The Department of the Air Force (DAF) is charged by federal law and statutes to identify, evaluate, and protect important cultural and historical properties on DAF land for the benefit of this and future generations of Americans. In executing these mandates, DAF has produced several thousand professional quality monographs, reports, and studies that record valuable data and insights on our Nation’s history and prehistory, as reflected on our installations and ranges. The Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) has partnered with Digital Antiquity and Argonne National Laboratory to curate these resources in the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR).
Since 2011, Digital Antiquity has worked with Air Force installations to establish a system for digitally curating DAF cultural resources documents and making those documents available to approved users. Installations have the ability to organize their file types in a way that is useful for their needs, while providing controlled levels of access to approved users.
This is the main collection for DAF. Here you can find collections of documents, data, images, and other digital information generated from and/or related to archaeological and other cultural resources and investigations on or nearby DAF facilities. The collection was created by the Center for Digital Antiquity in cooperation with US Air Force, US Space Force, and Air National Guard Cultural Resources Management personnel.
Site Name Keywords
Belle Chance •
Scott Air Force Base Historic District •
Building 1966 •
Building 1967 •
18PR447 •
Chapel II •
Building 1968 •
50-80-15-4853 •
LA 38135 •
8BR00085
Site Type Keywords
Non-Domestic Structures •
Governmental Structure •
Historic Governmental Structure •
Archaeological Feature •
Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex •
Military Structure •
Artifact Scatter •
Domestic Structures •
Resource Extraction / Production / Transportation Structure or Features •
House
Other Keywords
National Register of Historic Places •
Melrose Air Force Range •
NRHP •
Cannon AFB •
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station •
Site Records •
Map •
OAHP •
Camp Bullis Survey •
Site Form
Culture Keywords
Historic •
Archaic •
Woodland •
PaleoIndian •
Prehistoric •
Late Archaic •
Euroamerican •
Middle Woodland •
Middle Archaic •
Early Woodland
Investigation Types
Heritage Management •
Reconnaissance / Survey •
Architectural Documentation •
Historic Background Research •
Architectural Survey •
Site Evaluation / Testing •
Archaeological Overview •
Records Search / Inventory Checking •
Systematic Survey •
Consultation
Material Types
Chipped Stone •
Ceramic •
Chert •
Glass •
Metal •
Building Materials •
Fauna •
Shell •
Fire Cracked Rock •
Ground Stone
Temporal Keywords
Historic •
Prehistoric •
Cold War •
20th Century •
Cold War Era •
World War II •
19th Century •
WWII •
Archaic •
18th Century
Geographic Keywords
United States of America (Country) •
North America (Continent) •
USA (Country) •
Texas (State / Territory) •
Bexar County (County) •
Texas •
San Antonio •
Bexar (County) •
New Mexico (State / Territory) •
California (State / Territory)
Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 7,201-7,300 of 8,682)
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 2792 Wallpaper and Paint, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's proposal to wallpaper and paint the hallways in Building 2792. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no effect" on the historic structure.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Buildings 122, 124, and 125, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's alterations to Buildings 122, 124, and 125. All of the Commission's recommendations have been followed. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 Guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Ceiling Fans in Fifteen Quarters on Staff Post, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted an information package to the Texas Historical Commission on the installation of ceiling fans in fifteen quarters on Staff Post. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" and request that the ceiling fans be simple in design. Copied to this correspondence is David Brigham, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank 95 Percent Plans, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed the 95% level plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston in their determination of "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has determined that the design will have "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Form 1391 for Building 2376 Beach Pavilion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter confirms that the Texas Historical Commission received from Fort Sam Houston the form 1391 Report to be submitted to the U.S. Army Command to initiate funding for the project on Building 2376, Beach Pavilion. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Officers' Club Alterations Proposal, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter is in response to the proposed alterations to the Officers’ Club at Fort Sam Houston. Per the Texas Historical Commission’s visit on April 13, 1994, with Kinnison and Associates and with Michael Hilger, the Commission is enclosing its recommendations as well as determination of effect to the structure. Much of the undertaking involves mechanical upgrading of the mechanical system and some asbestos abatement. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort...
