Air Force - West
Site Name Keywords
LA 38135 •
LA 2014 •
CA-SBA-503 •
LA 69739 •
CA-SBA-209 •
CA-SBA-793 •
CA-SBA-550 •
LA 69738 •
LA87373 •
Boles Wells
Site Type Keywords
Non-Domestic Structures •
Governmental Structure •
Historic Governmental Structure •
Archaeological Feature •
Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex •
Military Structure •
Artifact Scatter •
Domestic Structures •
Resource Extraction / Production / Transportation Structure or Features •
Midden
Other Keywords
Melrose Air Force Range •
Cannon AFB •
NRHP •
National Register of Historic Places •
Site Records •
Map •
OAHP •
Camp Bullis Survey •
SHPO •
Cannon Air Force Base
Culture Keywords
Historic •
Archaic •
Prehistoric •
Ancestral Puebloan •
Anasazi •
PaleoIndian •
Chumash •
Late Archaic •
Middle Archaic •
Euroamerican
Investigation Types
Heritage Management •
Reconnaissance / Survey •
Architectural Documentation •
Architectural Survey •
Historic Background Research •
Site Evaluation / Testing •
Records Search / Inventory Checking •
Archaeological Overview •
Consultation •
Systematic Survey
Material Types
Chipped Stone •
Chert •
Ceramic •
Glass •
Metal •
Ground Stone •
Shell •
Building Materials •
Fauna •
Fire Cracked Rock
Temporal Keywords
Historic •
Prehistoric •
WWII •
Cold War •
World War II •
Cold War Era •
20th Century •
Coalition period •
1940s •
1930s
Geographic Keywords
United States of America (Country) •
North America (Continent) •
USA (Country) •
Texas (State / Territory) •
Bexar County (County) •
Texas •
San Antonio •
Bexar (County) •
New Mexico (State / Territory) •
California (State / Territory)
Resources Inside This Collection (Viewing 4,701-4,800 of 6,280)
-
Research Design and Work Plan for a Cultural Resource Survey and NRHP Eligibility Assessment of 100 Acres on Cannon Air Force Range, Curry County, New Mexico (2015)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This document provides a work plan for the proposed archaeological inventory survey and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility assessment of 100 acres within the boundaries of Cannon Air Force Base (CAFB), Curry County, New Mexico.
-
Research Design and Work Plan: Data Recovery Investigations at Seven Archaeological Sites in the Proposed Atlas Photovoltaic Development Footprint, Holloman Air Force Base, Otero County, New Mexico (2015)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Jim deVos
The following research design outlines the proposed data recovery efforts to mitigate the adverse effects to seven archaeological sites that fall within the Atlas Photovoltaic Development (PVD) footprint. The seven sites include LA 103408 (HAR 049), LA 108699 (HAR 199), LA 111253 (HAR 232), LA 168646 (HAR 366), LA 168650 (HAR 367), LA 168653 (HAR 369) and LA 168655 (HAR 371); all are located on Holloman Air Force Base (Holloman AFB) in Otero County, New Mexico.
-
Research Design Archaeological Characterization Sampling For the EC South Range, Nevada Test and Training Range, Nellis Air Force Base (2008)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The purpose of this project is to conduct a characterization sampling study for the EC South which includes a portion of Quartz Mountain. They are mountainous areas that research has demonstrated has high potential for identifying significant sites. This project is a 4% sample of 200,000 acres to identify eligible sites for preservation, management with the mission, and Native American visitation.
-
Research Design For An Archaeological Characterization Study On Portions of Belted Range and Kawich Valley (Range 74) Nevada Test and Training Range (2009)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
An ongoing task of cultural resource inventories on the NTTR is the characterization of various numbered ranges and/or environmental regions as archaeological landscapes. How to characterize an archaeological region is an intentionally vague and open-ended question. This engenders a variety of research approaches that in turn generate data on a range of topics relevant to the study of prehistory and ethnography in the southern Great Basin and northern Mojave Desert.
-
A Research Design to Conduct an Archaeological Characterization Study of the Belted Range and Southern Kawich Valley, Nevada Test and Training Range, Nellis Air Force Base (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. (Far Western), was retained by Nellis Air Force Base (AFB) to complete a research design to conduct an archaeological characterization study of the Belted Range and southern Kawich Valley as part of the Air Force’s ongoing Section 110 compliance. The following research design includes a synthesis of existing data on the environmental context and known archaeology of the area, and provides an issue-oriented research and sampling methodology for...
