Making Sense of the Variation in Folsom Projectile Point Technology
Author(s): Robert Lassen
Analyses of Folsom projectile point technology generally focus on the making and use of the classic bifacially fluted form. Often some mention is made of Midland or unfluted points, but formal technological analyses of these types are rare. Utilizing a sample of 989 points and preforms from Folsom and closely related technologies, this research explores the variation that is present in Folsom point production. Points from Folsom contexts are divided into five types: Folsom, Midland, unifacially fluted, pseudo-fluted, and miniature. These types are then compared based on the following variables: width, thickness, basal width, and edge grinding to determine whether they share similar hafting characteristics. Flaking technology is also compared to explore overlaps in production techniques between the point types. Results indicate that overlapping reduction techniques do occur between all the point types, reinforcing the idea that Folsom, Midland, and the other forms were made and used by the same groups. However, slight differences in morphology between Folsom and Midland points may indicate that they were hafted differently.
SAA 2015 abstracts made available in tDAR courtesy of the Society for American Archaeology and Center for Digital Antiquity Collaborative Program to improve digital data in archaeology. If you are the author of this presentation you may upload your paper, poster, presentation, or associated data (up to 3 files/30MB) for free. Please visit http://www.tdar.org/SAA2015 for instructions and more information.
Cite this Record
Making Sense of the Variation in Folsom Projectile Point Technology. Robert Lassen. Presented at The 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, California. 2015 ( tDAR id: 395220)
This Resource is Part of the Following Collections
min long: -113.95; min lat: 30.751 ; max long: -97.163; max lat: 48.865 ;