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Raven Room Canopy Installation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the proposal to install a canopy over the entrance to the Raven Room at the Officers' Club. The Commission concurs with the determination of "adverse effect." This letter gives the Commission's recommendations for alterations to the proposal.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Temporary Building, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed information submitted by Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed installation of a relocatable building. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no effect" in accordance with Section 106 guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition and Replacement of Building 2791, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the demolition and replacement of Building 2791, a Category I property located within the proposed expansion of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The information provided by Fort Sam Houston did not include an analysis of alternatives that may avoid or minimize the potential adverse effect of this undertaking. The Council requests that Fort Sam Houston inform the Society for...
-
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition of Building 238, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has received and reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the proposed demolition of Building 238, a Category I property located within the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Council is interested in the opinions of the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, and the San Antonio Conservation Society regarding the disposition and treatment of...
-
Response from Elizabeth Butman to Michael Grizer, Project Review of Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 133, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Elizabeth Butman, has completed its review of project documentation received on January 17, 2012. Based on this material, the proposed undertaking consists of the rehabilitation of Building 133 for use as courthouse for the Staff Judge Advocate. This building is listed in the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Commission found that the proposed changes do not meet the...
-
Response from Elton Prewitt to James Steely, PAI Reports of Investigations No. 75, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence citing need for better coordination between departments in the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Project Review for Cold War-Era Building and Structure Inventory and Assessment, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff from the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bob Brinkman, has reviewed the submitted information and concur with the determinations of eligibility including that of Building 40 and Building 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Bruce R. Nadler, Project Review of New Canopy and Alterations to Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bradford Patterson, has completed its review of the proposed alterations to Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed alterations will have no adverse effect on Hangar 63 or its National Historic Landmark District.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Colonel Patrick, Project Review of Flagstone Sidewalks, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received a submittal from Randolph Air Force Base to replace the historic flagstone sidewalks with concrete. After review, and because of the sidewalks' installation in the 1930s, the Commission sees the existing flagstone sidewalks as a contributor to the character of the district and their replacement with concrete does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The standards...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Determination for Rehabilitation of Building 128 (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received further correspondence from Fort Sam Houston regarding the undertaking for Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and the proposed changes to Building 128 will cause no adverse effect on the historic building or the historic district. Copied to this letter is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided. This letter details the Commission's concerns and recommendations for the proposed undertakings. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project of Building 2000-2001's rehabilitation. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and requests more information before a final review can be completed of the project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project to rehabilitate Building 2264. The Commission's review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and have written this letter outlining its concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Theatre 1 Building 2270, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review for the rehabilitation of Theatre #1, Building 2270, at Fort Sam Houston. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and has determined that sufficient information has not been provided to complete the review of the project. This letter serves as comment and gives a list of requests for correct documentation. Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Revise for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston further correspondence and revisions for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001. This letter seres as additional comment and lists concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the rehabilitation of Building 128. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking including proposed changes from the State Historic Preservation Officer.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas A. Biggerstaff, Project Review for the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking of the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Draft Memorandum of Agreement for the Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the draft Memorandum of Agreement for the demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102. The Commission approves of the draft MOA, but requests specific language be used in Stipulation I (detailed in this letter). Copied to this correspondence is Jill Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nichols (Bexar County...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Environmental Assessment Document for New Housing Construction in Patch-Chaffee Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the environmental assessment from Fort Sam Houston for proposed new housing construction in the Patch-Chaffee Area at Fort Sam Houston. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Memorandum of Agreement Building 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received from Fort Sam Houston correspondence describing Building 5002. After review, the Commission has signed the Memorandum of Agreement submitted for the demolition of Building 5002 at Camp Bullis.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, MOA on Demolition of Building 1030, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's request for a signature of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow the demolition of Building 1030. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission is specifically writing to halt the demolition of Building 1030 since the MOA originally allowing the undertaking was signed in error.