Governmental Structure (Site Type Keyword)
Parent: Non-Domestic Structures
Locations, or the remains of buildings that were associated with governmental activities.
1,476-1,500 (1,839 Records)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans at the 50% level for the rehabilitation of Building 131 at Fort Sam Houston. It appears from the plans that a determination of "no adverse effect" will be determined, after a tour of the site by the Commission.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 2792 Wallpaper and Paint, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's proposal to wallpaper and paint the hallways in Building 2792. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no effect" on the historic structure.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Buildings 122, 124, and 125, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's alterations to Buildings 122, 124, and 125. All of the Commission's recommendations have been followed. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 Guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Raven Room Canopy Installation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the proposal to install a canopy over the entrance to the Raven Room at the Officers' Club. The Commission concurs with the determination of "adverse effect." This letter gives the Commission's recommendations for alterations to the proposal.
Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Confirmation of Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
A letter confirming a phone conversation in relation to the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning...
Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
A letter reviewing the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning duct work.
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition and Replacement of Building 2791, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the demolition and replacement of Building 2791, a Category I property located within the proposed expansion of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The information provided by Fort Sam Houston did not include an analysis of alternatives that may avoid or minimize the potential adverse effect of this undertaking. The Council requests that Fort Sam Houston inform the Society for...
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition of Building 238, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has received and reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the proposed demolition of Building 238, a Category I property located within the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Council is interested in the opinions of the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, and the San Antonio Conservation Society regarding the disposition and treatment of...
Response from Don Klima to Leonard Patrick, Building 900 Construction of Exterior Elevator, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2000)
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force's no adverse effect determination for the proposed construction of an exterior elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, TX. The Council does not agree with the Air Force's determination and has declared an adverse effect on the historic property. This letter explains in detail the Council's decision. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the...
Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Building 902 Alterations, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
A letter requesting a meeting between Randolph Air Force Base and the Texas Historical Commission staff to coordinate and discuss the proposed rehabilitation of Building 902. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.
Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Renovation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
This letter states the cooperation of Randolph Air Force Base with the Texas Historical Commission in coordinating undertakings, including projects involving doors and windows.
Response from Douglas Biggerstaff to Lawerence Oaks, Lease of Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Department of the Army at Fort Sam Houston has received the Texas Historical Commission's correspondence regarding the lease of Building 259. The letter is Fort Sam Houston's review and response to the Commission's comments. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical Commission and Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston review each other's comments and a draft of the lease agreement os included.
Response from Elizabeth Butman to Michael Grizer, Project Review of Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 133, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2012)
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Elizabeth Butman, has completed its review of project documentation received on January 17, 2012. Based on this material, the proposed undertaking consists of the rehabilitation of Building 133 for use as courthouse for the Staff Judge Advocate. This building is listed in the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Commission found that the proposed changes do not meet the...
Response from Emmitt Smith to Curtis Tunnell, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
Correspondence including three engineering studies conducted on Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Project Review for Cold War-Era Building and Structure Inventory and Assessment, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2003)
The review staff from the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bob Brinkman, has reviewed the submitted information and concur with the determinations of eligibility including that of Building 40 and Building 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Bruce R. Nadler, Project Review of New Canopy and Alterations to Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bradford Patterson, has completed its review of the proposed alterations to Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed alterations will have no adverse effect on Hangar 63 or its National Historic Landmark District.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Colonel Patrick, Project Review of Flagstone Sidewalks, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
The Texas Historical Commission has received a submittal from Randolph Air Force Base to replace the historic flagstone sidewalks with concrete. After review, and because of the sidewalks' installation in the 1930s, the Commission sees the existing flagstone sidewalks as a contributor to the character of the district and their replacement with concrete does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The standards...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Determination for Rehabilitation of Building 128 (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received further correspondence from Fort Sam Houston regarding the undertaking for Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and the proposed changes to Building 128 will cause no adverse effect on the historic building or the historic district. Copied to this letter is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided. This letter details the Commission's concerns and recommendations for the proposed undertakings. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project of Building 2000-2001's rehabilitation. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and requests more information before a final review can be completed of the project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this...
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project to rehabilitate Building 2264. The Commission's review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and have written this letter outlining its concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Revise for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
The Texas Historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston further correspondence and revisions for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001. This letter seres as additional comment and lists concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the rehabilitation of Building 128. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking including proposed changes from the State Historic Preservation Officer.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas A. Biggerstaff, Project Review for the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking of the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Draft Memorandum of Agreement for the Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the draft Memorandum of Agreement for the demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102. The Commission approves of the draft MOA, but requests specific language be used in Stipulation I (detailed in this letter). Copied to this correspondence is Jill Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nichols (Bexar County...