedar Point. The site is in a disced firebreak and is bisected by a road. This prehistoric lithic scatter extends for some 2,000 feet along a facility access road. Prehistoric artifacts were discovered in disced firebreaks which parallel the road...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Stephen S. Israel.

Archeological site survey basic data report for site 18MO394 (Hillendale Run Site No. 2). The site includes both a prehistoric lithic scatter and late 18th-early 19th century artifact scatter. A total of 4 shovel test pits were excavated and 11 prehistoric artifacts were collected. Quartz flakes total eight of the finds. The remaining prehistoric artifacts include one quartzite flake (core fragment?) and two worked quartz flakes. A total of 7 historic artifacts were collected. Five were...

IMAGE Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory.

Images of miscellaneous artifacts from Old Baltimore (18HA030), Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, US. This includes decorations, glass artifacts, building materials and gun flints.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Patrick M. McLoughlin.

From March 18 to April 2, 2002, personnel from Prewitt and Associates, Inc., conducted National Register of Historic Places eligibility testing of two prehistoric sites located on Fort Sam Houston in Bexar County, Texas. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, sponsored the project as a result of the proposed plan to construct a fence across part of Fort Sam Houston near site 41BX1209. Site 41BX1407 would not be impacted by the fence but was included as part of this testing...

PROJECT Uploaded by: Rachel Black

New Echota Historic Site, Gordon County, Georgia

DOCUMENT Citation Only Uploaded by: system user

This resource is a citation record only, the Center for Digital Antiquity does not have a copy of this document. The information in this record has been migrated into tDAR from the National Archaeological Database Reports Module (NADB-R) and updated. Most NADB-R records consist of a document citation and other metadata but do not have the documents themselves uploaded. If you have a digital copy of the document and would like to have it curated in tDAR, please contact us at comments@tdar.org.

PROJECT Duane Simpson.

This project sought to develop a non-invasive means to identify the locations of prehistoric and historic human burials using geophysical and soil chemistry. With field investigations conducted at rockshelters, open air sites, and historic cemeteries, geophysical investigations were very effective in identifying burials and other cultural features at all site types. Chemical analysis of the soil to verify burial locations appears to hold greatest promise in historic burials.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Duane Simpson. Ryan Peterson.

This project sought to develop a non-invasive means to identify the locations of prehistoric and historic human burials using geophysical and soil chemistry. With field investigations conducted at rockshelters, open air sites, and historic cemeteries, geophysical investigations were very effective in identifying burials and other cultural features at all site types. Chemical analysis of the soil to verify burial locations appears to hold greatest promise in historic burials.

PROJECT Uploaded by: Rachel Black

Ossabaw Island State Land Files

DOCUMENT Full-Text David Waller.

Development and Management Plan for Ossabaw Island

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Black

Description of Periodic Subsistence and Settlement Patterns

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Black

This report provides an overview of limited archaeological investigations carried out on Ossabaw Island by the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA), Georgia Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division, in 2001-2002. Ossabaw Island is managed by DNR's Wildlife Resources Division (WRD). Initial investigations were precipitated by erosion at 9CH155, located on a bluff overlooking Newell Creek at the southern end of the island. The erosion exposed Indian burials, and recovery...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Daniel Elliott.

This report documents a recent l y completed archaeological project by The LAMAR Institute on a portion of the Newell Creek site (9CH 155) on Ossabaw Island, Chatham County, Georgia (Figures I and 2). The Newell Creek site is located on the southern portion of Ossabaw Island on an elevated bluff above Newell Creek. This multi-component site is actively eroding along the creek bank and human burials are among the casual ti es of this natural geo-morphological process. Once the Historic...

DOCUMENT Full-Text [NFM] Various.

General Information about Archaeology and Background on the Coastal History of Ossabaw Island for the 2002 Boy Scout Project

DOCUMENT Full-Text David C. Crass. Chip Morgan.

Correspondence and Report Draft