Bexar County (County) (Geographic Keyword)
1,801-1,825 (2,246 Records)
Correspondence citing need for better coordination between departments in the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from Emmitt Smith to Curtis Tunnell, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
Correspondence including three engineering studies conducted on Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Project Review for Cold War-Era Building and Structure Inventory and Assessment, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2003)
The review staff from the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bob Brinkman, has reviewed the submitted information and concur with the determinations of eligibility including that of Building 40 and Building 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Bruce R. Nadler, Project Review of New Canopy and Alterations to Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bradford Patterson, has completed its review of the proposed alterations to Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed alterations will have no adverse effect on Hangar 63 or its National Historic Landmark District.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Colonel Patrick, Project Review of Flagstone Sidewalks, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received a submittal from Randolph Air Force Base to replace the historic flagstone sidewalks with concrete. After review, and because of the sidewalks' installation in the 1930s, the Commission sees the existing flagstone sidewalks as a contributor to the character of the district and their replacement with concrete does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The standards...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Determination for Rehabilitation of Building 128 (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received further correspondence from Fort Sam Houston regarding the undertaking for Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and the proposed changes to Building 128 will cause no adverse effect on the historic building or the historic district. Copied to this letter is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided. This letter details the Commission's concerns and recommendations for the proposed undertakings. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project of Building 2000-2001's rehabilitation. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and requests more information before a final review can be completed of the project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project to rehabilitate Building 2264. The Commission's review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and have written this letter outlining its concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Theatre 1 Building 2270, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review for the rehabilitation of Theatre #1, Building 2270, at Fort Sam Houston. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and has determined that sufficient information has not been provided to complete the review of the project. This letter serves as comment and gives a list of requests for correct documentation. Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Revise for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston further correspondence and revisions for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001. This letter seres as additional comment and lists concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the rehabilitation of Building 128. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking including proposed changes from the State Historic Preservation Officer.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas A. Biggerstaff, Project Review for the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking of the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Draft Memorandum of Agreement for the Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the draft Memorandum of Agreement for the demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102. The Commission approves of the draft MOA, but requests specific language be used in Stipulation I (detailed in this letter). Copied to this correspondence is Jill Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nichols (Bexar County...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Environmental Assessment Document for New Housing Construction in Patch-Chaffee Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the environmental assessment from Fort Sam Houston for proposed new housing construction in the Patch-Chaffee Area at Fort Sam Houston. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Memorandum of Agreement Building 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission received from Fort Sam Houston correspondence describing Building 5002. After review, the Commission has signed the Memorandum of Agreement submitted for the demolition of Building 5002 at Camp Bullis.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, MOA on Demolition of Building 1030, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's request for a signature of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow the demolition of Building 1030. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission is specifically writing to halt the demolition of Building 1030 since the MOA originally allowing the undertaking was signed in error.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Building 1030 HABS Documentation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the undertaking for Building 1030. The Commission has reviewed the documentation provided an agrees that it fulfills Fort Sam Houston's obligation to provide HABS documentation per the Memorandum of Agreement concerning the proposed demolition of the historic property.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for NEPA Final Draft Including Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, as well as their associated Memorandum of Agreement. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anna McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Pending Environmental Assessment of Proposed Access Control Measures, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.