Cultural Resources Assessment of 117 Archaeological Sites for the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts, Central Arizona Project Canal: Photo Log

Summary

In compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Phoenix Area Office (PXAO) began cultural resource surveys along the Central Arizona Project (CAP) main stem alignment shortly after the CAP was authorized. For the next 25 years, various cultural resource management contractors conducted inventories of the CAP, recording several hundred archaeological sites. From the 1970s to the 1980s, some of these sites were tested and/or excavated as mitigation for the construction of the CAP main stem canal. While many sites were determined eligible or not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (Register), some did not receive eligibility determinations and some were located outside of the construction corridor and not affected by construction activities. The legacy survey data and site records from these various investigations have a number of errors and are sometimes contradictory.

In an effort to better manage cultural resources on Reclamation land, PXAO has developed an archaeological site database for the CAP canal. The database was developed using all the previous main stem survey data; however, the Register eligibility status of the majority of these sites was unknown following completion of the CAP. Additionally, an unknown number of sites were either destroyed by construction or excavation, while others are no longer within Reclamation’s CAP ROW. It is necessary that the database accurately reflects the current Register eligibility status of all archaeological sites within the CAP ROW to ensure that PXAO can effectively manage these sites. To this end, PXAO has been updating its database and conducted consultation with the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in 2015, seeking to resolve the eligibility status of sites within the CAP ROW. Following this consultation, the SHPO and PXAO agreed that based on the assessment data provided, further work was required on 117 sites along the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts. For 24 sites determined eligible for the Register, the maps from the original surveys were insufficient. For another 93 sites, the data provided was insufficient to determine whether a site was eligible or ineligible for inclusion in the Register.

During ACS’ efforts to relocate 117 previously recorded sites along the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts, eligibility for 10 sites could not be determined and so eligibility testing was conducted at these 10 sites to determine Register eligibility or the extent to which subsurface deposits are likely present with the CAP ROW.

Following this work, additional survey was conducted in selected portions of the CAP corridor to try and relocate 15 sites that could not be found due to destruction or misplotting.

This file is the log of photographs taken during this project.

Cite this Record

Cultural Resources Assessment of 117 Archaeological Sites for the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts, Central Arizona Project Canal: Photo Log. Walter R. Punzmann, Jennifer Rich, Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd.. 2017 ( tDAR id: 440011) ; doi:10.6067/XCV8R21450

Keywords

Culture
Archaic Early Archaic Euroamerican Historic Historic Native American Hohokam Late Archaic Middle Archaic PaleoIndian

Material
Building Materials Ceramic Chipped Stone Fire Cracked Rock Glass Ground Stone Metal Shell Wood

