Little Rock Air Force Base Cultural Resources Archive

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

As a result of changes made to the final design of the proposed replacement of Runway 07-25, two areas were added to the original Phase I investigation, one at the east end of the infield, between Taxiway D and Taxiway E, and one at the west end of Runway 07-25. One archaeological site (3PU1074) was discovered and recommended not eligible.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Draft List of Facilities on Little Rock Air Force Base at or Approaching 50 years old by 2017 with National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Eligibility, SHPO Concurrence, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Program Contents.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Isla Nelson.

Between June 25 and July 12, 2019, Cardno conducted a Phase I archaeological survey at the request of the 19th Airlift Wing at Little Rock Air Force Base. The Base proposes to repair by replacement Runway 07-25 and associated overruns. No prehistoric cultural resources were encountered during the course of the archaeological investigation. A surface scatter of historic artifacts was identified in the southwest corner of the airfield and recorded as Site Number 3PU1041. Multiple undecorated...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Robert F. Cande. Steven Imhoff. Robert H. III Lafferty.

From July 16–21, 1997, Mid-Continental Research Associates (MCRA) conducted National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) evaluation of 3PU422, 3PU444, and 3PU450 at Little Rock Air Force Base, Jacksonville, Pulaski County, Arkansas. 3PU444 and 3PU450 do not meet the eligibility criterion and no further work is recommended. 3PU422 has significant research potential and is considered eligible for nomination to the NRHP. It is recommended that this site be protected from any adverse impacts and be...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Jessica Forbes.

Survey forms for a reassessment of 26 Cold War Era Buildings at Little Rock Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text John E. Chambers.

SHPO Correspondence regarding possible National Historic Landmark designation of Titan II Missile Complexes at the Pima Air Museum in Tucson, Arizona and Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Chris Branam.

At the request of Premier Engineering Corporation, Flat Earth Archeology, LLC conducted a Phase I cultural resources survey of approximately 7.28 hectares (ha) (18 acres [ac]) for the proposed 3-130J/J Fuselage Trainer Facility at the Little Rock Air Force Base in Pulaski County, Arkansas. Three concrete foundation remains were recorded as archeological sites during the current Phase I survey. Sites 3PU1035, 3PU1036, and 3PU1037 are all only foundation remains. No artifacts were found associated...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Maynard B. Cliff. Duane E. Peter. William David White, Jr.. Randall L. Guendling.

This document fulfills the requirement for a CRMP as set forth in AFI 32-7065. It is designed to be used by multiple audiences concerned with the management of historic properties at Little Rock AFB. These audiences include the Major Command (MAJCOM), Little Rock AFB staff, state and federal cultural resource managers, professional historic preservationists, and the general public. In this CRMP, Sections I and II are an executive summary and an introduction summarizing the major portions of the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Little Rock Air Force Base.

This ICRMP contains a series of compliance policies and standard operating procedures (SOPs) that will enable Little Rock Air Force Base to meet its legal responsibilities and to handle situations that may arise during the management of its cultural resources. It also provides management goals that will benefit the management of cultural resources at Little Rock Air Force Base. Included in the document is a five-year plan that outlines the types of projects likely to occur at Little Rock Air...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Bill Hersch.

As a part of the United States Air Force, Little Rock Air Force Base has many legal responsibilities related to the identification, preservation, and management of cultural resources on its lands. This updated Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan is intended to serve as the planning and guidance document that will assist the base in complying with Federal preservation requirements and Air Force policy directives. The Installation Commander has direct responsibility for implementing the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Bill Hersch.

Appendices for the 2012 Little Rock Air Force Base (LRAFB) ICRMP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Marsha Prior. Edward Salo. John Ferguson. Duane Peter. John Peukert.

This report is the 2005 Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for Little Rock Air Force Base which follows the guidelines as set forth in the revised AFI 32-7065. The text is designed to serve as a five-year plan for the integrated management of the historic properties contained within the limits of properties controlled by Little Rock AFB. The plan contains an introduction, a review of past cultural resources studies and their findings, and a management plan with standard operating...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Marsha Prior. Edward Salo. John Ferguson. Duane Peter. John Peukert.