-
Research Design to Mitigate the Adverse Effect on NM 0:3:1:11 (LA 87432), Kirtland Air Force Base (1981)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
At the request of the U.S. Air Force, the Center for Anthropological Studies has completed a research design to mitigate the ongoing natural erosion of NM 0:3:1:11 (LA 87432). This is a prehistoric Rio Grande Anasazi habitation site believed to have been used during A.D. 1100-1200. The acceptance and use of this research design to guide the recovery of this site's archaeological data is considered justification for making a determination of no adverse effect upon it.
-
Reservation Boundary and Land Use, Master Plan, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1955)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin
This map is the master plan of Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas, as of December 1955. TheReservation boundary and land use are visually explained in detail and include: Headquarters Fourth Army, Brooke Army Medical Center, National Cemetery, Post Activities, Wherry Housing, Officer Housing, N.C.O. Housing, Enlisted Personnel Housing, Magazine Area, Warehouse and Shop Area, Elementary School, and U.S. Army Reserves. The San Antonio Air Force Station is also indicated, but in brief overview....
-
Resolution of the Tohono O'odham Legislative Council (Opposition on use of the Nation's Air Space and Aboriginal Lands by the United States Air Force) (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez
Resolution by the Tohono O’odham Nation in opposition of the continued use of the Nation’s airspace and aboriginal lands by the United States Air Force. Includes military impacts report and signed resolution by the Tohono O'odham Legislative Council.
-
Resources Impact Survey for the Mare Tank F-16 Mishap, Sierra County, NM (2016)
DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Jim deVos
Approximately 16.06 acres of public land administered by the Las Cruces District Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Department of Interior, were affected by the 25 November 2015 F-16 aircraft mishap and the response work associated with accessing, securing, investigating and recovering the aircraft.
-
Response Draft from Scott Shepherd to Cantu, Building 907 Doors at North and South Basement Entrances, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2008)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
An evaluation was conducted on Building 907 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the basement entrance door project will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.
-
Response Draft from Scott Shepherd to Moore, Building 907 Screen Guards, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2008)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
An evaluation was conducted on Building 907 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the project involving the screen guards on the building will have no Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.
-
Response from 902 MSG/CEAN to 12 MSG/CEO, Exterior Awnings Hangar 62, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2011)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
An evaluation was conducted on Hangar 62 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. It was further determined that the proposed action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or on the landmark district.
-
Response from Amy Dase to Joseph Logan, AF Building 208, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Letter of correspondence from the Texas Historical Commission offering clarification on meeting discussions and agreements between the Commission and Randolph Air Force Base concerning the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208. This document is part of a collection of correspondence concerning the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208, a historic Post Garage, at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included are letters of correspondence, Q.M.C. forms, location maps, blueprints and photographs of...
-
Response from Amy Dase to Joseph Logan, Building 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The State Historic Preservation Office has conducted a review of Building 675 at Randolph Air Force Base by applying state and federal criteria for historical designation. It was determined that this property is potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
-
Response from Brian Miller to Claudia Nissley, Off-Street Parking Areas, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
In this subject letter, Randolph Air Force Base determined that a finding of "no adverse effect" would be appropriate and consistent for the construction of perpendicular parking lots in the Duplex Housing Area. Copied to this correspondence is Curtis Tunnell (Texas SHPO) and Jack Siegel (HQ AETC/CEPN).
-
Response from Brian Miller to Claudia Nissley, Off-Street Parking Areas, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
There was verbal consultation between Randolph Air Force Base and the staff of the Texas SHPO concerning the construction of perpendicular parking lots in Duplex Housing. A disagreement over the determination of effect and the required submittal of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) resulted. Randolph Air Force Base believes that a determination of No Adverse Effect is more appropriate and consistent; therefore, in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.5(d)(ii), Randolph exercises its option to submit...
-
Response from Brian Miller to Claudia Nissley, Pre-cast Concrete Fence Plan, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter addresses the determination of no adverse effect for the proposed pre-cast concrete fence plan at Randolph Air Force Base.
