Inference in Paleoarchaeology

Part of: Society for American Archaeology 86th Annual Meeting, Online (2021)

This collection contains the abstracts of the papers presented in the session entitled "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology.

In interpreting the archaeological record, archaeologists either explicitly or unknowingly construct inferences on the basis of referential knowledge or models that are external to that record. Common sources of this knowledge include experiments, ethnography, social studies, biological theories, and our own experiential logic. However, the application of these “middle-range theories” in interpreting emergent properties of the paleo-record often employs a single line of hypothetico-deductive reasoning as a direct path to all levels of behavioral interpretation. This risks reducing the complexity of record formation to singular explanations, and producing interpretations that are predetermined by the units of analysis of the models used. Our discipline has been aware of these theoretical and practical issues. Nonetheless, and despite the increasing multitude of available data and the variety of advanced analytical approaches, overcoming these issues when inferring past behavior is still extremely uncommon. With examples including stone, osseous, sediment, and other kinds of archaeological finds, we aim for presentations exploring and enacting different ways of alternating between the models and the data to construct archaeological inference.

Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 1-7 of 7)

  • Documents (7)

Documents
  • Cognitive Archaeology and the Minimum Necessary Competence Problem (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Ross Pain. Anton Killin.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Cognitive archaeology faces the problem of minimum necessary competence: as the most sophisticated thinking of ancient hominins may have been in domains that leave no archaeological signature, it is safest to assume that tool production and use reflects only the lower boundary of cognitive capacities. Cognitive archaeology involves selecting a model from...

  • Early Pleistocene Behavior and Archaeological Inference: Insights from Experiments (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only David Braun.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. The archaeology of human origins represents one of the key insights into what it means to be human. Despite this optimistic outlook, the archaeological record represents a dismally preserved record of untranslated objects. Archaeologists have become increasingly good at devising stories about the records of behaviors that our artifacts represent. However,...

  • Fracture Mechanics, Virtual Knapper, and Controlled Experiments: Toward a Better Model of Flake Formation (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Shannon McPherron.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Insights into flake formation have come from fracture mechanics, controlled experiments, replication studies, and attribute analysis of lithic assemblages. Fracture mechanics would seem to offer great potential for offering insights into how the variables that knappers manipulate actually change flaking outcomes, and its strength is that it is based on...

  • Is Analogical Reference Possible for the Earliest Paleoarchaeological Assemblages? (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Jessica Thompson.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. There is no consensus about how to define the first paleoarchaeological record, or how old it is. An assemblage of flaked stone artifacts from Lomekwi 3, Kenya, dates to 3.3 million years ago. Two fossil specimens at the 3.34-million-year-old site of Dikika-55, Ethiopia, preserve butchery marks on their surfaces. The strength of interpretation that these...

  • An Organization of Technology Model and Archaeological Inference (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Philip Carr.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. In the late twentieth century, the investigation of settlement patterns and mobility were considered important archaeological endeavors. Analyzing stone tools assemblages to make inferences of group mobility was based on utilizing simple dichotomies. For stone tools, the concepts of curated and expedient dominated thinking. Likewise, the constructs of...

  • Resilience and the Record: Suggestions for Application of Resilience Concepts to Archaeological Cases (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Benjamin Davies. Matthew Douglass.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Concepts from resilience theory (RT) have been variously applied in studies of the deep human past. Given emphasis on cross-scale interactions and cyclical trajectories, RT provides a framework to interpret historical sequences in terms of general ecological processes. However, less consideration has been given to the interface between the trajectories of...

  • The Role of Parsimony in Archaeological Inference Building (2021)
    DOCUMENT Citation Only Sam Lin. Alex Mackay.

    This is an abstract from the "Inference in Paleoarchaeology" session, at the 86th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. In archaeology, distinct processes in the past can generate similar patterning in the material record under varying temporal and spatial scales. Facing this challenge of equifinality, archaeologists frequently use parsimony to help assess competing explanatory models by preferring simpler explanations over more complex ones. However, there is little...