Joint Base San Antonio Archaeology and Cultural Resources Archive
Part of: Air Force - West
Collection of documents, data, and images generated from and/or related to archaeological resource and investigations managed by the Joint Base San Antonio Air Force Base in Texas. The collection was created by tDAR under contract with the USAF and is intended to organize documents, images, and other data from Lackland Air Force Base. Some of the digital resources are organized under projects, which group together documents, etc. from particular investigations or related to certain sites or parts of the base. Other digital objects are included individually. Due to the potential sensitive information included in these documents, users that wish to access documents and images without redaction should contact the cultural resources office at Joint Base San Antonio Air Force Base.
Site Name Keywords
41BX1065 •
41BX1447 •
41BX1104 •
41BX1107 •
41BX1069 •
41BX1092 •
41BX1093 •
41BX1082 •
41BX1061 •
41BX377
Site Type Keywords
Non-Domestic Structures •
Governmental Structure •
Historic Governmental Structure •
Military Structure •
Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex •
Domestic Structures •
Archaeological Feature •
Artifact Scatter •
House •
Communal / Public Structure
Other Keywords
Map •
OAHP •
Camp Bullis Survey •
NRHP •
National Register of Historic Places •
Building 100 •
Taj Mahal •
Building 902 •
Building 661 •
Infantry Post
Culture Keywords
Historic •
Prehistoric •
Archaic •
Late Archaic •
Early Archaic •
Middle Archaic •
Euroamerican •
PaleoIndian •
Late Prehistoric •
Spanish
Investigation Types
Heritage Management •
Architectural Documentation •
Architectural Survey •
Reconnaissance / Survey •
Historic Background Research •
Methodology, Theory, or Synthesis •
Site Evaluation / Testing •
Research Design / Data Recovery Plan •
Archaeological Overview •
Site Stabilization
Material Types
Chipped Stone •
Fire Cracked Rock •
Glass •
Metal •
Building Materials •
Ceramic •
Ground Stone •
Fauna •
Shell •
Human Remains
Temporal Keywords
WWII •
Historic •
World War II •
WWI •
Cold War Era •
20th Century •
1930s •
1940s •
1950s •
Korean War
Geographic Keywords
North America (Continent) •
United States of America (Country) •
USA (Country) •
Texas (State / Territory) •
Bexar County (County) •
Texas •
San Antonio •
Bexar (County) •
Randolph Air Force Base •
JBSA-Sam Houston
Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 1,701-1,800 of 2,414)
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, MOA on Demolition of Building 1030, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's request for a signature of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow the demolition of Building 1030. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission is specifically writing to halt the demolition of Building 1030 since the MOA originally allowing the undertaking was signed in error.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Building 1030 HABS Documentation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the undertaking for Building 1030. The Commission has reviewed the documentation provided an agrees that it fulfills Fort Sam Houston's obligation to provide HABS documentation per the Memorandum of Agreement concerning the proposed demolition of the historic property.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for NEPA Final Draft Including Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, as well as their associated Memorandum of Agreement. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anna McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Pending Environmental Assessment of Proposed Access Control Measures, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Switching Facility in Expanded NHL District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed new switching facility near the old Brooke Army Medical Center. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the expanded Historic Landmark District.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Building 5101, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking to demolish the building - specifically a request to incorporate the historic building into a new proposed dining facility, rather than demolish Building 5101. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Buildings 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101 and Building 5002. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Texas.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's latest information package for the Rehabilitation of Building 2264. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission states that the proposal, as presented, is not at a stage of development to make a formal determination of effect on the building and requests complete plans when they are...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Report for the Stabilization of the Gift Chapel Building 2200, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the report for the stabilization of the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposal for Privatization of Water Supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston requesting a determination of effect for the privatization of the water supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis on National Register eligible Buildings 3186, 2600, 2194, 6210, 6211, and HLF: L-28. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 238 and 240. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and requests photographic documentation for both buildings in order for the review to proceed. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have outlined their recommendations. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission's staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have determined that it will have no adverse effect on the historic property. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreements for Brooke Army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion North and South Buildings, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the Brooke army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion. The Commission staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and this letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for 65 Percent Construction Document Submittal for Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1. After review, the Commission has determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the historic theater. Copied to this correspondence is Michael Pumphrey, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the subject undertaking will require an amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330, due to PCE contamination. This letter serves a comment on the proposed undertaking and includes the signed amendment to the Memorandum associated with this undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio Conservation Society, and the City of San Antonio Historic Preservation Office.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Family Housing Unit Types, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of family housing unit types at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has completed its review of the documentation provided and has determined that the subject undertaking will have no adverse effect upon the specified housing in the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District, providing that the listed conditions in this correspondence are met.