Randolph Air Force Base Archaeology Archive

DOCUMENT Full-Text Leonard A. Patrick.

Randolph Air Force Base created a project to construct a handicap ramp on the secondary elevation of Building 901. The proposed ramp meets ADA requirements. It has been determined that there would be "no adverse effect" on the property or the historic district. Copied to the correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This letter of correspondence was written by Neil K. Kanno of Randolph Air Force Base to F. Lawrence Oaks of the State Historical Preservation Office regarding proposed modifications to Building 100.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

Building 100, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, receives many visitors yearly. Therefore, it was mandatory that Randolph Air Force Base develop an undertaking concerning installation of handrails at public buildings. Randolph Air Force Base has determined that the proposed project will have “no adverse effect” on the property and has provided in this letter summary documentation for review.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This Section 106 coordination memo describes the installation of external handrails on Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas. Section 106 coordination with the Texas SHPO is attached. It has been determined that this undertaking will have "no adverse effect" on the property and this letter provides summary documentation for review.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This memo concerns the installation of quarry tile on the steps of Building 100. Building 100 is in the Randolph Field Historic District, and it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect" and this letter provides summary documentation for review and comments. Copied to this correspondence is the Texas State Historic Preservation Office.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Patrick Atkinson.

Correspondence discussing solutions and plans for the renovation of Building 901 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Phillip L. Smith.

Fort Sam Houston is planning an undertaking to demolish building 197 which was constructed in 1912 as a troop barracks. The building is currently being utilized as an administration facility housing the Army Band. This property is listed as a Category I historic property in the Programmatic Agreement and is a contributing element to the National Historic Landmark District. Fort Sam Houston has determined that this undertaking is an adverse effect and that the area of potential effect will be the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Phillip L. Smith.

The U.S. Army and Fort Sam Houston have been directed by Congress to reduce the quantity of buildings on inventory. This reduction and the attendant demolition may have an adverse effect on some installation properties that have been determined potentially eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. In accordance with the Programmatic Agreement, the Directorate of Public Works, Fort Sam Houston, writes to invite the signatories to participate in consultation and to...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Circle and Duplex homes at Randolph Air Force Base. After reviewing the scope of work and the discussion of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or on the landmark district. The project to install external AC unites may continue if the stipulations in this letter are met.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memo advises the ACHP that, because Randolph Air Force Base has not received any comments in the 30 day time-frame, Randolph assumes a concurred determination of no adverse effect and will proceed with the project. The proposed undertaking involves construction of parking lots in the Duplex Housing area.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses a proposed undertaking at Hangar 12, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Attached are the undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses a proposed undertaking at Hangar 12, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Attached are the undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides additional documentation for the proposed rehabilitation and restoration of Building 900, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides additional documentation for the proposed rehabilitation and restoration of Building 900, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the proposed construction of an awning on the secondary elevation of building 671. It was determined that an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties, but will not alter the building's original design.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for two proposed additions to Building 500, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for construction of a 2,800 square foot warehouse in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. A determination of "no adverse effect" is based on the principle that new construction in historic districts is often necessary. The proposed new structure will be differentiated from the old, and it shall be compatible with the massing size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of its environment. Copied to this...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This letter provides documentation, including a memorandum, for the proposed replacement of copper gutters and down spouts on housing units listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph Air Force Base has determined that the undertaking will alter the exterior design of the structures but not in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the properties and their historic affiliations. Copied to this...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed replacement of the exterior wooden doors on Building 671, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This building was constructed in 1931 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed restoration of Building 499 that is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed temporary curb cuts at Cadet Circle located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. It was determined that an undertaking exists, and will temporarily alter the design of the area. Attached to this memorandum is the undertaking and assessment report.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for window replacement in the Randolph Family Duplex Units. Originally constructed in the 1930’s, all family units contained steel casement windows. The casement windows were replaced circa 1983 with one-over-one sash aluminum windows.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ritch Woods.