Volume II of the 2005 Little Rock Air Force Base ICRMP. The appendices containing a glossary; detailed overviews of the cultural and physical environment and cultural resources inventory; list of Native American contacts; and overview of pertinent laws. The intended audience of this document is the Installation Commander, Little Rock AFB personnel involved in planning activities, and the cultural resources manager, who is the individual responsible for the day-to-day management of cultural...

PROJECT Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Project metadata for resources within the Little Rock Air Force Base cultural heritage resources collection.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Edward Salo. Marsha Prior. Joe C. Freeman.

This report provides an inventory and assessment of Cold War-era buildings and structures at Little Rock AFB, Arkansas. This work was conducted to assist the Air Education and Training Command in fulfilling its responsibilities under Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Out of a total of 320 Cold War-era buildings and structures at Little Rock AFB, 33 were identified as potentially significant Cold War resources and were thus evaluated for NRHP eligibility under Criterion...

DOCUMENT Full-Text J. Forbes. M. Prior.

A survey and reassessment of 26 buildings at Little Rock Air Force Base (AFB), Arkansas, was undertaken to assist Little Rock AFB in meeting the requirements of Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The 26 buildings reassessed were identified in the 2005 ICRMP as potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) once they turned 50 years of age. The purpose of the reassessment was to determine if the buildings met the requirements of...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Robert F. Cande.

Detailed scans of Figures 4 and 5 from the Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of Little Rock Air Force Base, Pulaski County, Arkansas report.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Robert F. Cande.

In 1995, Geo-Marine, Inc., under contract to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tulsa District, conducted an archeological survey of Little Rock Air Force Base, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and associated lands. As a result of this intensive survey, 37 previously unrecorded archeological sites and 16 non-site localities or isolated finds were located and recorded on Little Rock AFB. Of the 37 archeological sites that were located, three are presently identified as being entirely prehistoric in date,...

DOCUMENT Full-Text James A. Lowe. John A. Evaskovich. Katherine J. Roxlau.

Mariah Associates, Inc. conducted a cultural resource inventory at Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, between November 14 and 17, 1994 to identify extant Cold War resources important to the base, its history, and its Cold War mission. A variety of repositories were inventoried on base: the Wing History Office, Public Affairs Office, Civil Engineering Office and Drafting Department, Real Estate Office, and Environmental Office. Informal interviews were conducted with personnel long affiliated...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

An overview and directory of Little Rock Air Force Base for newly enlisted individuals, circa 1962.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Cathy Buford Slater.

SHPO correspondence regarding Little Rock Air Force Base National Register nominations for Building 430 and the Nose Core Trainer.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ken Grunewald.

SHPO correspondence regarding a new roof for Building 250 at the Little Rock Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Frances McSwain.

SHPO correspondence requesting concurrence of historic building determination at Little Rock Air Force Base for 26 buildings. The original report is included.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

