Is the Study of Ancient Money Really So Difficult?
Author(s): Robert Rosenswig
Year: 2018
Summary
The difficulty that many economists and anthropologists have with studying ancient money lies with inadequate understanding of modern monetary systems. I briefly review the establishment of two currencies: the British pound in the 18th century and the US dollar in the 19th and why the establishment both currencies were political (not economic) constructs. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) economists analyze the current fiat currencies as political constructs and David Graber’s Debt: The First 5000 Years provides a historical perspective that undermines classical and neo-classical economists’ assumptions of the subject matter. Most discussion by both economists and anthropologists are limited to written accounts. Therefore, I next turn to our ability as archaeologists to investigate money in Prehistoric contexts and employ the Formative-period kingdom of Izapa (800-100 BC) and the early cities on the Pacific coast of Mesoamerica as forum for this to be done.
Cite this Record
Is the Study of Ancient Money Really So Difficult?. Robert Rosenswig. Presented at The 82nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC. 2018 ( tDAR id: 443640)
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
Keywords
General
Formative
•
Political economy
•
Urbanism
Geographic Keywords
Mesoamerica: Pacific Coast
Spatial Coverage
min long: -109.226; min lat: 13.112 ; max long: -90.923; max lat: 21.125 ;
Record Identifiers
Abstract Id(s): 20144