Correspondence concerning the store front doors at Building 905 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ritch Woods.

This correspondence addresses the concern and needed procedure for replacing the original doors for Buildings 110 and 120 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Robin D. Divine.

SAIC has been contracted by the United States Army Corp of Engineers, the Fort Worth District to develop an environmental assessment for the US Army at Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas. The US Army is proposing to demolish six vacant and deteriorating buildings on Fort Sam Houston and two on Camp Bullis. All of the buildings identified for demolition are located in developed areas of the posts and total approximately 12,800 square feet. The demolition activities would occur in the 2004...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Russell J. Powers.

Summary, background and staff views on the improvements proposed and accomplished on Buildings 902, 675, 661, and 216 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on siting of the proposed FMO Warehouse by applying Federal criteria and the procedures of Civil Engineer Division Instruction 32-1. It was determined the site is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District and that the action will have no adverse effect on the landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted of the proposed installation of new communications lines and upgrading the existing communication lines within Randolph AFB. By applying Federal criteria and the procedures of the current Programmatic Agreement between the TXSHPO and the JBSA, it was determined the sites are located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the current scope of work and our discussions of the proposed project, it was determined the action will have No...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This short correspondence offers ideas for adding awnings to the flight side of Hangar 71 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This is continued correspondence between Randolph Air Force Base and the State Historic Preservation Office concerning the difference in opinion on the proposed construction of parking lots in the Duplex Housing Area at Randolph.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) staff determined that the proposed construction of parking lots in the Duplex Housing at Randolph Air Force Base would be an "adverse effect" and a Memorandum of Agreement would be required. Because of the difference of opinion on this determination between Randolph Air Force Base and SHPO, Randolph has decided to exercise their option to go directly to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Denver) for a second opinion.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking that may effect Building 661 which is known to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Randolph Air Force Base has determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the property and provides in this letter summary documentation for the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base completed the Section 106 coordination process with the Texas State Historical Preservation Officer as required by the National Historic Preservation Act. This letter details the change in substitute door material to me used for the replacement of the external doors of Building 671 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III. Joseph M. Logan.

Randolph Ai Force Base will begin an undertaking that involves the rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of a temporary WWII mobilization building (Building 156). An installation map and inventory form are included in this document along with the project overview.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking that may effect Building 661 which is known to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. After an internal review, Randolph determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the property. This letter provides the summary documentation from that review.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This correspondence is accompanied by photographs of a red fence constructed to block AC units from view and discusses how the fence obscures the character defining features of the historic building.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This correspondence is to confirm the decisions made and the specs for the window replacement project for Building 241 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

There was a proposed project of installing new entrance openings and windows in the annexes of Hangar 5 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project is approved as No Adverse Effect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A review was conducted on Building 100 by Randolph Air Force Base that determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work proposed, it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on its surrounding landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Correspondence in planning to have Tom Clark visit Randolph Air Force base and survey the historic windows at Building 901 and Building 399.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed rehabilitation of Hangar 6, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Placesand located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. It was determined that an undertaking does exist; however, not in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property and provide cause for its removal from the National Register of Historic Places.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 237. The undertaking is limited to the relocation of interior office walls. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect." Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter states the difficulties and adverse effects that canopies have when introduced to historic buildings. Randolph Air Force Base has concluded that the proposed canopy for Building 399 would be distracting and recommends disapproval of the project.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Letter detailing correspondence between Scott Shepherd and Stan Graves concerning the replacement of rain gutters and supporting equipment.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Correspondence discussing the maintenance and installation of copper down spots, flashing and gutters at the O' Club, Building 500, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Correspondence concerning recent meeting with the State Historic Preservation Office regarding Building 902 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Discussed at the meeting was the approval of a design for the building.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted a review on Building 661. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on the structure or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

An un-authored letter on the cost bid for window replacement/refurbishment for Building 901-675 A at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memo was written by Scott Shepherd to document verbal correspondence between him, Lt Col Wiemer, and Col Danos concerning Building 118 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

