Randolph Air Force Base (Geographic Keyword)
451-475 (757 Records)
This memo details the background, discussion, and recommendations for the proposed project of a four-foot chain link fence at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included are three detailed plans of the installation.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Historic Windows and Things Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
A meeting was held at the Texas Historical Commission to discuss Randolph Air Force Base's projects. This letter details the negotiations that took place during the meeting. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Installation of Fencecrete, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
This letter provides background, description of the current situation, and recommendations for a project to install fencecrete at select sites at Randolph Air Force Base. This correspondence also indicates that there was a determination of no adverse effect for the proposed undertaking.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Pre-cast Concrete Fence, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1994)
This letter gives an update on the information and plans for sitting the subject carports. The correspondence also lists requirements completed.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Section 106 Chain Link Fence Building 418, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
This memo concerns the involvement of Sharon Fleming, the project reviewer, in the installation of each fence in the historic housing neighborhoods in Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building specifically addressed in Building 418.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Section 106 Hangar 62, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
Internal coordination concerning the memorandum on a proposed project for Hangar 62 at Randolph Air Force Base.
Memo from Scott Shepherd, Section 106 Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
Internal coordination on the memorandum providing the State Historic Preservation Office with project information and it requests comments on the proposed design of a canopy at the southwest corner of Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Additionally, a double door will be cut into the hangar wall between the pillars.
Memo, Revised Section 106 Coordination on Project to Replace Tile Roofing on Historic Buildings, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1997)
The attached letter to the SHPO indicates our intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. In the original Section 106 letter to the SHPO in 1992 we indicated that we would use the original tiles if at all possible. In 1993, US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The sentence in the first Section 106 letter to the SHPO we sent to your office and was changed so...
Memo, Section 106 Coordination on Project to Replace Tile Roofing on Historic Buildings, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1997)
The attached letter to the SHPO spells out the intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The determination was No Adverse Effect; therefore, additional coordination with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is required.
Memorandum by Ritchey Woods, Disposition of Steel Framed Windows Removed from Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
Record of correspondence made in an effort to ascertain how and where the components for the original steel framed windows removed from Building 902 had been disposed of at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.
Memorandum for 902 CES/CEAN from 902 CES/CL, ESOHCAMP Management Action Plan with Root Cause Analysis, Randolph Air Force Base (2011)
In reference to the management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, this root cause analysis states that personnel were working under the impression that coordination was only required if the proposed project had a possible adverse effect on traditional religious or was of cultural importance. They overlooked the requirement to, “…meet periodically with each Indian Tribe”.
Memorandum for 902 CES/CEAN, ESOHCAMP Management Action Plan with Root Cause Analysis, Randolph Air Force Base (2011)
This memorandum gives a root cause analysis that the original Cultural Resources Management Plan was published in November 1996 and subsequently updated and replaced by the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) in July 2003. As required by AFI32-7065, 1 Jun 2004, paragraph 1.4.7.4, the ICRMP will be reviewed every five years; this action was completed 30 Oct 2008. Personnel were aware of the outdated mission statement; however, elected to wait final transformation and a Wing...
Memorandum for 902 CES/CEAN, ESOHCAMP Management Action Plan, Randolph Air Force Base (2011)
A management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, from south central Texas, emphasizing the desire to maintain an information conduit. The memorandum will explain that Randolph completed an archeological survey with negative findings of Native American traditional religious or of cultural importance. The memorandum will recognize the unique government-to-government relationship that exists between the federal government and tribes; it will be...
Memorandum for Hunt Building Company, Randolph Family Housing Scope of Work, Randolph Air Force Base (2011)
Memorandum from Cultural Resources Manager sent to Hunt Building Company regarding the involvement of Building 300 in a proposed Randolph Family Housing Scope of Work. It was determined Building 300 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the proposed Scope of Work and our discussion of the project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property or on the...
Memorandum from Bruce Nadler to F. Lawrence Oaks, Cutting of a Doorway on Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
This memorandum concerns the proposed construction of a canopy and the cutting of a double doorway on the secondary elevation of Hangar 63. Hanger 63 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The Base Civil Engineer determined an undertaking does exist with potential to affect historic properties.
Memorandum from Harry F. Finke, Paint Schemes Policy, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1994)
The following guidance are now policy to clarify current painting color schemes on the exterior of Randolph facilities. The current policy for painting facilities revolves around architecture compatibility. Randolph AFB basically employs a tri-color exterior scheme consisting of FED-STD 595 (Rev A) colors only. Approved schemes reflect changes in policy effective with this letter. Deviations from this policy require Wing Commander approval.
Memorandum from Harvey Browder to HERC Contractors, Amendment to Request for Proposal to Renovate Hangar 6 for IFF Beddown, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2008)
This memorandum addresses an amendment that was issued to add historical compliance requirements for the Hangar 6 entrance door at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Memorandum from Leon Spradling to Mark Wolfe, Construction of an Internal Elevator and Upgrade of the External Access Ramp Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed construction of an internal elevator and upgrade of the external access ramp at Building 100. Repair and Renovation of the antiquated electrical, electronic, security, water and sewer systems will be modernized. All steel casement windows will be repaired. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.
Memorandum from Neil Kanno to F. Lawerence Oaks, Installation of Quarry Tile on the Steps of Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
This memorandum concerns the installation of quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. After careful and in-depth consideration of this undertaking, Randolph determined there would be an effect. However, the effect would not result in the removal of the building from the Register or significantly distract from its character-defining features. As a result, the determination is No Adverse Effect. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.
Memorandum from Richard Trevino to F. Lawerence Oaks, Construction of a Handicapped Ramp Building 671, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2007)
This memorandum discusses the proposed construction of a handicapped ramp on the secondary elevation of Building 671, located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect" for the undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.
Memorandum from Richard Trevino to F. Lawerence Oaks, Functional Use of Hangar 70, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
This memorandum discusses the functional use of Hangar 70. Hangar 70 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Constructed in 1931 to store and repair aircraft, it was converted to a gymnasium circa 1942. In 2007, a new gymnasium (Fitness Center) was completed. This action will allow Hangar 70 is to be renovated and returned to function as an aircraft hangar.
Memorandum from Richard Trevino to F. Lawerence Oaks, Interior Rehabilitation and Restoration of Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2008)
This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed interior rehabilitation and restoration of Building 100, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined that the undertaking is "No Adverse Effect" and has provided in this letter summery documentation for review. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.
Memorandum from Richard Trevino to F. Lawrence Oaks, Undertaking at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2006)
This memorandum discusses an undertaking at Hangar 64, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Included is an undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.
Memorandum from Scott B. Shepherd III to Dwight Micklethwait, Rehabilitation of Hangar 70, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2009)
A review was conducted on Hangar 70 by applying procedures contained in the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR part 800 (Section 106), and the guidelines of Division Instruction 32-1 as they pertain to the effects of rehabilitation treatment measures criteria. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing...
Memorandum from Scott Shepherd to 12 MSG/CEO, Exterior Communications Board Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2009)
The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located within the Randolph Field Historic District. It was also determined that the proposed scope of work would have an adverse effect on the historic property or its district - this letter explains this decision.