Texas (State / Territory) (Geographic Keyword)
20,926-20,950 (24,688 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.
Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from Jackie Schlatter to Mike Johnson, Fort Sam Houston ICRMP Discussion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
Multiple correspondence concerning ICRMP specifics including dates of the amended PA, providing correct documentation to the SHPO and the need for a MACOM review of the final document. Copied to these letters is Joseph Murphey.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Camp Bullis Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Planning Division at Fort Worth, Texas, sent a draft of the Cultural Resource Management Plan to the Texas Historical Commission for review. The Commission believes that this document should be revised in accordance with enclosed recommendations to clarify issues and major topics.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Final Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston the final prehistoric research context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston. The document will be added to the Commission's library.
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula, Comments on Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Programmatic Agreement (1993)
The Texas Historical Commission, Department of Antiquities Protection, has read and reviewed “Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston,” focusing on the prehistoric archeology of the two installations. The Commission notes that a similar overview for the historic archeological record has not been covered and asks what is the nature of the historic archeological data base. The Commission is in agreement with the basic conclusions of the study regarding the potential...
Response from James Bruseth to Cornelius Allen, Programmatic Agreement, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (1988)
Correspondence between the Texas Historical Commission and Directorate of Engineering and Housing at Fort Sam Houston concerning a programmatic agreement received by the Commission. Listed are general and specific comments by the Texas Historical Commission. Carbon copied to this letter is Paul McGuff, Bob Fink, and Stan Graves.
Response from James Bruseth to Lisa Orlando, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
This letter, written by the Texas Historical Commission, gives a brief overview of the Fort Sam Houston Property. The correspondence was written for Lisa A. Orlando, Environmental Scientist, BSA Environmental Services, Inc..
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Ensch, Draft Report: A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season, Camp Bullis, Texas (1998)
The Texas Historical Commission has received the draft archeological survey report from Fort Worth titled "A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season." The Commission wrote this letter to state their agreement with the conclusions of the authors of the report, which have been endorsed by the COE-FWD, and reviewed and approved by the Commission's National Register Division. Copied to this correspondence is Ross C. Fields and Karl W. Kibler, Co-Principal...
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Mocek, Draft Report of Archaeological Survey, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
The Texas Historical Commission has reviewed the draft report entitled "Camp Bullis Archeological and Historical Investigations, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas: The 1989 Season."They find the report to be thorough and it is agreed that the assessment of the resources, specifically of the prehistoric and historic sights, is correct concerning their inclusion or non-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from James Graham to Emily Payne, Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission requested an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) relative to Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston. Because the old laundry facility site has been polluted with cleaning solvents over the course of time, the remaining portions of the building must be demolished in order to facilitate remediation of the property, and thus the need for an amendment. This letter contains the requested MOA amendment.
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Roof Replacement at Building 4192, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
Fort Sam Houston provided the Texas Historical Commission with proposed design options for a roof replacement at Building 4192. This letter by the Commission stresses the importance of the roof replacement and that it may have a "profound" effect on the appearance of the historical building. The letter goes on to detail a review by the National Register Department.
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to William Fickel, Building 371 Comments, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
The Department of Architecture and the National Register Department of the Texas Historical Commission have written a letter of comments for the project involving Building 371. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger (Fort Sam Houston Preservation Architect) and Joseph Murphy (Fort Worth Corps of Engineers).
Response from James Steely to Joseph Logan, Building 156, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
The National Register Department has conducted a review of Building 156 and has designated it as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive documentation concerning Building 156, a World War II temporary building at Randolph Air Force Base. Most of the documents focus on the building's status in the National Register of Historic Places, as well as a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 156.
Response from Jessica Villarreal to Dee Brame, Alter Repair and Remove Asbestos Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base writes to recommend that the suspension of work be partially lifted and list in this letter the changes to be made by contractors within 7 working days. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter addressing the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building's interior and exterior features were rehabilitated prior to the completion of the Section 106 process. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and includes location maps,...
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter with attachments that outline and give full detail on the proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments to these letters include location maps, historic data, undertaking description, and photographs. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter from Randolph Air Force Base to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that details newly established steps to assist in meeting the requirements of Sections 110 and 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangar 12 Interior, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base is writing the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation to offer summary documentation on a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate the interior of Hangar 12. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangars 12, 13, and 64, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A letter in response to a sent Memorandum of Agreement for the proposed undertakings at Hangars 12, 13, and 64, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic reservation has reviewed the document and see it as generally acceptable. Included in the letter are some suggestions on how to improve the Memorandum of Agreement. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed...
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Window Replacement at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking to replace the 80 original exterior windows in Building 661. This letter details the decision of adverse effect for the project. This letter is part of a group of notes and letters on the proposed rehabilitation and replacement of the eighty original exterior windows at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The proposed undertaking is under the SABER Contract.
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Adverse Effect Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
This letter, written by Randolph Air Force Base, concerns an adverse effect determination by the Texas Historical Commission on the undertaking to rehabilitate Building 901. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Building 598 Patio Tile Replacement, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking that may effect Building 598, built in the early 1930's, which is known to be potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning the proposed patio tile replacement at Building 598, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The historic structure is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and these letters discuss the possible effect the...