This document contains notes related to the maintenance and upkeep of Chapel 1, Building 102, Randolph Air Force Base. Also included is a list of a sample order of future project scheduling.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

Handwritten memo recording points of contact and conversations focusing on Building 900 and its Events Room, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This Section 106 coordination memo describes the installation of external handrails on Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas. Section 106 coordination with the Texas SHPO is also included.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

The purpose of this memo is to provide information for Section 106 review of an undertaking to rehabilitate the restrooms on the first floor of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. Randolph proposes an undertaking that will convert one of the men's restrooms to a women's restroom and convert the existing women's restroom to a unisex/ADA restroom. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society and Jack Siegel (HQ AETC/CEPN).

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A meeting was held at the Texas Historical Commission to discuss window replacement and other historical matters of concern. Part of the discussion involved Section 106 not being completed on Buildings 902, 216 and 675 "B Wing" prior to the project start.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The purpose of this memo is to provide LTC Kanno with background information on the Handrail project and the proposed project to install quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The purpose of this memo is for Randolph Air Force Base to provide LTC Kanno with a package, per his request, that can be presented to the SPTG/CC on handrail installation for entrances to Building 100.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter gives an update on the information and plans for sitting the subject carports. The correspondence also lists requirements completed.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memo details the background, discussion, and recommendations for the proposed project of a four-foot chain link fence at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included are three detailed plans of the installation.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter provides background, description of the current situation, and recommendations for a project to install fencecrete at select sites at Randolph Air Force Base. This correspondence also indicates that there was a determination of no adverse effect for the proposed undertaking.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter gives an update on the information and plans for sitting the subject carports. The correspondence also lists requirements completed.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memo concerns the involvement of Sharon Fleming, the project reviewer, in the installation of each fence in the historic housing neighborhoods in Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building specifically addressed in Building 418.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination concerning the memorandum on a proposed project for Hangar 62 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination on the memorandum providing the State Historic Preservation Office with project information and it requests comments on the proposed design of a canopy at the southwest corner of Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Additionally, a double door will be cut into the hangar wall between the pillars.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO indicates our intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. In the original Section 106 letter to the SHPO in 1992 we indicated that we would use the original tiles if at all possible. In 1993, US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The sentence in the first Section 106 letter to the SHPO we sent to your office and was changed so...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO spells out the intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The determination was No Adverse Effect; therefore, additional coordination with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

In reference to the management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, this root cause analysis states that personnel were working under the impression that coordination was only required if the proposed project had a possible adverse effect on traditional religious or was of cultural importance. They overlooked the requirement to, “…meet periodically with each Indian Tribe”.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum gives a root cause analysis that the original Cultural Resources Management Plan was published in November 1996 and subsequently updated and replaced by the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) in July 2003. As required by AFI32-7065, 1 Jun 2004, paragraph 1.4.7.4, the ICRMP will be reviewed every five years; this action was completed 30 Oct 2008. Personnel were aware of the outdated mission statement; however, elected to wait final transformation and a Wing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

A management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, from south central Texas, emphasizing the desire to maintain an information conduit. The memorandum will explain that Randolph completed an archeological survey with negative findings of Native American traditional religious or of cultural importance. The memorandum will recognize the unique government-to-government relationship that exists between the federal government and tribes; it will be...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Memorandum from Cultural Resources Manager sent to Hunt Building Company regarding the involvement of Building 300 in a proposed Randolph Family Housing Scope of Work. It was determined Building 300 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the proposed Scope of Work and our discussion of the project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property or on the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Bruce R. Nadler.

This memorandum concerns the proposed construction of a canopy and the cutting of a double doorway on the secondary elevation of Hangar 63. Hanger 63 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The Base Civil Engineer determined an undertaking does exist with potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text G. Kenneth Grim.

A memorandum for disbursement sent from Tetra Tech Inc. to Fort Worth District, Norfolk District, Mobile District, Fort Sam Houston, and the RCI Office. This memorandum transmits the final Environmental Baseline Survey for Residential Communities Initiative Properties at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harry F. Finke.