SHPO correspondence regarding 50 structures at the Little Rock Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for Site 3PU0420. Site 3PU0420 is a historic site found on a raised terrace in a grassy pasture. This site appears to be severely disturbed by bulldozing, which probably occurred during the construction of Little Rock Air Force Base in 1954. Given this fact, 3PU0420 is not eligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for Site 3PU0421. Site 3PU0421 is the remnants of a historic structure found on the northern periphery of a terrace in a horse pasture in the east central part of Little Rock Air Force Base. The remnants of this structure consists of large, dressed sandstone slabs, which are up to 90 cm in length, found in bulldozed piles. Because of the disturbance to the site it is ineligible for inclusion to the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0422. Site 3PU0422 appears to be a lithic reduction site of an unknown prehistoric period. It was found by shovel testing on a pimple mound during a systematic survey of Little Rock AFB. Several dozer piles were found around the base of the mound. No clear evidence of disturbance was noted on the mound, although the area has probably been clear cut and/or cultivated in the past. A total of 10 shovel tests were dug at the site, six of which contained prehistoric artifacts up to...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for Site 3PU0423. Site 3PU0423 is the remains of a possible historic structure, which creates a small rise in a large terrace. The site area is used as a horse pasture. The remains of the structure consist of a dressed sandstone slab, frame foundation, which appears to have been bulldozed away. The foundation was designated feature 1. Feature 2 is a small circular depression about 5 m south of the south wall of the foundation. Due to limited integrity the site is ineligible for...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site Form for Site 3PU0424. Site 3PU0424 is a historic site found through judgmental shovel testing along 20 m transects at 20 m intervals. The site has been severely disturbed and artifacts are widely scattered. Bulldozing has nearly destroyed it. Because of this it is not eligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for Site 3PU0425. Site 3PU425 is a possible historic homestead found on top of a ridge top/terrace. The site may date to the 1930s and 1950s. Four features were observed at the site. Due to extensive disturbance it is considered ineligible for inclusion to the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for Site 3PU0426. Site 3PU0426 is a prehistoric site found on a pimple mound. Because of the low artifact density from the site, it's considered ineligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for Site 3PU0427. Site 3PU0427 is a historic homestead found on top of a ridge and along its north slope. Although the date of occupation is unknown, it appears to likely be from the 1920s to the 1940s. Because of the lack of subsurface deposits with only 10-15 of it intact, it's ineligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for Site 3PU0428. Site 3PU0428 is a historic residential site, probably part of the community of Macon Ark. There are four features identified for this site. Due to extensive bulldozing observed at the site (which is probably from the construction of the Air Force Base) the site only retains 10% contextual integrity. Due to this this site is ineligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for Site 3PU0429. Site 3PU0429 is located on the southeastern bench of a knob, just below the crest. The site appears to be a historic homestead, probably dating back to the 1930s to the 1940s. Considering the limited integrity and artifact density of the site it is ineligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for Site 3PU0430. Site 3PU0430 appears to be a historic residence, possibly dating back to the 1940s to the 1950s and probably associated with the community of Macon, AR which is presently 200-300 m north of the site. The site area has been so extensively disturbed by bulldozing that it is considered ineligible for inclusion into the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0431. Site 3PU0431 consists of several structural remnants and is thought to date late in the historic period. No function could be determined for the site, which appears to have suffered from extensive disturbance, with only an estimated 10% remaining intact. Therefore, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0432. Site 3PU0432 is a small lithic scatter of an unknown prehistoric period, which appears to be severely disturbed by clear cutting, bulldozing, levelling of Maintenance Station #99, deflation, and sheet erosion. It is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0433. Site 3PU0433 appears to be a site dating to late in the Historic period, late 19th/20th centuries. The site area appears to have been clear cut in the past. Any standing structures were razed, with only a few rubble piles of sandstone remaining. In view of the extensive bulldozing identified at the site, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0434. Site 3PU0434 is an extensive and elaborate historic site, probably a residence, with a total of seven features: 1) sandstone-lined cistern; 2) Concrete slab; 3) Sandstone and mortar foundation; 4) Partial sandstone and mortar wall; 5) Two large depressions; 6) Dry-laid stone wall; 7) Two Dry-laid stone walls. Due to the extensive bulldozing observed at the site, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP. No further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0435. Site 3PU0435 is a historic site, probably a residence which may date to the 1930s. The site is highly disturbed, with many dozer piles containing sandstone slabs and cobbles and bulldozer scars and has only an estimated 3-5% contextual integrity. Due to high degree of disturbance observed at the site, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0436. Site 3PU0436 is a historic residence or farmstead. Although the site has been severely impacted by bulldozing, two features remained to be identified. Feature 1 is a cistern, built of dressed, stacked-sandstone. Feature 2 appears to be a sandstone foundation. Unfortunately, the site only has an estimated 5-8% contextual integrity remaining, making it ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP. No further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0437. Site 3PU0437 is a historic residential site which appears to have been occupied late in the Historic period (ca. 1930s to 1950s). The site appears to have been leveled by heavy machinery down to ground surface, and is estimated to have 10% contextual integrity. Due to the extensive disturbance observed and the low density of artifacts observed, site 3PU0437 is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0438. Site 3PU0438 is a historic residential site or farmstead. The site area been severely impacted by bulldozing and burning. There is also a modern trash dump on top of the site. Due to the severe disturbance of the site and its relatively common site type, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0439. Site 3PU0439 is a historic site, probably occupied during 1930s to 1950s. The remnants of two structures were found at the site. The area has been clear cut in the past, and site integrity is estimated at 10% or less. In view of the limited integrity and the fact that the site does not appear to be particularly old or unique, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP. No further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0440. Site 3PU0440 appears to be a historic residence, with evidence of two structures. The site probably dates to the 1930s or 1940s, and may be associated with the 1945 Ordnance Plant. The site has been severely impacted by bulldozing, with only an estimated 8-10% of the site remaining intact. Due to the severe disturbance observed, the site is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0441. Site 3PU0441 is a historic, possibly post-1940s farmstead. The area appears to have been clear cut except for the immediately around the structures. There is evidence of plowed fields to the north and west. Some bulldozer piles were found in the site area. Contextual integrity is estimated at 10% or less. Due to the extensive disturbance observed and the apparently late period of occupation, the site is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site form for 3PU0442. Site 3PU0442 appears to be a 1930s to 1940s residence or farmstead. The site consists of the remains of a dressed sandstone and mortar foundation (which has been severely bulldozed) and a low to moderate density of subsurface artifacts. In view of the severe disturbance at the site and its mixing with a more modern occupation, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0443. Site 3PU0443 is a Historic site of unknown function dating to the 1940s or 1950s. Site integrity is estimated at 10% or less. There are two foundation, a small trash pile, a metal spring from a mattress, and a refuse pile of lumber and plywood. There is also some evidence of bulldozing in the area, such as small piles of soil and debris. Due to the extensive disturbance noted at site 3PU0443, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw.