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Building 1030 HABS Documentation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the undertaking for Building 1030. The Commission has reviewed the documentation provided an agrees that it fulfills Fort Sam Houston's obligation to provide HABS documentation per the Memorandum of Agreement concerning the proposed demolition of the historic property.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for NEPA Final Draft Including Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, as well as their associated Memorandum of Agreement. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anna McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Pending Environmental Assessment of Proposed Access Control Measures, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Switching Facility in Expanded NHL District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed new switching facility near the old Brooke Army Medical Center. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the expanded Historic Landmark District.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's latest information package for the Rehabilitation of Building 2264. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission states that the proposal, as presented, is not at a stage of development to make a formal determination of effect on the building and requests complete plans when they are...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Report for the Stabilization of the Gift Chapel Building 2200, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the report for the stabilization of the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposal for Privatization of Water Supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston requesting a determination of effect for the privatization of the water supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis on National Register eligible Buildings 3186, 2600, 2194, 6210, 6211, and HLF: L-28. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 238 and 240. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and requests photographic documentation for both buildings in order for the review to proceed. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission's staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have determined that it will have no adverse effect on the historic property. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreements for Brooke Army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion North and South Buildings, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the Brooke army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion. The Commission staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and this letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for 65 Percent Construction Document Submittal for Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1. After review, the Commission has determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the historic theater. Copied to this correspondence is Michael Pumphrey, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330, due to PCE contamination. This letter serves a comment on the proposed undertaking and includes the signed amendment to the Memorandum associated with this undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio Conservation Society, and the City of San Antonio Historic Preservation Office.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the subject undertaking will require an amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Family Housing Unit Types, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of family housing unit types at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has completed its review of the documentation provided and has determined that the subject undertaking will have no adverse effect upon the specified housing in the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District, providing that the listed conditions in this correspondence are met.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jack Higgins, Project Review for Building 601 and 602 Rehabilitation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment to Fort Sam Houston on their proposed undertaking to rehabilitate Buildings 601 and 602. Comments and concerns are addressed by the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schatter, Project Review for the Addition of a Canopy at Building 368, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission as completed its review of the proposed undertaking to add a canopy to Building 368. The Commission concurs with the determination that the proposed undertaking will have "no adverse effect" on the building, which is a contributing structure to the potential National Register District. Copied to this correspondence is Joan Gaither, Society for the Preservation of Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Further Project Review on Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed Karst Research at Camp Bullis. The Texas Historical Commission would very much like to establish and refine standard operating and documentation procedures when human remains are encountered during karst research work at Camp Bullis. Copied to this correspondence is Steve Austin and Dusty Bruns.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Jackie Schlatter, Project Review for Draft of Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the drafts of the Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plans. The Commission's review staff have recommendations regarding the archaeological, historical and architectural discussions within the ICRMP for Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis. This letter details these recommendations and concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Virginia Nicholas, Bexar County Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to James Graham, Project Review for Proposed Rehabilitation of Officers’ Club for Use as an RC1 Community Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2006)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of the Officers' Club for use as an RCI Community Center. The Commission has completed its initial review of the documentation provided and feel that the appropriate reuse of the building as a community center is feasible. The Commission requests additional information to determine the effects upon this cultural resource. Copied to this letter is David Brigham (Fort Sam...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Continued Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted a follow-up project review to the Texas Historical Commission for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter states that the documentation submitted is insufficient for concurrence by the Commission with Fort Sam Houston's determination.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Preconcept Proposal for Repair Windows Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the Preconcept Proposal from Fort Sam Houston for the window repair to Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Building 4019, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston concerning Building 4019. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Draft Preservation Assessment of the Beach Pavilion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston responding to the comments previously sent by the Commission. