Bexar County (County) (Geographic Keyword)
2,126-2,150 (2,843 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the Advance Final Design for the structural repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A, 121B, 121C, 121D, 167, 172A, 172B, 172C, and 172D. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for this work.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Annual Report, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the annual report of activities effecting cultural resources. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is James Bruseth (Archeology Division) and Lee Keatinge (ACHP).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Parking Pads Near Buildings 2279-2284, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission a project review for parking pads near Buildings 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, and 2284. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston for window replacement in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submittal from Fort Sam Houston for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Replace Windows in Building 2376 Correction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a project review for window replacement in Building 2376. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Update on Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the updated information package submitted by Fort Sam Houston for the proposed window replacement in Building 2792. After review, the Commission has determined that the project, as currently proposed, would have an "adverse effect" on the building. The letter lists in detail the reasons for the Commission's determination.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review for Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the draft report, "Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis Military Reservation, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas." The Commission concurs with the determinations of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This letter serves as comment on the draft from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review of Revised Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the revised draft report of the Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites at Camp Bullis Military Reservation. The Commission concurs with the determination of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Copied to this correspondence is Jackie Schlatter (Fort Sam Houston) and Ross Fields (Prewitt and Associates, Inc.).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Proposed Review for New Housing Units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received additional information from Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed new housing units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area. The project proposes to build sixty new single family housing units. Based on the information provided, the Commission has determined that this project will have no adverse effect on historic properties at Fort Sam Houston.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Wendy Martinson, Project Review for Draft EA and FONSI for Proposed Consolidated Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Fickel, Project Review for Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the proposed undertaking of Karsts Research at Camp Bullis. The Commission suggests that a Programmatic Agreement be developed to govern standard operating procedures when human remains or artifacts are disturbed during karst excavations at Camp Bullis.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review of Demolition of Buildings 4226 and 2013-2017 Beebe Loop, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the project review for the demolition of Buildings 4226, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 at Beebe Loop. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Loyce Ince, San Antonio Conservation Society.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Demolition and Selective Demolition Proposals, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical has received and reviewed a recent letter from Fort Sam Houston regarding demolition and selective demolition of historic properties. These actions are proposed to take advantage of facility reduction dollars available for this fiscal year. This letter outlines the Commission's detailed comments for each property under consideration for the proposed undertaking.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Rehabilitation of Building 1026, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review document from Fort Sam Houston regarding the rehabilitation of Building 1026. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" on the historic resource.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Tour Thank You, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1998)
The Texas Historical Commission wrote this thank you to Fort Sam Houston for their hosted tour of the installation's historic resources and leading-edge medical facilities.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Buildings 200 and 671 Alterations Without Prior Consultation, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2002)
This letter addresses the recently completed alterations at Randolph Air Force Base including Buildings 200 and 671. This document is part of a collection of memos, notes and original memorandums related to recent undertakings in Buildings 200 and 671, structures at Randolph Air Force Base that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Leonard Patrick, Proposed Elevator Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission completed its review of the document package of the proposed project of an elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission does not agree with Randolph's determination of No Adverse Effect and has written this letter at length to discuss the Commission's reasoning. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the southwest corner of the secondary elevation of Building 900,...
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.
Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from Jackie Schlatter to Mike Johnson, Fort Sam Houston ICRMP Discussion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
Multiple correspondence concerning ICRMP specifics including dates of the amended PA, providing correct documentation to the SHPO and the need for a MACOM review of the final document. Copied to these letters is Joseph Murphey.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Camp Bullis Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Planning Division at Fort Worth, Texas, sent a draft of the Cultural Resource Management Plan to the Texas Historical Commission for review. The Commission believes that this document should be revised in accordance with enclosed recommendations to clarify issues and major topics.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Final Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston the final prehistoric research context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston. The document will be added to the Commission's library.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula, Comments on Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Programmatic Agreement (1993)
The Texas Historical Commission, Department of Antiquities Protection, has read and reviewed “Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston,” focusing on the prehistoric archeology of the two installations. The Commission notes that a similar overview for the historic archeological record has not been covered and asks what is the nature of the historic archeological data base. The Commission is in agreement with the basic conclusions of the study regarding the potential...