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Use of Building 6202, 6203, 6204 Officer's Quarters for MUAC Training, Camp Bullis, Texas (2004)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed project to use Buildings 6202, 6203, and 6204 Officer's Quarters for MUAC Training. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jack Higgins, Project Review for Building 601 and 602 Rehabilitation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment to Fort Sam Houston on their proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Buildings 601 and 602. Comments and concerns are addressed by the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schatter, Project Review for the Addition of a Canopy at Building 368, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission as completed its review of the proposed undertaking to add a canopy to Building 368. The Commission concurs with the determination that the proposed undertaking will have "no adverse effect" on the building, which is a contributing structure to the potential National Register District. Copied to this correspondence is Joan Gaither, Society for the Preservation of Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Further Project Review on Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed Karst Research at Camp Bullis. The Texas Historical Commission would very much like to establish and refine standard operating and documentation procedures when human remains are encountered during karst research work at Camp Bullis. Copied to this correspondence is Steve Austin and Dusty Bruns.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Project Review for Draft of Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the drafts of the Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plans. The Commission's review staff have recommendations regarding the archaeological, historical and architectural discussions within the ICRMP for Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis. This letter details these recommendations and concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Virginia Nicholas, Bexar County Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to James Graham, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Officers’ Club for Use as an RC1 Community Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2006)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of the Officers' Club for use as an RCI Community Center. The Commission has completed its initial review of the documentation provided and feel that the appropriate reuse of the building as a community center is feasible. The Commission requests additional information to determine the effects upon this cultural resource. Copied to this letter is David Brigham (Fort Sam...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Continued Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted a follow-up project review to the Texas Historical Commission for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter states that the documentation submitted is insufficient for concurrence by the Commission with Fort Sam Houston's determination.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Preconcept Proposal for Repair Windows Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the Preconcept Proposal from Fort Sam Houston for the window repair to Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Building 4019, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston concerning Building 4019. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Draft Preservation Assessment of the Beach Pavilion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston responding to the comments previously sent by the Commission. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. If the recommendations in this letter are implemented, the Commission will concur with the determination of "No Adverse Effect" for the proposed undertaking.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Plan to Stabilize Building 2200 Gift Chapel, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a plan to stabilize the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. After review, the Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for an investigation of the structural integrity of the historic building.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Replacement of Aluminum Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Colonel Thresher's letter on the proposed replacement of aluminum windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Structural Repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A-D, 167, and 172A-D Officer’s Quarters and Artillery Post, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the Advance Final Design for the structural repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A, 121B, 121C, 121D, 167, 172A, 172B, 172C, and 172D. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for this work.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Annual Report, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the annual report of activities effecting cultural resources. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is James Bruseth (Archeology Division) and Lee Keatinge (ACHP).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Parking Pads Near Buildings 2279-2284, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission a project review for parking pads near Buildings 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, and 2284. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submittal from Fort Sam Houston for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston for window replacement in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Replace Windows in Building 2376 Correction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a project review for window replacement in Building 2376. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Update on Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the updated information package submitted by Fort Sam Houston for the proposed window replacement in Building 2792. After review, the Commission has determined that the project, as currently proposed, would have an "adverse effect" on the building. The letter lists in detail the reasons for the Commission's determination.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review for Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the draft report, "Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis Military Reservation, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas." The Commission concurs with the determinations of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This letter serves as comment on the draft from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review of Revised Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the revised draft report of the Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites at Camp Bullis Military Reservation. The Commission concurs with the determination of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Copied to this correspondence is Jackie Schlatter (Fort Sam Houston) and Ross Fields (Prewitt and Associates, Inc.).