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. If the recommendations in this letter are implemented, the Commission will concur with the determination of "No Adverse Effect" for the proposed undertaking.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Plan to Stabilize Building 2200 Gift Chapel, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a plan to stabilize the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. After review, the Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for an investigation of the structural integrity of the historic building.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Replacement of Aluminum Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Colonel Thresher's letter on the proposed replacement of aluminum windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review for Structural Repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A-D, 167, and 172A-D Officer’s Quarters and Artillery Post, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the Advance Final Design for the structural repairs to Buildings 104, 114, 116, 121A, 121B, 121C, 121D, 167, 172A, 172B, 172C, and 172D. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" for this work.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Annual Report, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the annual report of activities effecting cultural resources. This letter serves as comment on the document from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is James Bruseth (Archeology Division) and Lee Keatinge (ACHP).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review of Parking Pads Near Buildings 2279-2284, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission a project review for parking pads near Buildings 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, and 2284. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submittal from Fort Sam Houston for the replacement of windows in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a project review submitted by Fort Sam Houston for window replacement in Building 2792. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Replace Windows in Building 2376 Correction, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of a project review for window replacement in Building 2376. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to John Brenneman, Update on Project Review to Replace Windows in Building 2792, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the updated information package submitted by Fort Sam Houston for the proposed window replacement in Building 2792. After review, the Commission has determined that the project, as currently proposed, would have an "adverse effect" on the building. The letter lists in detail the reasons for the Commission's determination.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review for Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the draft report, "Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis Military Reservation, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas." The Commission concurs with the determinations of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This letter serves as comment on the draft from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Project Review of Revised Draft Report: Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites, Camp Bullis, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed from Fort Sam Houston the revised draft report of the Cultural Resources Survey of 4423 Acres and National Register Testing at Five Prehistoric Sites at Camp Bullis Military Reservation. The Commission concurs with the determination of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Copied to this correspondence is Jackie Schlatter (Fort Sam Houston) and Ross Fields (Prewitt and Associates, Inc.).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Martha Sanders, Proposed Review for New Housing Units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received additional information from Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed new housing units in Patch-Chaffee Housing Area. The project proposes to build sixty new single family housing units. Based on the information provided, the Commission has determined that this project will have no adverse effect on historic properties at Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Stephen Austin, Draft Scope of Work: Inventory for Cultural Hydrogeologic and Biological Resources Associated with Upper Glen Rose Caves and Karst Features, 2000-2001 Season at Camp Bullis Military Reservation, San Antonio, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This is a project review by the Texas Historical Commission for the Draft Scope of Work: "Inventory for Cultural Hydrogeologic and Biological Resources Associated with Upper Glen Rose Caves and Karst Features, 2000-2001 Season at Camp Bullis Military Reservation, San Antonio, Texas." This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Wendy Martinson, Project Review for Draft EA and FONSI for Proposed Consolidated Dining Facility, Camp Bullis, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence rom Fort Sam Houston describing the draft Environmental Assessment and FONSI associated with the proposed consolidated dining facility at Camp Bullis. The Commission has completed its initial review of the project documentation provided and commends the decision to adaptively reuse Building 5101. This letter serves as comment and offers concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Fickel, Project Review for Karst Research at Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment by the Texas Historical Commission on the proposed undertaking of Karsts Research at Camp Bullis. The Commission suggests that a Programmatic Agreement be developed to govern standard operating procedures when human remains or artifacts are disturbed during karst excavations at Camp Bullis.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review of Demolition of Buildings 4226 and 2013-2017 Beebe Loop, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the project review for the demolition of Buildings 4226, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 at Beebe Loop. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Loyce Ince, San Antonio Conservation Society.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Project Review Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Demolition and Selective Demolition Proposals, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical has received and reviewed a recent letter from Fort Sam Houston regarding demolition and selective demolition of historic properties. These actions are proposed to take advantage of facility reduction dollars available for this fiscal year. This letter outlines the Commission's detailed comments for each property under consideration for the proposed undertaking.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Rehabilitation of Building 1026, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review document from Fort Sam Houston regarding the rehabilitation of Building 1026. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Preservation Office, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" on the historic resource.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to William Thresher, Tour Thank You, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1998)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission wrote this thank you to Fort Sam Houston for their hosted tour of the installation's historic resources and leading-edge medical facilities.