-
Response from Brian Miller to Curtis Tunnell, Pre-cast Concrete Fence Plan, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter is in response to the Texas Historical Commission's request for additional information, including a map and proposed construction drawings, for the proposed installation of pre-cast concrete fencing. It was also determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on the eligible buildings and the proposed historic district.
-
Response from Brian Miller to Curtis Tunnell, Request for Reconsideration of Determination for Off-Street Parking Area, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1996)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter addresses a disagreement between the State Historical Preservation Office and Randolph Air Force Base concerning the determination of effect for the construction of perpendicular parking lots in Duplex Housing. This letter serves as comment by Fort Sam Houston in requesting that the State Historical Preservation Office reconsider their "adverse effect" determination of the undertaking and the requirement that an MOA be prepared. Copied to this correspondence is Claudia Nissley...
-
Response from Caroline Wright to David Brigham, Project Review of the Proposed Work at Camp Bullis, Bexar County, Texas (2008)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from Caroline Wright to James Graham, Proposed Deconstruction of Building 293, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking to deconstruct Building 293 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The review staff concurs that the deconstruction will have an Adverse Effect on the historic district.
-
Response from Caroline Wright to Leon Spradling, Project Review for New Static Airplane Display, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2010)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer on the proposed undertaking of a new static airplane display at Randolph Air Force Base. After review, SHPO has determined "no adverse effect" on historic properties within the Area of Potential Effect.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter addressing the review of documentation regarding the rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation agrees with the steps the Air Force has taken to coordinate undertakings affecting historic properties, but emphasizes the importance of notifying the Council first before the commencement of a project. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the outlined measures taken by the Air Force to meet the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act and the status of the rehabilitation project at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 901, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the measures taken and reported by the Air Force to meet the requirements of Section 110 and 106. The Council agrees with the steps that have been taken to coordinate all undertakings and encourages the importance of coordination between the Air Force and the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a large group of correspondence and supportive material for the updated plans and specifications to Building 901, Randolph Air...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council has received Randolph Air Force Base's letter that outlines the measures taken to meet the requirements of Section 110 and 106 for the rehabilitation project at Building 902. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Donald Peterson, Rehabilitation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter is a response to the letter from Randolph Air Force Base that outlined the measures taken by the Air Force to meet the requirements of Section 106 and information of the status of the rehabilitation project at Building 902.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Harry Finke, Replacement of Windows Buildings 661 and 675, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Concluding correspondence regarding the replacement of the original windows in Buildings 661 and the "B"Wing of Building 675 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This correspondence is part of a group of letters on a proposed electrical repair of the existing elevator in Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include location maps, historic data, description and assessment, and photographs.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Interior Rehabilitation of Hangar 12, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council has reviewed Randolph Air Force Base's documentation on no adverse effect determination for the proposed interior rehabilitation of Hangar 12. The Council concurs with the determination of no adverse effect. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning rehabilitation projects for Hangars 12, 13, and 64 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Proposed projects includes new entrance canopies, replacement of external doors, and interior rehabilitation.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 208, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation Randolph Air Force Base has provided regarding the determination of no adverse effect for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208. The property is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places however, the Council does not object to the finding of no adverse effect. This document is part of a collection of correspondence concerning the proposed rehabilitation of Building 208, a historic Post...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation sent by Randolph Air Force Base regarding the no adverse effect determination for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 663. The Council does not object to the finding of no adverse effect and provides the conditions set by the Texas State Historic Officer's conditions in order for the project to move forward. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Proposed Rehabilitation of North Wing Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the documentation regarding the Department of the Air Force's determination of no adverse effect for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter of review regarding a project in progress at Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation requests that Randolph Air Force Base forward more information describing the undertaking and the current status of construction. This correspondence is part of a group of letters and attachments relating to the proposed rehabilitation of Building 216 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Correspondence is between Randolph Air Force Base and the Advisory...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Building 675 A Wing, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has received and reviewed documentation sent by Randolph Air Force Base concerning the proposed project to rehabilitate the A Wing of Building 675. The Advisory Council agrees with the determination of no adverse effect on the historic property. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and documentation regarding the proposed rehabilitation of Building 675 "A" Wing at Randolph Air Force Base, a property eligible for listing on the National...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Rehabilitation of Hangar 13, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed Randolph Air Force Base's documentation on the determination of no adverse effect for the proposed interior rehabilitation of Hangar 13. The Council agrees with the determination but writes this letter with detailed recommendations and concerns. This letter is part of correspondence and summary documentation on a proposed rehabilitation of Hangar 13, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes the renovation of the interior,...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Joseph Logan, Window Replacement Project Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the information on the proposed replacement of eighty original exterior windows in Building 661at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter addresses the Advisory Council's questions concerning the building's inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and requests Randolph to provide the associated documentation. This letter is part of a group of notes and letters on the proposed rehabilitation and replacement of the eighty...