The following guidance are now policy to clarify current painting color schemes on the exterior of Randolph facilities. The current policy for painting facilities revolves around architecture compatibility. Randolph AFB basically employs a tri-color exterior scheme consisting of FED-STD 595 (Rev A) colors only. Approved schemes reflect changes in policy effective with this letter. Deviations from this policy require Wing Commander approval.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harvey Browder.

This memorandum addresses an amendment that was issued to add historical compliance requirements for the Hangar 6 entrance door at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Leon D. Spradling.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed construction of an internal elevator and upgrade of the external access ramp at Building 100. Repair and Renovation of the antiquated electrical, electronic, security, water and sewer systems will be modernized. All steel casement windows will be repaired. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This memorandum concerns the installation of quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. After careful and in-depth consideration of this undertaking, Randolph determined there would be an effect. However, the effect would not result in the removal of the building from the Register or significantly distract from its character-defining features. As a result, the determination is No Adverse Effect. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the proposed construction of a handicapped ramp on the secondary elevation of Building 671, located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect" for the undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the functional use of Hangar 70. Hangar 70 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Constructed in 1931 to store and repair aircraft, it was converted to a gymnasium circa 1942. In 2007, a new gymnasium (Fitness Center) was completed. This action will allow Hangar 70 is to be renovated and returned to function as an aircraft hangar.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed interior rehabilitation and restoration of Building 100, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined that the undertaking is "No Adverse Effect" and has provided in this letter summery documentation for review. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses an undertaking at Hangar 64, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Included is an undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A review was conducted on Hangar 70 by applying procedures contained in the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR part 800 (Section 106), and the guidelines of Division Instruction 32-1 as they pertain to the effects of rehabilitation treatment measures criteria. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located within the Randolph Field Historic District. It was also determined that the proposed scope of work would have an adverse effect on the historic property or its district - this letter explains this decision.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on the Temporary Lodging Facilities and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project to replace front and rear external doors, it as determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 901 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work and past, related discussions it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 901 and determined the property was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the proposed design for the building, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 671 and it was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing Work Request 8400, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property and its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Buildings 907 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The proposal to construct a wall and insulate the doors between Rooms 211 and 212 would be determined to be an Adverse Effect and would violate the terms of the MOA. Randolph Air Force Base recommends the proposal be disapproved.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 671 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property and its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an Evaluation on Building 900, and after reviewing the scope of work and previous discussions of the project, it was determined that the proposed action will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on the proposal to construct a Fire Equipment Building in front of Building 902. After reviewing the scope of work and past discussions of the project, it was determined that the proposed action will have no adverse effect on the historic building or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Building 975, the Airmen Ministry Center, at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that this property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places; however, it is in the Area of Potential Effect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 102 concerning external wall repair. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or its district. Copied to this correspondence is Father Richard Novotny.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Hangars 40 and 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined this property is eligible for listing on the National Resgister of Historic Places. After reviewing the proposed project, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 667. It was determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places and after reviewing the scope of work and associated discussions of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse affect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 100's Dome Doors. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that external renovation of the doors will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property and its landmark district. This letter details the conditions Randolph has put in place in order for this determination to be met.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation of Building 100. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that external renovation of the Theater at Building 100 will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or its district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 100. After reviewing the scope of work and our discussion of the proposed project, it was determined the proposed action to suspend the acoustical ceilings will have an "adverse effect" on the historic property and the landmark district. The proposal is disapproved.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force bAse conducted and evaluation on Building 861 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work and past discussions, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the landmark district in which the property is located.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Hangar 40 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. After reviewing the proposed project to renovate the hangar's infrastructure, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 200. After reviewing the scope of work for the courtyard renovation, it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district. This letter also includes conditions needed to be met in order for the undertaking to move forward.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 235 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and that the proposed internal renovation would have no adverse effect.