Testing the Utility of Rib Histology Methods in Age Estimation in Fragmentary Remains from Maya Rockshelter Burials
Poor skeletal preservation is a ubiquitous problem in the Maya area, complicating the use of macroscopic techniques aimed at producing age range estimates. An important, but underutilized, set of skeletal approaches to aging employ microscopic methods, which rely on quantifying age-related histomorphological changes. This study focuses on histological structures in ribs and has two objectives: 1) to refine age estimations for burials from two rockshelters in the Caves Branch River Valley, Belize using regression formulas derived from contemporary Maya populations (Pavon et al. 2010); and 2) to explore the importance of sampling location in the application of these formulae. The method of Pavon et al. (2010) suggests using the midshaft of the fourth rib, but ancient Maya remains are often too fragmentary to confidently seriate and/or the midshaft may be absent. In an effort to determine whether the lack of locational consistency negatively affects this method, a modern anatomy sample of known age-at-death was sampled along the entire shafts of all ribs at increments of 20mm, noting intra-individual variability in comparison to the fourth rib midshaft.
SAA 2015 abstracts made available in tDAR courtesy of the Society for American Archaeology and Center for Digital Antiquity Collaborative Program to improve digital data in archaeology. If you are the author of this presentation you may upload your paper, poster, presentation, or associated data (up to 3 files/30MB) for free. Please visit http://www.tdar.org/SAA2015 for instructions and more information.
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
Cite this Record
Testing the Utility of Rib Histology Methods in Age Estimation in Fragmentary Remains from Maya Rockshelter Burials. Amy Michael, Bethany Slon, Rachel McConnell. Presented at The 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, California. 2015 ( tDAR id: 397369)
min long: -107.271; min lat: 12.383 ; max long: -86.353; max lat: 23.08 ;