-
Response from Claudia Nissley to Richard Booher, Proposed Cleaning and Stabilization of Building 614, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Council has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston’s letter and documentation supporting their determination that the stabilization of Building 614, a structure gutted by a previous fire, would have no adverse effect to the building or to the historic district. While the Council commends the Army for retaining the perimeter walls of a building that contributes to the district's historic character, they find the documentation insufficient to permit comment at this time.
-
Response from Curtis Tunnell to Elton Prewitt, Camp Bullis Investigations, Report, and Related Correspondence, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Letter from the Texas Historical Commission addressing Prewitt & Associates, Inc.'s concerns about department coordination and missed scope of projects. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Michael Mocek, T.R. Fehrenbach, Karl A. Komatsu, and Jack D. Eaton.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
After touring Building 526 and reviewing the summary information on the proposed undertakings at Randolph Air Force Base, the Texas Historical Commission proposes that rather than demolishing the historic structure, it should be used as a storage facility as long as it is usable. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 581, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission writes this letter after reviewing the propped project for Building 581 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The Commission has determined that the undertaking will have no adverse effect and have given approval to the plans as drawn.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to Emmitt Smith, Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A set of annotated copies of a letter by the Texas Historical Commission concerning a proposed project at Building 661, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The notes written on these copies are part of an internal correspondence at Randolph Air Force Base, discussing the process of Section 106 coordination.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Armory Building Construction, Camp Bullis, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed information submitted by Fort Sam Houston on the proposed construction of an Armory Building within Camp Bullis. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 guidelines.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 131 50 Percent Level Plans, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans at the 50% level for the rehabilitation of Building 131 at Fort Sam Houston. It appears from the plans that a determination of "no adverse effect" will be determined, after a tour of the site by the Commission.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 2194 Water Plant, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission a proposal to renovate the interior of the Water Plant, Building 2194. This letter outlines the steps required to mitigate the proposed undertaking that would allow a determination of "no adverse effect." Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger (Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston) and David Brigham (Fort Sam Houston).
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Building 2792 Wallpaper and Paint, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's proposal to wallpaper and paint the hallways in Building 2792. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no effect" on the historic structure.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Buildings 122, 124, and 125, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's alterations to Buildings 122, 124, and 125. All of the Commission's recommendations have been followed. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no adverse effect" in accordance with Section 106 Guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Ceiling Fans in Fifteen Quarters on Staff Post, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted an information package to the Texas Historical Commission on the installation of ceiling fans in fifteen quarters on Staff Post. The Commission concurs with the determination of "no adverse effect" and request that the ceiling fans be simple in design. Copied to this correspondence is David Brigham, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank 95 Percent Plans, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received and reviewed the 95% level plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston in their determination of "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Design of Eisenhower National Bank, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed plans for the addition to the Eisenhower National Bank at Fort Sam Houston. The Commission has determined that the design will have "no adverse effect" to the District and to the historic properties around the area. Carbon copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Form 1391 for Building 2376 Beach Pavilion, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter confirms that the Texas Historical Commission received from Fort Sam Houston the form 1391 Report to be submitted to the U.S. Army Command to initiate funding for the project on Building 2376, Beach Pavilion. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Officers' Club Alterations Proposal, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter is in response to the proposed alterations to the Officers’ Club at Fort Sam Houston. Per the Texas Historical Commission’s visit on April 13, 1994, with Kinnison and Associates and with Michael Hilger, the Commission is enclosing its recommendations as well as determination of effect to the structure. Much of the undertaking involves mechanical upgrading of the mechanical system and some asbestos abatement. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort...
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Raven Room Canopy Installation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Fort Sam Houston submitted to the Texas Historical Commission the proposal to install a canopy over the entrance to the Raven Room at the Officers' Club. The Commission concurs with the determination of "adverse effect." This letter gives the Commission's recommendations for alterations to the proposal.