Site Form for 3PU0444. Site 3PU0444 appears to be a 1940s to 1950s farmstead, probably associated with either the 1945 Ordnance Plant or the town of Taneyville. It consists of six features as well as an intact set of cement steps and a moderately dense subsurface artifact scatter. Unfortunately, the late occupation of the site and the disturbance noted are considered to make it ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0445. Site 3PU0445 appears to be a historic residence or homestead estimated occupation in the 1940s and 1950s. The site appears to have been leveled with heavy machinery and, considering the melted glass and burned sandstone, was also burned. In view of the extensive disturbance noted at the site and the late date of occupation, it is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and no further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0446. Site 3PU0446 appears to be a residential site, probably dating to the 1940s or 1950s. The structure has been highly impacted, as it appears to have been leveled by heavy machinery and the rubble removed, leaving the site with an estimated 3-5% contextual integrity. Given the extremely limited contextual integrity and the apparent late date of occupation, the site is considered to be ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and nor further work is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0447. Site 3PU0447 is a historic site dating from the 1940s to 1950s. The site area appears to have been clear cut, which may have promoted erosion and thus explaining the lack of soils at the site. The site consists of a rock-lined pathway, a badly collapsed depression, and a surface scatter of artifacts. Overall site integrity is estimated to be 2 to 5 percent. In view of the lack of contextual integrity and the late period of the site, it is considered to be ineligible for...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0448. Site 3PU0448 has multiple structures and may be multifunction, probably dating to the 1940s or 1950s. The site area appears to have been clear cut at some time and then kept clear. All structures have been leveled to ground level and mostly removed. These disturbances appear to have left the site at most 10 percent contextual integrity. The site may be part of Toneyville. Given the extensive disturbance noted at the site and presumed late date of occupation, it is...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0449. Site 3PU0449 appears to have been occupied late in the historic period and may not be of an age to make it eligible for inclusion on the NRHP. The remnants of two structures were found, along with a moderately dense surface scatter of trash. There is a lot of evidence for bulldozing in the area, leaving the site with only 5-10% contextual integrity. In view of the high degree of disturbance at the site and its apparent late date of occupation, it is considered to be...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0450. Site 3PU0450 historic site which appears to date between 1920 and 1954. There is a low density artifact scatter at the site, mainly on the surface, with ca. 90% of the artifacts found in an old road bed that is oriented north-south. This road is still in use. There is also a reported cemetery at the site, but there was no surface indication and the names and dates of individuals interred is unknown. The site has been heavily impacted by bulldozing, and appears to have been...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0451. Site 3PU0451 a historic residence, probably dating late in the historic period. The site has been highly impacted by bulldozing, evidenced by mixed soils and several spoil piles. The structures have been totally destroyed and are partially found in the rubble piles. The site area was clear cut at one time. The site only has an estimated 2% integrity, consisting of a buried, concrete sewage box. In view of the limited degree of remaining contextual integrity and the late...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Rolando L. Garza.

