Phase 2 Data Recovery at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a Multicomponent Rockshelter at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona
Site Name Keywords
AZ T:4:150(ASM)
Site Type Keywords
Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex •
Domestic Structures •
Rock Shelter
Culture Keywords
Hohokam •
Historic •
Euroamerican •
Historic Native American •
Yavapai
Investigation Types
Data Recovery / Excavation
Material Types
Ceramic •
Chipped Stone •
Fauna •
Fire Cracked Rock •
Glass •
Ground Stone •
Macrobotanical •
Metal •
Pollen
Temporal Keywords
Historic Period •
Hohokam Colonial period •
Hohokam Early Classic period •
Protohistoric Period •
Gila Butte Phase
Geographic Keywords
Agua Fria River •
Yavapai County (County) •
Arizona (State / Territory) •
United States of America (Country) •
North America (Continent) •
Tule Creek •
Lake Pleasant Regional Park •
USA (Country)
Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 1-2 of 2)
There are 2 Documents within this Collection [remove this filter]
-
Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), a Multicomponent Hohokam, Yavapai, and Euroamerican Rockshelter Site at Lake Pleasant Regional Park, Yavapai County, Arizona (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: M Scott Thompson
At the request of the Bureau of Reclamation–Phoenix Area Office, ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]), Yavapai County, Arizona. Based on the results of Phase 1 investigations conducted at the site (Pinter et al. 2009), Reclamation determined that potentially significant subsurface cultural deposits were present that could provide important new data on prehistoric, protohistoric, and historic Native American and Euroamerican occupation of the...
-
Phase 2 Data Recovery Investigations at AZ T:4:150(ASM), A Multicomponent Rockshelter: Photo Log (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
ACS conducted Phase 2 data recovery at the Lake Pleasant Rockshelter site (AZ T:4:150[ASM]) in 2010 at the request of the Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office. The proposed work plan for Phase 2 (Pinter et al. 2009) was accepted by Reclamation, and was implemented in two sessions due to inclement weather and rising lake levels. The first session occurred in January 2010, followed by a hiatus to allow the lake level to drop and the weather to cool; the second and final session occurred in...