-
Response from Demetrio Jimenez to John Brenneman, Temporary Building, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1994)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed information submitted by Fort Sam Houston regarding the proposed installation of a relocatable building. The Commission concurs with Fort Sam Houston's determination of "no effect" in accordance with Section 106 guidelines. Copied to this correspondence is Mike Hilger, Preservation Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Confirmation of Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter confirming a phone conversation in relation to the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning...
-
Response from Department of the Air Force to Naval Civilian Personnel Data System Center, Initial Request for Construction of Additional Office Space, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter reviewing the possibility of additional office space be provided to accommodate approximately fifteen additional personnel in Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning an undertaking enclose exposed arches with glass on the second floor of the west wing of Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Included will be the lowering of the porch ceiling to accommodate air conditioning duct work.
-
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition and Replacement of Building 2791, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the demolition and replacement of Building 2791, a Category I property located within the proposed expansion of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The information provided by Fort Sam Houston did not include an analysis of alternatives that may avoid or minimize the potential adverse effect of this undertaking. The Council requests that Fort Sam Houston inform the Society for...
-
Response from Don Klima to John Brenneman, Demolition of Building 238, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (1997)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has received and reviewed the Army's adverse effect notice regarding the proposed demolition of Building 238, a Category I property located within the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Council is interested in the opinions of the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, and the San Antonio Conservation Society regarding the disposition and treatment of...
-
Response from Don Klima to Leonard Patrick, Building 900 Construction of Exterior Elevator, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has reviewed the Air Force's no adverse effect determination for the proposed construction of an exterior elevator at Building 900, Randolph Air Force Base, TX. The Council does not agree with the Air Force's determination and has declared an adverse effect on the historic property. This letter explains in detail the Council's decision. This letter is part of correspondence discussing a proposed undertaking to construct an exterior elevator in the...
-
Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Building 902 Alterations, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1991)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
A letter requesting a meeting between Randolph Air Force Base and the Texas Historical Commission staff to coordinate and discuss the proposed rehabilitation of Building 902. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.
-
Response from Donald Peterson to Curtis Tunnell, Renovation of Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1992)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter states the cooperation of Randolph Air Force Base with the Texas Historical Commission in coordinating undertakings, including projects involving doors and windows.
-
Response from Douglas Biggerstaff to Lawerence Oaks, Lease of Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Department of the Army at Fort Sam Houston has received the Texas Historical Commission's correspondence regarding the lease of Building 259. The letter is Fort Sam Houston's review and response to the Commission's comments. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical Commission and Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston review each other's comments and a draft of the lease agreement os included.
-
Response from Elizabeth Butman to Michael Grizer, Project Review of Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 133, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2012)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission review staff, led by Elizabeth Butman, has completed its review of project documentation received on January 17, 2012. Based on this material, the proposed undertaking consists of the rehabilitation of Building 133 for use as courthouse for the Staff Judge Advocate. This building is listed in the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District. The Commission found that the proposed changes do not meet the...
