A Bayesian Solution to the Controversy over the Identification of Bone Surface Modification in Paleoanthropology
Bone surface modification (BSM) remains a primary source of taphonomic inference in paleontological and archaeological contexts. However long-standing debates in BSM studies have undermined the utility of this approach. We use an objective machine-based learning algorithm rooted in Bayesian probability theory designed to quantify the level of uncertainty associated with a formal assignment of agent to individual BSM. Our multivariate Bayesian model, trained on large assemblages of experimentally generated BSM, accurately assigned agent of modification to an out-of-sample test with an average of 86.5% accuracy. Here we present the results of our updated probability model. We improved upon our existing model with the introduction of novel variables and an increased sample of experimentally generated training data produced by Nile crocodile feeding, spotted hyena feeding, large ungulate trampling, and human unmodified rock butchery. Here we also present the posterior distributions of model parameters associated with the morphology of individual BSM. Certain BSM attributes frequently associated with stone tool butchery marks (e.g. perpendicular orientation relative to the long axis of the bone, occur as a result of non-human agents of modification. Here we quantify the probability that key attributes are likely to occur with each respective agent of modification.
Cite this Record
A Bayesian Solution to the Controversy over the Identification of Bone Surface Modification in Paleoanthropology. Curtis Marean, Jacob Harris, Jessica Thompson, Kiona Ogle. Presented at The 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia. 2017 ( tDAR id: 430386)
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
min long: -18.809; min lat: -38.823 ; max long: 53.262; max lat: 38.823 ;
Abstract Id(s): 15458