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Proposed Review for New Housing Units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received additional information from Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed new housing units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area. The project proposes to build sixty new single family housing units. Based on the information provided, the Commission has determined that this project will have no adverse effect on historic properties at Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Stephen Austin, Draft Scope of Work: Inventory for Cultural Hydrogeologic and Biological Resources Associated with Upper Glen Rose Caves and Karst Features, 2000-2001 Season at Camp Bullis Military Reservation, San Antonio, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This is a project review by the Texas Historical Commission for the Draft Scope of Work: "Inventory for Cultural Hydrogeologic and Biological Resources Associated with Upper Glen Rose Caves and Karst Features, 2000-2001 Season at Camp Bullis Military Reservation, San Antonio, Texas." This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Wendy Martinson, Project Review for Draft EA and FONSI for Proposed Consolidated Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Fickel, Project Review for Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the proposed undertaking of Karsts Research at Camp Bullis. The Commission suggests that a Programmatic Agreement be developed to govern standard operating procedures when human remains or artifacts are disturbed during karst excavations at Camp Bullis.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review of Demolition of Buildings 4226 and 2013-2017 Beebe Loop, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the project review for the demolition of Buildings 4226, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 at Beebe Loop. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Loyce Ince, San Antonio Conservation Society.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Demolition and Selective Demolition Proposals, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical has received and reviewed a recent letter from Fort Sam Houston regarding demolition and selective demolition of historic properties. These actions are proposed to take advantage of facility reduction dollars available for this fiscal year. This letter outlines the Commission's detailed comments for each property under consideration for the proposed undertaking.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Rehabilitation of Building 1026, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review document from Fort Sam Houston regarding the rehabilitation of Building 1026. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" on the historic resource.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Tour Thank You, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1998)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission wrote this thank you to Fort Sam Houston for their hosted tour of the installation's historic resources and leading-edge medical facilities.
-
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Buildings 200 and 671 Alterations Without Prior Consultation, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter addresses the recently completed alterations at Randolph Air Force Base including Buildings 200 and 671. This document is part of a collection of memos, notes and original memorandums related to recent undertakings in Buildings 200 and 671, structures at Randolph Air Force Base that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Leonard Patrick, Proposed Elevator Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission completed its review of the document package of the proposed project of an elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission does not agree with Randolph's determination of No Adverse Effect and has written this letter at length to discuss the Commission's reasoning. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the southwest corner of the secondary elevation of Building 900,...
-
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
-
Response from Gary Vest to John Harper, Foreclosure of Undertakings for Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter concerning foreclosure for the rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence and associated documents concerning a complex proposal of undertakings for World War II temporary buildings located on Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Many of the documents are drafts and letters from internal circulation within Randolph Air Force Base.
-
Response from Harry Finke to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 C, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the Texas Historical Commission's conditions on the new lay-in ceiling in Building 675 C Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive material for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 C Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Jackie Schlatter to Mike Johnson, Fort Sam Houston ICRMP Discussion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Multiple correspondence concerning ICRMP specifics including dates of the amended PA, providing correct documentation to the SHPO and the need for a MACOM review of the final document. Copied to these letters is Joseph Murphey.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Camp Bullis Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Planning Division at Fort Worth, Texas, sent a draft of the Cultural Resource Management Plan to the Texas Historical Commission for review. The Commission believes that this document should be revised in accordance with enclosed recommendations to clarify issues and major topics.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Final Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston the final prehistoric research context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston. The document will be added to the Commission's library.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula, Comments on Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Programmatic Agreement (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission, Department of Antiquities Protection, has read and reviewed “Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston,” focusing on the prehistoric archeology of the two installations. The Commission notes that a similar overview for the historic archeological record has not been covered and asks what is the nature of the historic archeological data base. The Commission is in agreement with the basic conclusions of the study regarding the potential...
-
Response from James Bruseth to Cornelius Allen, Programmatic Agreement, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (1988)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence between the Texas Historical Commission and Directorate of Engineering and Housing at Fort Sam Houston concerning a programmatic agreement received by the Commission. Listed are general and specific comments by the Texas Historical Commission. Carbon copied to this letter is Paul McGuff, Bob Fink, and Stan Graves.
-
Response from James Bruseth to Lisa Orlando, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter, written by the Texas Historical Commission, gives a brief overview of the Fort Sam Houston Property. The correspondence was written for Lisa A. Orlando, Environmental Scientist, BSA Environmental Services, Inc..