Site Name
AZ AA:11:26(ASM) AZ AA:11:29(ASM) AZ AA:12:1163(ASM) AZ AA:12:125(ASM) AZ AA:12:209(ASM) AZ AA:12:325(ASM) AZ AA:12:329(ASM) AZ AA:12:353(ASM) AZ AA:12:354(ASM) AZ AA:12:355(ASM) AZ AA:12:357(ASM) AZ AA:12:368(ASM) AZ AA:12:384(ASM) AZ AA:12:452(ASM) AZ AA:12:453(ASM) AZ AA:12:457(ASM) AZ AA:12:458(ASM) AZ AA:12:463(ASM) AZ AA:12:464(ASM) AZ AA:12:483(ASM) AZ AA:12:484(ASM) AZ AA:12:485(ASM) AZ AA:12:520(ASM) AZ AA:12:579(ASM) AZ AA:12:624(ASM) AZ AA:12:644(ASM) AZ AA:12:645(ASM) AZ AA:16:158(ASM) AZ AA:16:174(ASM) AZ AA:16:304(ASM) AZ AA:16:307(ASM) AZ AA:3:10(MNA) AZ AA:3:18(ASM) AZ AA:3:19(ASM) AZ AA:3:2(MNA) AZ AA:3:21(ASM) AZ AA:3:23(ASM) AZ AA:3:24(ASM) AZ AA:3:26(ASM) AZ AA:3:3(MNA) AZ AA:3:326(ASM) AZ AA:3:327(ASM) AZ AA:3:328(ASM) AZ AA:3:329(ASM) AZ AA:3:330(ASM) AZ AA:3:331(ASM) AZ AA:3:332(ASM) AZ AA:3:339(ASM) AZ AA:3:340(ASM) AZ AA:3:37(ASM) AZ AA:3:4(MNA) AZ AA:3:47(ASM) AZ AA:3:49(ASM) AZ AA:3:50(ASM) AZ AA:3:53(ASM) AZ AA:3:54(ASM) AZ AA:3:55(ASM) AZ AA:3:56(ASM) AZ AA:3:58(ASM) AZ AA:3:59(ASM) AZ AA:3:62(ASM) AZ AA:3:63(ASM) AZ AA:3:9(ASM) AZ AA:6:352(ASM) AZ AA:7:15(ASM) AZ AA:7:27(ASM) AZ AA:7:46(ASM) AZ AA:7:47(ASM) AZ AA:7:48(ASM) AZ AA:7:53(ASM) AZ AA:7:57(ASM) AZ AA:7:59(ASM) AZ AA:7:62(ASM) AZ AA:7:64(ASM) AZ AA:7:66(ASM) AZ AA:7:68(ASM) AZ AA:7:70(ASM) AZ AA:7:85(ASM) AZ AA:7:87(ASM) AZ U:10:10(MNA) AZ U:10:11(MNA) AZ U:10:12(MNA) AZ U:10:13(ASM) AZ U:10:13(MNA) AZ U:10:14(ASM) AZ U:10:17(ASM) AZ U:10:19(ASM) AZ U:10:2(MNA) AZ U:10:3(ASM) AZ U:10:4(MNA) AZ U:10:5(ASM) AZ U:10:5(MNA) AZ U:10:51(ASU) AZ U:10:6(ASM) AZ U:10:6(MNA) AZ U:10:7(ASM) AZ U:14:2(MNA) AZ U:14:30(ASU) AZ U:14:31(ASU) AZ U:14:46(ASM) AZ U:14:73(ASM) AZ U:15:10(ASM) AZ U:15:10(ASU) AZ U:15:10(MNA) AZ U:15:100(ASM) AZ U:15:102(ASM) AZ U:15:104(ASM) AZ U:15:12(ASU) AZ U:15:13(ASM) AZ U:15:13(MNA) AZ U:15:15(ASM) AZ U:15:19(ASM) AZ U:15:19(MNA) AZ U:15:2(MNA) AZ U:15:20(MNA) AZ U:15:21(MNA) AZ U:15:22(MNA) AZ U:15:23(MNA) AZ U:15:24(MNA) AZ U:15:26(MNA) AZ U:15:27(MNA) AZ U:15:28(ASU) AZ U:15:28(MNA) AZ U:15:29(ASU) AZ U:15:29(MNA) AZ U:15:3(ASU) AZ U:15:3(MNA) AZ U:15:30(ASU) AZ U:15:30(MNA) AZ U:15:32(MNA) AZ U:15:33(MNA) AZ U:15:38(MNA) AZ U:15:39(MNA) AZ U:15:4(MNA) AZ U:15:40(MNA) AZ U:15:41(MNA) AZ U:15:43(MNA) AZ U:15:46(ASM) AZ U:15:48(ASM) AZ U:15:5(MNA) AZ U:15:57(ASM) AZ U:15:59(ASM) AZ U:15:6(MNA) AZ U:15:61(ASM) AZ U:15:62(ASM) AZ U:15:63(ASM) AZ U:15:64(ASM) AZ U:15:65(ASM) AZ U:15:66(ASM) AZ U:15:665(ASM) AZ U:15:69(ASM) AZ U:15:7(ASU) AZ U:15:71(ASM) AZ U:15:73(ASM) AZ U:15:74(ASM) AZ U:15:75(ASM) AZ U:15:76(ASM) AZ U:15:77(ASM) AZ U:15:81(ASM) AZ U:15:83(ASM) AZ U:15:834(ASM) AZ U:15:84(ASM) AZ U:15:845(ASM) AZ U:15:85(ASM) AZ U:15:87(ASM) AZ U:15:872(ASM) AZ U:15:873(ASM) AZ U:15:875(ASM) AZ U:15:876(ASM) AZ U:15:97(ASM) AZ U:15:99(ASM) AZ U:6:2(ASU) NA15261 NA15611 NA15613 NA15614 NA15615 NA15619 NA15620 NA15622 NA15627 NA15628 NA15629 NA15630 NA15631 NA15632 NA15636 NA15647 NA15648 NA15649 NA15653 NA15654 NA15655 NA15656 NA15657 NA15660 NA15663 NA15664 NA15665 NA15666 NA15667 NA15668 NA15669 NA15756 NA15772 NA15775 NA16646 NA18004 NA18005 NA18008 NA18009 NA18010 NA18011 NA18012 NA18013 NA18014 NA18020 NA18022 NA18024 NA18031 NA18037 NA18039 NA18056 NA18268 The Florence to Picacho Road Show More