-
Response from F. Lawrence Oaks to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed Construction of Vestibule and Windows at Hangar 64, Randolph Air Fore Base, Texas (2006)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Emily Thompson Payne, has completed its review of the project documentation. Based on the information submitted, it has been determined that construction of a vestibule and installation of windows will have no adverse effect given that they will occur on the non-original lean-to and on a secondary elevation of the hangar.
-
Response from Jackie Schlatter to Mike Johnson, Fort Sam Houston ICRMP Discussion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Multiple correspondence concerning ICRMP specifics including dates of the amended PA, providing correct documentation to the SHPO and the need for a MACOM review of the final document. Copied to these letters is Joseph Murphey.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Camp Bullis Cultural Resource Management Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Planning Division at Fort Worth, Texas, sent a draft of the Cultural Resource Management Plan to the Texas Historical Commission for review. The Commission believes that this document should be revised in accordance with enclosed recommendations to clarify issues and major topics.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula to William Fickel, Final Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston the final prehistoric research context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston. The document will be added to the Commission's library.
-
Response from James Bruseth and Timothy Perttula, Comments on Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Programmatic Agreement (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission, Department of Antiquities Protection, has read and reviewed “Prehistoric Research Context for Camp Bullis and Fort Sam Houston,” focusing on the prehistoric archeology of the two installations. The Commission notes that a similar overview for the historic archeological record has not been covered and asks what is the nature of the historic archeological data base. The Commission is in agreement with the basic conclusions of the study regarding the potential...
-
Response from James Bruseth to Cornelius Allen, Programmatic Agreement, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (1988)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence between the Texas Historical Commission and Directorate of Engineering and Housing at Fort Sam Houston concerning a programmatic agreement received by the Commission. Listed are general and specific comments by the Texas Historical Commission. Carbon copied to this letter is Paul McGuff, Bob Fink, and Stan Graves.
-
Response from James Bruseth to Lisa Orlando, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter, written by the Texas Historical Commission, gives a brief overview of the Fort Sam Houston Property. The correspondence was written for Lisa A. Orlando, Environmental Scientist, BSA Environmental Services, Inc..
-
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Ensch, Draft Report: A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season, Camp Bullis, Texas (1998)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received the draft archeological survey report from Fort Worth titled "A Cultural Resources Survey of Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas: The 1996 Season." The Commission wrote this letter to state their agreement with the conclusions of the authors of the report, which have been endorsed by the COE-FWD, and reviewed and approved by the Commission's National Register Division. Copied to this correspondence is Ross C. Fields and Karl W. Kibler, Co-Principal...
-
Response from James Bruseth to Michael Mocek, Draft Report of Archaeological Survey, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has reviewed the draft report entitled "Camp Bullis Archeological and Historical Investigations, Bexar and Comal Counties, Texas: The 1989 Season."They find the report to be thorough and it is agreed that the assessment of the resources, specifically of the prehistoric and historic sights, is correct concerning their inclusion or non-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from James Graham to Emily Payne, Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission requested an amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) relative to Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston. Because the old laundry facility site has been polluted with cleaning solvents over the course of time, the remaining portions of the building must be demolished in order to facilitate remediation of the property, and thus the need for an amendment. This letter contains the requested MOA amendment.
-
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to John Brenneman, Roof Replacement at Building 4192, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston provided the Texas Historical Commission with proposed design options for a roof replacement at Building 4192. This letter by the Commission stresses the importance of the roof replacement and that it may have a "profound" effect on the appearance of the historical building. The letter goes on to detail a review by the National Register Department.
-
Response from James Steely and Stanley Graves to William Fickel, Building 371 Comments, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Department of Architecture and the National Register Department of the Texas Historical Commission have written a letter of comments for the project involving Building 371. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger (Fort Sam Houston Preservation Architect) and Joseph Murphy (Fort Worth Corps of Engineers).
-
Response from John Harper to Donald Rice, Rehabilitation of Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force’s actions to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for its undertakings to rehabilitate Buildings 902, 216, 661, and 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Council s not yet decided if it is possible to determine if the documentation and measures presented will remedy the problem and result in compliance with Section 106.