-
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Ensch, Draft Report: A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season, Camp Bullis, Texas (1998)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received the draft archeological survey report from Fort Worth titled "A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season." The Commission wrote this letter to state their agreement with the conclusions of the authors of the report, which have been endorsed by the COE-FWD, and reviewed and approved by the Commission's National Register Division. Copied to this correspondence is Ross C. Fields and Karl W. Kibler, Co-Principal...
-
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Mocek, Draft Report of Archaeological Survey, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has reviewed the draft report entitled "Camp Bullis Archeological and Historical Investigations, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas: The 1989 Season."They find the report to be thorough and it is agreed that the assessment of the resources, specifically of the prehistoric and historic sights, is correct concerning their inclusion or non-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from James Graham to Emily Payne, Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission requested an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) relative to Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston. Because the old laundry facility site has been polluted with cleaning solvents over the course of time, the remaining portions of the building must be demolished in order to facilitate remediation of the property, and thus the need for an amendment. This letter contains the requested MOA amendment.
-
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Roof Replacement at Building 4192, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston provided the Texas Historical Commission with proposed design options for a roof replacement at Building 4192. This letter by the Commission stresses the importance of the roof replacement and that it may have a "profound" effect on the appearance of the historical building. The letter goes on to detail a review by the National Register Department.
-
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to William Fickel, Building 371 Comments, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Department of Architecture and the National Register Department of the Texas Historical Commission have written a letter of comments for the project involving Building 371. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger (Fort Sam Houston Preservation Architect) and Joseph Murphy (Fort Worth Corps of Engineers).
-
Response from James Steely to Joseph Logan, Building 156, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The National Register Department has conducted a review of Building 156 and has designated it as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and supportive documentation concerning Building 156, a World War II temporary building at Randolph Air Force Base. Most of the documents focus on the building's status in the National Register of Historic Places, as well as a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 156.
-
Response from Jessica Villarreal to Dee Brame, Alter Repair and Remove Asbestos Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base writes to recommend that the suspension of work be partially lifted and list in this letter the changes to be made by contractors within 7 working days. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter addressing the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building's interior and exterior features were rehabilitated prior to the completion of the Section 106 process. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and includes location maps,...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter with attachments that outline and give full detail on the proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments to these letters include location maps, historic data, undertaking description, and photographs. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter from Randolph Air Force Base to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation that details newly established steps to assist in meeting the requirements of Sections 110 and 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangar 12 Interior, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base is writing the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation to offer summary documentation on a proposed undertaking to rehabilitate the interior of Hangar 12. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Rehabilitation of Hangars 12, 13, and 64, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter in response to a sent Memorandum of Agreement for the proposed undertakings at Hangars 12, 13, and 64, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic reservation has reviewed the document and see it as generally acceptable. Included in the letter are some suggestions on how to improve the Memorandum of Agreement. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Claudia Nissley, Window Replacement at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking to replace the 80 original exterior windows in Building 661. This letter details the decision of adverse effect for the project. This letter is part of a group of notes and letters on the proposed rehabilitation and replacement of the eighty original exterior windows at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The proposed undertaking is under the SABER Contract.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Adverse Effect Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter, written by Randolph Air Force Base, concerns an adverse effect determination by the Texas Historical Commission on the undertaking to rehabilitate Building 901. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Building 598 Patio Tile Replacement, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking that may effect Building 598, built in the early 1930's, which is known to be potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning the proposed patio tile replacement at Building 598, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The historic structure is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and these letters discuss the possible effect the...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Confirmation by Randolph Air Force Base that the Texas Historical Commission has determined No Adverse Effect for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675's A Wing. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Hangar 12 Interior Work, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence concerning a question about the rehabilitation of the steel casement windows at Hangar 12, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Interior Rehabilitation of Hangar 12, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base is writing the Texas Historical Commission to add an additional undertaking to the list of projects approved for Hangar 12. The information concerns the installation of a double set of glass front doors at the north and south ends of the west side of the Hangar. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Modifications Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter with attachments that update plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Patio Tile Replacement Building 598, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base has reviewed the Texas Historical Commission's finding of Adverse Effect on the proposed project to replace the patio tiles at Building 598. As a result, the project is cancelled. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning the proposed patio tile replacement at Building 598, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The historic structure is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and these letters discuss the possible effect the...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Refurbishment of Building 900 Restroom, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base is considering an undertaking that may effect Building 900. This letter has attachments that include location maps, historic data, description and assessment, and photographs. This letter is part of correspondence on the refurbishment of bathrooms in Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 201 and Installation of New Fire Door in Original Opening, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter from the Texas Historical Commission stating that the State Historic Preservation Office conducted a review of Building 201 at Randolph Air Force Base and the proposed undertaking to install a new fire door. The Commission has decided that a final determination of eligibility will be made following the completion of a comprehensive survey and contextual development schedule. This letter is part of a set of letters concerning the installation of a new fire door in Building 201, Randolph...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter notifying that plans to remove windows and doors from Building 675 "A" Wing, at Randolph Air Force Base, have been halted. Doors and windows will not be removed from any building eligible for the National Register until the Section 106 process has been completed. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic...