Site Type
Agricultural or Herding Ancient Structure Archaeological Feature Artifact Scatter Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex Encampment Hamlet / Village Hearth Petroglyph Pit Quarry Resource Extraction / Production / Transportation Structure or Features Road Road, Trail, and Related Structures or Features Roasting Pit / Oven / Horno Rock Alignment Rock Art Settlements Structure Water Control Feature

Temporal Coverage

Calendar Date: 1800 to 1900 (Historic/EuroAmerican)

Calendar Date: -12000 to 1500 (Prehistoric/Native Archaeological Culture)

Spatial Coverage

min long: -112.143; min lat: 31.747 ; max long: -110.814; max lat: 33.715 ;

Record Identifiers

ACS Project No.(s): 16-145:CSUR/TEST

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Delivery Order No.(s): R16PS00682

GSA Contract No.(s): GS10F0224P

ASM Accession No.(s): 2017-384.ASM; 2012-541.ASM

File Information

  Name Size Creation Date Date Uploaded Access
Photo-Log.pdf 53.20kb Dec 21, 2017 Dec 21, 2017 11:02:34 AM Public
In compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Phoenix Area Office (PXAO) began cultural resource surveys along the Central Arizona Project (CAP) main stem alignment shortly after the CAP was authorized. For the next 25 years, various cultural resource management contractors conducted inventories of the CAP, recording several hundred archaeological sites. From the 1970s to the 1980s, some of these sites were tested and/or excavated as mitigation for the construction of the CAP main stem canal. While many sites were determined eligible or not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (Register), some did not receive eligibility determinations and some were located outside of the construction corridor and not affected by construction activities. The legacy survey data and site records from these various investigations have a number of errors and are sometimes contradictory. In an effort to better manage cultural resources on Reclamation land, PXAO has developed an archaeological site database for the CAP canal. The database was developed using all the previous main stem survey data; however, the Register eligibility status of the majority of these sites was unknown following completion of the CAP. Additionally, an unknown number of sites were either destroyed by construction or excavation, while others are no longer within Reclamation’s CAP ROW. It is necessary that the database accurately reflects the current Register eligibility status of all archaeological sites within the CAP ROW to ensure that PXAO can effectively manage these sites. To this end, PXAO has been updating its database and conducted consultation with the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in 2015, seeking to resolve the eligibility status of sites within the CAP ROW. Following this consultation, the SHPO and PXAO agreed that based on the assessment data provided, further work was required on 117 sites along the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts. For 24 sites determined eligible for the Register, the maps from the original surveys were insufficient. For another 93 sites, the data provided was insufficient to determine whether a site was eligible or ineligible for inclusion in the Register. During ACS’ efforts to relocate 117 previously recorded sites along the Fannin-McFarland and Tucson Aqueducts, eligibility for 10 sites could not be determined and so eligibility testing was conducted at these 10 sites to determine Register eligibility or the extent to which subsurface deposits are likely present with the CAP ROW. Following this work, additional survey was conducted in selected portions of the CAP corridor to try and relocate 15 sites that could not be found due to destruction or misplotting. This file is the log of photographs taken during this project.

This Resource is Part of the Following User Created Collections