-
Response from Joseph Logan to Curtis Tunnell, Rehabilitation of First Floor and Basement of Building 671, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence stating Randolph Air Force Base's acceptance of the Texas Historical Commission's conditions concerning the lay-in ceilings of Building 671 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Lee Keatinge to Douglas Biggerstaff, Adverse Effect Notice Regarding the Proposed Demolition of Building 330, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Fort Sam Houston's notification and supporting documentation regarding the adverse effects of the proposed demolition of Building 330 at Fort Sam Houston, Texas. After review, the Council does not believe that their participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
-
Response from Lee Keatinge to Douglas Biggerstaff, Adverse Effect Notice Regarding the Proposed Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, and 4115 Fort Sam Houston and Buildings 5101, 5102, and 5002 Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Fort Sam Houston's notification and supporting documentation regarding the adverse effects of the proposed demolition of Buildings 376, 377, and 411 at Fort Sam Houston, and Buildings 5101, 5102 and 5002 at Camp Bullis, Texas. Based on the information provided the Council has concluded that their participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
-
Response from Leonard Patrick to F. Lawerence Oaks, Acceptance of Design for the Handicap Ramp at Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Randolph Air Force Base has accepted the State Historical Preservation Office and the Texas Historical Commission's recommendations on the design of the handicap ramp at Building 901. Revised construction elevations are also included in a memo attached to this correspondence.
-
Response from Mario Sanchez to Richard Strimel, Repairs to Buildings 152 and 2791, Garage Replacement in 700 Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1988)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission is responding to Fort Sam Houston's projects concerning the repairs of Buildings 152 and 2791, as well as a garage replacement in the 700 area. After review in accordance with Section 106, the historical commission lists and details determinations for each project. Carbon copied to this letter of correspondence is Paul McGuff and Robert Fink.
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to David Brigham, Project Review for Potential Demolition of Building 134, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission was contacted by Fort Sam Houston about the discussions related to potential demolition of historic Building 134. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Fort Sam Houston), Rolette Schreckenghost (San Antonio Conservation Society), and Shanon Peterson (City of San...
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to Michael Grizer, Project Review for Reconstruction of Duck Pond at Quadrangle, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed reconstruction of the duck pond at Quadrangle. This letter serves as comment on the best design option for the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is David Brigham, Cultural Resource Manager, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Mark Wolfe to Richard Trevino, Project Review of Proposed New Elevators at Officer's Club Building 500, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has completed its review of the documentation provided by Randolph Air Force Base for the proposed project of new elevators at the Officer's Club, Building 500. It was determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on the structure's historic district.
-
Response from Michael Grizer to Mark Wolfe, Rehabilitation of Building 133 Staff Judge Advocate Courthouse, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as a reply from Joint Base San Antonio at Fort Sam Houston regarding their proposal to rehabilitate Building 133 for the Staff Judge Advocate Courthouse. Included in this correspondence are salient issues given by the Texas Historical Commission and Joint Base San Antonio's responses to these issues.
-
Response from Patience Patterson to Jackie Schlatter, ICRMP and the Involvement of the State Historic Preservation Office in NAGPRA Related Issues, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This correspondence addresses the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) desire, and the suggestion of the Texas Historical Commission, to be involved in NAGPRA-related issues at Fort Sam Houston. Copied to this series of letters is Mike C. Johnson, Fort Sam, Houston.
-
Response from Richard Trevino to Jaime A. Agudelo, Review of the Randolph Air Force Base Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan, Randolph Air Force Base (2008)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A response by the Chief of Natural Environment to a letter from 12 MSG/CE citing that the ICRMP for Randolph Air Force Base is not due for review in the year 2008 and therefore a new ICRMP is not necessary.
-
Response from Ritch Woods to Scott Shepherd, Interior Painting Building 100 Taj Mahal, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Discussion of color options for the interior painting of the Taj Mahal, Building 100, at Randolph Air Force Base.