Archaeomagnetic Dates and the Hohokam Phase Sequence

Author(s): Jeffrey Eighmy; Randall H. McGuire

Year: 1988

Summary

Few things in Southwestern archaeology are so widely and hotly contested as the Hohokam phase sequence and chronology. Presently, no fewer than 12 different Hohokam chronologies exist and more appear to be under production. Disputes concerning the Hohokam chronology involve not only the dating of phases but also, even more basically, challenges to the integrity of the phase definitions. In the last decade, controversy has focused on three aspects of the chronology; (1) the validity and ordering of phases, (2) the argument that phases defined by pottery types overlap in time, and (3) the calibration of the phase sequence. In addition to these frequently addressed issues sufficient data presently exists to investigate the contemporaneity of phases across the Hohokam range.

The over 695 archaeomagnetic samples collected from Hohokam sites in the last decade provide a data base for evaluating most of the issues surrounding the Hohokam chronology. While a major objective of archaeological efforts in southern Arizona has been to firm up the Hohokam chronology, this problem has not been addressed effectively in the context of site specific or project specific analyses of archaeomagnetic dates. On a specific site or in a specific project the number of samples has been small, and often the samples relate to only a restricted time period within Hohokam prehistory. Further, concern remains that dates derived from a curve at least partially calibrated with Hohokam dates might be in error. When gathered together as a whole the nearly 700 samples taken in southern Arizona provide an impressive empirical base for addressing chronological concerns.

This report and the analysis on which it is based are the result of support provided by the Arizona Projects Office, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

Cite this Record

Archaeomagnetic Dates and the Hohokam Phase Sequence. Jeffrey Eighmy, Randall H. McGuire. 1988 ( tDAR id: 57029) ; doi:10.6067/XCV8BV7JHM

This Resource is Part of the Following Collections

Keywords

Culture
Hohokam

Material
Ceramic • Clay • Dating Sample

Site Name
AZ AA:1:62 (ASM) • AZ AA:1:66 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:149 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:2 (ASU) • AZ AA:12:384 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:409 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:46 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:484 (ASM) • AZ AA:12:57 (ASM) • AZ AA:16:44 (ASM) • AZ AA:16:94 (ASM) • AZ BB:13:14 (ASM) • AZ BB:13:15 (ASM) • AZ BB:13:225 (ASM) • AZ BB:13:68 (ASM) • AZ BB:13:74 (ASM) • AZ BB:2:20 (ASM) • AZ BB:2:22 (ASM) • AZ BB:9:101 (ASM) • AZ BB:9:129 (ASM) • AZ BB:9:14 (ASM) • AZ BB:9:143 (ASM) • AZ EE:1:152 (ASM) • AZ EE:1:155 (ASM) • AZ EE:1:158 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:105 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:106 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:109 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:116 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:129 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:76 (ASM) • AZ EE:2:77 (ASM) • AZ T:12:10 (ASM) • AZ T:12:37 (ASM) • AZ T:12:42 (ASM) • AZ T:12:43 (ASM) • AZ T:12:48 (ASM) • AZ T:16:16 (ASM) • AZ T:16:20 (ASM) • AZ T:16:55 (ASM) • AZ T:16:71 (ASM) • AZ T:16:83 (ASM) • AZ T:16:86 (ASM) • AZ T:4:12 (ASM) • AZ T:4:16 (ASM) • AZ T:8:16 (ASM) • AZ T:8:17 (ASM) • AZ T:8:38 (ASM) • AZ U:1:14 (PGM) • AZ U:10:6 (ASM) • AZ U:13:24 (ASM) • AZ U:15:109 (ASM) • AZ U:15:19 (ASM) • AZ U:15:48 (ASM) • AZ U:15:59 (ASM) • AZ U:15:61 (ASM) • AZ U:15:62 (ASM) • AZ U:15:77 (ASM) • AZ U:15:83 (ASM) • AZ U:15:87 (ASM) • AZ U:9:38 (ASM) • AZ U:9:66 (ASM) • NA18003 • NA18017 • NA18030 • NA18031 • NA19324 Show More

Investigation Types
Methodology, Theory, or Synthesis

General
Archaeomagnetism • Central Arizona Project • Chronology • Dating

Geographic Keywords
04999 (Fips Code) • All Counties (County) • Arizona (State / Territory) • North America (Continent) • Phoenix Basin • Tucson Basin • United States of America (Country)

Temporal Keywords
Civano Phase • Classic Period • El Polvoron Phase • Estrella Phase • Gila Butte Phase • Historic • Protohistoric • Rillito Phase • Rincon Phase • Sacaton Phase • Santa Cruz Phase • Snaketown Phase • Soho Phase • Sweetwater Phase • Tanque Verde Phase • Tucson Phase

Spatial Coverage

min long: -112.813; min lat: 31.391 ; max long: -110.479; max lat: 34.395 ;

Individual & Institutional Roles

Contact(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office

Contributor(s): Brantly Jackson; Ronaldo Gould; Doug Mitchell; Bob Gasser; Cory Breternitz; Jerry Howard; John Cable; Dave Doyle; Richard Martinec; Richard Ciiolek-Torrello; Glen Rice; Jon S. Czaplicki; John Ravesloot; John H. Madsen; Susan Brew; Bruce B. Huckell; Bruce Massey; Lynne Teague; Bill Doelle; Mike Bartlett; Dave Gregory

Sponsor(s): U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Arizona Projects Office

Repository(s): Salt River Project

Prepared By(s): Colorado State University

Record Identifiers

NADB Citation ID No.(s): 000000166858

NADB Document ID No.(s): 2202754

Notes

General Note: The physical copy of this report for which the original NADB citation was created was sent from Colorado State University, and can be found at Bureau of Reclamation, Box 25007, Denver CO 80255.

File Information

  Name Size Creation Date Date Uploaded Access
CCRS-1988-003-Archaeomagnetic-Dates-and-the-Hohokam-Phase-Sequ... 13.69mb Mar 11, 2016 4:09:10 PM Confidential
This file is unredacted.

Accessing Restricted Files

At least one of the files for this resource is restricted from public view. For more information regarding access to these files, please reference the contact information below

Contact(s): USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office

This Resource is Part of the Following User Created Collections