Assessing Ephemeral Sites: Questions That Count in Cultural Resource Management
Part of: Society for Historical Archaeology 2014
As archaeologists working in cultural resource management we are called upon to assess the potential research value of the resources encountered during survey. An unfortunate reality is that we do not have the luxury of taking the stance that all archaeological sites have potential research value. We judge the merits of these sites against the criteria for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The more material you find at a site the easier it is to assess. This has the potential to bias the sites we investigate towards ‘richer’ sites and as a result sites with lower densities of materials are too often discounted and not properly considered. These ephemeral sites may represent cultural groups or activities that would go undocumented without archaeological investigation. This session is meant to restart a dialogue that emerges periodically within the field and to present strategies for assessing these ephemeral sites in the context of CRM archaeology.
Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 1-8 of 8)
- Documents (8)
- Complexity Begets Ambiguity: Small Site Archaeology and NRHP Significance (2014)
- The Disappearing Legacy of the CCC: Spike Camps and missing material culture at Mount Rainier (2014)
- Herding Brick Bits: Ephemeral Historic Sites in the Chesapeake (2014)
- Identifying and Delineating Building Locations on Low-Density Sites Using a Metal Detector (2014)
- Incorporating Ephemeral-ness: Archaeology of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Museum (2014)
- Making Do With So Very Little: A Consultant’s Look at Homestead Archaeology in Eastern Alberta (2014)
- The Site With the Most Stuff Wins: Assessing Ephemeral Sites for the National Register (2014)
- Testing Predictive GIS Models and Game Theory: A Case Study of the Simpson Lot, an Antebellum Industrial Homestead Site (2014)