Texas (State / Territory) (Geographic Keyword)
20,876-20,900 (24,688 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Switching Facility in Expanded NHL District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed new switching facility near the old Brooke Army Medical Center. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the expanded Historic Landmark District.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Building 5101, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking to demolish the building - specifically a request to incorporate the historic building into a new proposed dining facility, rather than demolish Building 5101. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Buildings 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101 and Building 5002. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Texas.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's latest information package for the Rehabilitation of Building 2264. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission states that the proposal, as presented, is not at a stage of development to make a formal determination of effect on the building and requests complete plans when they are...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Report for the Stabilization of the Gift Chapel Building 2200, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the report for the stabilization of the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposal for Privatization of Water Supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston requesting a determination of effect for the privatization of the water supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis on National Register eligible Buildings 3186, 2600, 2194, 6210, 6211, and HLF: L-28. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 238 and 240. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and requests photographic documentation for both buildings in order for the review to proceed. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have outlined their recommendations. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission's staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have determined that it will have no adverse effect on the historic property. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreements for Brooke Army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion North and South Buildings, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the Brooke army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion. The Commission staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and this letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for 65 Percent Construction Document Submittal for Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1. After review, the Commission has determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the historic theater. Copied to this correspondence is Michael Pumphrey, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the subject undertaking will require an amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330, due to PCE contamination. This letter serves a comment on the proposed undertaking and includes the signed amendment to the Memorandum associated with this undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio Conservation Society, and the City of San Antonio Historic Preservation Office.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Family Housing Unit Types, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of family housing unit types at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has completed its review of the documentation provided and has determined that the subject undertaking will have no adverse effect upon the specified housing in the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District, providing that the listed conditions in this correspondence are met.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Use of Building 6202, 6203, 6204 Officer's Quarters for MUAC Training, Camp Bullis, Texas (2004)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed project to use Buildings 6202, 6203, and 6204 Officer's Quarters for MUAC Training. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jack Higgins, Project Review for Building 601 and 602 Rehabilitation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
This letter serves as comment to Fort Sam Houston on their proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Buildings 601 and 602. Comments and concerns are addressed by the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schatter, Project Review for the Addition of a Canopy at Building 368, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission as completed its review of the proposed undertaking to add a canopy to Building 368. The Commission concurs with the determination that the proposed undertaking will have "no adverse effect" on the building, which is a contributing structure to the potential National Register District. Copied to this correspondence is Joan Gaither, Society for the Preservation of Fort Sam Houston.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Further Project Review on Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed Karst Research at Camp Bullis. The Texas Historical Commission would very much like to establish and refine standard operating and documentation procedures when human remains are encountered during karst research work at Camp Bullis. Copied to this correspondence is Steve Austin and Dusty Bruns.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Project Review for Draft of Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the drafts of the Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plans. The Commission's review staff have recommendations regarding the archaeological, historical and architectural discussions within the ICRMP for Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis. This letter details these recommendations and concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Virginia Nicholas, Bexar County Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to James Graham, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Officers’ Club for Use as an RC1 Community Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2006)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of the Officers' Club for use as an RCI Community Center. The Commission has completed its initial review of the documentation provided and feel that the appropriate reuse of the building as a community center is feasible. The Commission requests additional information to determine the effects upon this cultural resource. Copied to this letter is David Brigham (Fort Sam...