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base writes this letter to the Texas Historical Commission on proposed modifications to the rehabilitation of Building 901. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of First Floor and Basement of Building 671, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence stating Randolph Air Force Base's acceptance of the Texas Historical Commission's conditions concerning the lay-in ceilings of Building 671 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Scott Shepherd, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Email addressing specifics and concerns about a proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Stanley Graves, Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter from Randolph Air Force Base to the Texas Historical Commission that details a recent walkthrough of Building 902 and the needed repairs and rehabilitation of the historic structure. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
-
Response from Lee Keatinge to Douglas Biggerstaff, Adverse Effect Notice Regarding the Proposed Demolition of Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Fort Sam Houston's notification and supporting documentation regarding the adverse effects of the proposed demolition of Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. After review, the Council does not believe that their participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
-
Response from Lee Keatinge to Douglas Biggerstaff, Adverse Effect Notice Regarding the Proposed Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, and 4115 Fort Sam Houston and Buildings 5101, 5102, and 5002 Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Fort Sam Houston's notification and supporting documentation regarding the adverse effects of the proposed demolition of Buildings 376, 377, and 411 at Fort Sam Houston, and Buildings 5101, 5102 and 5002 at Camp Bullis, Texas. Based on the information provided the Council has concluded that their participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
-
Response from Leonard Patrick to F. Lawerence Oaks, Acceptance of Design for the Handicap Ramp at Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the State Historical Preservation Office and the Texas Historical Commission's recommendations on the design of the handicap ramp at Building 901. Revised construction elevations are also included in a memo attached to this correspondence.
-
Response from Mario Sanchez to Richard Strimel, Repairs to Buildings 152 and 2791, Garage Replacement in 700 Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1988)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission is responding to Fort Sam Houston's projects concerning the repairs of Buildings 152 and 2791, as well as a garage replacement in the 700 area. After review in accordance with Section 106, the historical commission lists and details determinations for each project. Carbon copied to this letter of correspondence is Paul McGuff and Robert Fink.
-
Response from Mario Sanchez to Tad Stanley, Proposed Handicapped Access Chapel 1, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1989)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans submitted by Randolph Air Force Base regarding a proposed handicapped access for Chapel 1. The Commission has provided in this letter conditions to be met in order for a determination of "no adverse effect" to be met for the project. This letter is part of a large packet of correspondence addressing the proposed undertaking to grant handicapped access to Building 102, Main Chapel or Chapel 1, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas....
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to David Brigham, Project Review for Potential Demolition of Building 134, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission was contacted by Fort Sam Houston about the discussions related to potential demolition of historic Building 134. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Fort Sam Houston), Rolette Schreckenghost (San Antonio Conservation Society), and Shanon Peterson (City of San...
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to Michael Grizer, Project Review for Reconstruction of Duck Pond at Quadrangle, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed reconstruction of the duck pond at Quadrangle. This letter serves as comment on the best design option for the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is David Brigham, Cultural Resource Manager, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed New Elevators at Officer's Club Building 500, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has completed its review of the documentation provided by Randolph Air Force Base for the proposed project of new elevators at the Officer's Club, Building 500. It was determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on the structure's historic district.
-
Response from Michael Grizer to Mark Wolfe, Rehabilitation of Building 133 Staff Judge Advocate Courthouse, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as a reply from Joint Base San Antonio at Fort Sam Houston regarding their proposal to rehabilitate Building 133 for the Staff Judge Advocate Courthouse. Included in this correspondence are salient issues given by the Texas Historical Commission and Joint Base San Antonio's responses to these issues.