Site form for 3PU0452. Site 3PU0452 appears to be a historic residence dating to the late 1940s or 1950s and may be a part of the community of Toneyville. The site was probably 90% clear cut at one time and has been heavily bulldozed. The only remaining evidence of a structure at the site are a set of two concrete steps {each with two tiers) and a scatter of dressed sandstone slabs with some evidence of mortar or cement. Due to the limited integrity and late date of occupation, the site is...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Gary L. Shaw. Steven Hunt.

Site Form for 3PU0456. Site 3PU0456 consists of the remaining portions of the Arkansas Ordnance Plant (AOP) which are found within the Little Rock Air Force Base. The AOP was a government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) facility that was constructed during 1941-1942 and which was closed in 1945. After the plant was closed, the buildings were stripped of equipment and the majority were either demolished or moved. Site 3PU0456 consists of about 20 percent of the original AOP. Almost all of these...

DOCUMENT Full-Text James Popham. John H. House.

Site form for 3PU0778. Site 3PU0778 consists of a single dart point, made of yellowish brown gravel chert. The chert point was found on a patch of bare soil approximately 15m on a side, immediately north of a paved road. The artifact is currently in the care of James Popham pending arrangements for permanent curation.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Chris Branam.

Site form for 3PU1035. Site 3PU1035 is a historic site consisting of small concrete foundation remains measuring 1.5 x 1 meter. No other features or artifacts were observed during delineation at the site.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Chris Branam.

Site form for 3PU1036. Site 3PU1036 dates to the 20th Century and consists of small, scattered concrete foundation remains covering an area of roughly 10 x 8 meters. No other features or artifacts were observed during delineation at the site. No structures were observed in this vicinity on the 1941, 1954, or 1975 Quadrangle Maps.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Chris Branam.

Site form for 3PU1037. 3PU1037 is a historic site, consisting of small, scattered concrete and rock foundation remains covering roughly 5 x 1 meters. No other features or artifacts were observed during delineation at the site. No structures were observed in this vicinity on the 1941, 1954, or 1975 Quadrangle Maps.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steven Brann. Alexis Smith.

Site form for 3PU1041. Site 3PU1041 consists of a surface scatter of historic artifacts in an area approximately 24.3 meters (80 feet) by 16. 7 meters (55 feet). All artifacts were fragmentary and none contained makers marks or strongly diagnostic morphologies. No evidence of historic features was observed at the site. The area has been heavily impacted by construction grading and very little soil was apparent at the surface. This historic artifact scatter site is recommended not eligible for...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Steven Brann. Alexis Smith.

Site form for 3PU1074. Site 3PU1074 consists of a surface scatter of historic artifacts on a hilltop, covering an area approximately 70 meters (230 feet) by 45 meters (148 feet). All artifacts were fragmentary and none contained makers marks or strongly diagnostic morphologies. No evidence of historic features was observed at the site. The area has been heavily impacted by construction grading and very little soil was apparent at the surface. This historic artifact scatter site is recommended...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Wilfred Husted.

Site form for 3PU294. Site 3PU294 is an Isolated Find consisting of a single Prehistoric projectile point fragment discovered on an eroded dirt road. A careful search of the road revealed no other archaeological material. No further study is recommended.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Table of proposed demolition projects at Little Rock Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Mark Christ. David Stumpf.

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Registration form for the Titan II ICBM Launch Complex 373-5 Site.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Mark Christ. David Stumpf.

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Registration form for the Titan II ICBM Launch Complex 374-5 Site.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Mark Christ. David Stumpf.

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Registration form for the Titan II ICBM Launch Complex 374-7 site.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Tribal correspondence letter describing proposed action and alternatives for an environmental assessment of installation development at Little Rock Air Force Base.