-
Response from Elton Prewitt to James Steely, PAI Reports of Investigations No. 75, Camp Bullis, Texas (1990)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence citing need for better coordination between departments in the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from Emmitt Smith to Curtis Tunnell, Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1993)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
Correspondence including three engineering studies conducted on Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a packet of correspondence concerning the proposed demolition of Building 526, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Attachments include engineering reports, description, and location map.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Allen Benefield, Project Review for Cold War-Era Building and Structure Inventory and Assessment, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff from the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bob Brinkman, has reviewed the submitted information and concur with the determinations of eligibility including that of Building 40 and Building 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Bruce R. Nadler, Project Review of New Canopy and Alterations to Hangar 63, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (2004)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The review staff at the Texas Historical Commission, led by Bradford Patterson, has completed its review of the proposed alterations to Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed alterations will have no adverse effect on Hangar 63 or its National Historic Landmark District.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Colonel Patrick, Project Review of Flagstone Sidewalks, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas (1999)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received a submittal from Randolph Air Force Base to replace the historic flagstone sidewalks with concrete. After review, and because of the sidewalks' installation in the 1930s, the Commission sees the existing flagstone sidewalks as a contributor to the character of the district and their replacement with concrete does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The standards...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Determination for Rehabilitation of Building 128 (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received further correspondence from Fort Sam Houston regarding the undertaking for Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and the proposed changes to Building 128 will cause no adverse effect on the historic building or the historic district. Copied to this letter is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 128. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided. This letter details the Commission's concerns and recommendations for the proposed undertakings. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project of Building 2000-2001's rehabilitation. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and requests more information before a final review can be completed of the project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the project to rehabilitate Building 2264. The Commission's review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and have written this letter outlining its concerns. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review for Rehabilitation of Theatre 1 Building 2270, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the project review for the rehabilitation of Theatre #1, Building 2270, at Fort Sam Houston. The review staff has completed its review of the project documentation provided and has determined that sufficient information has not been provided to complete the review of the project. This letter serves as comment and gives a list of requests for correct documentation. Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Project Review Revise for Rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received from Fort Sam Houston further correspondence and revisions for the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2000-2001. This letter seres as additional comment and lists concerns on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Guilietti, Texas Historical Commission, Division of Architecture.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to David Brigham, Rehabilitation of Building 128, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the rehabilitation of Building 128. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking including proposed changes from the State Historic Preservation Officer.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas A. Biggerstaff, Project Review for the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking of the Lease of Buildings 1000, 2371, and 2372 from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Draft Memorandum of Agreement for the Demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102, Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the draft Memorandum of Agreement for the demolition of Buildings 376, 377, 4115, and 5102. The Commission approves of the draft MOA, but requests specific language be used in Stipulation I (detailed in this letter). Copied to this correspondence is Jill Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nichols (Bexar County...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Environmental Assessment Document for New Housing Construction in Patch-Chaffee Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed the environmental assessment from Fort Sam Houston for proposed new housing construction in the Patch-Chaffee Area at Fort Sam Houston. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Memorandum of Agreement Building 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received from Fort Sam Houston correspondence describing Building 5002. After review, the Commission has signed the Memorandum of Agreement submitted for the demolition of Building 5002 at Camp Bullis.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, MOA on Demolition of Building 1030, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's request for a signature of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to allow the demolition of Building 1030. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission is specifically writing to halt the demolition of Building 1030 since the MOA originally allowing the undertaking was signed in error.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Building 1030 HABS Documentation, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the undertaking for Building 1030. The Commission has reviewed the documentation provided an agrees that it fulfills Fort Sam Houston's obligation to provide HABS documentation per the Memorandum of Agreement concerning the proposed demolition of the historic property.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Construction of Dining Facility within Conservation District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's correspondence regarding the proposed construction of a dining facility. By applying the Section 106 criteria, the Commission has determined the proposed project meets the guidelines of "no adverse effect."
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for NEPA Final Draft Including Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, as well as their associated Memorandum of Agreement. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anna McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Pending Environmental Assessment of Proposed Access Control Measures, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the pending environmental assessment of proposed access control measures. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Ann McClone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Buildings 238 and 240. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking and its associating MOA from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Anne McGlone (City of San Antonio Preservation Office), Joan Gaither (Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston), Jill...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed New Bollards to Replace Temporary Barriers, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the proposed new bollards to replace temporary barriers. After review, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the National Landmark District under the condition that the bollards are similar, but not identical, to historic bollards in the district.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has consulted with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Council concurred with the Commission that this proposed undertaking does not fall under Emergency Situations, therefore, the Commission has 30 days to comment on the proposal.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Security Gate in Old Austin Road/Dickman Area, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed security gate in the Old Austin Road/Dickman Area. The Commission has reviewed the undertaking and has determined that the proposed gate will have no adverse effect as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Switching Facility in Expanded NHL District, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed new switching facility near the old Brooke Army Medical Center. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the proposed undertaking will have no adverse effect on the expanded Historic Landmark District.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Building 5101, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking to demolish the building - specifically a request to incorporate the historic building into a new proposed dining facility, rather than demolish Building 5101. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review for Proposed Undertaking to Demolish Buildings 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 5101 and Building 5002. This letter serves as further comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. This letter is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's proposed undertaking to demolish Building 5101 and 5002, Camp Bullis, Texas.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Rehabilitation of Building 2264, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2001)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's latest information package for the Rehabilitation of Building 2264. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Commission states that the proposal, as presented, is not at a stage of development to make a formal determination of effect on the building and requests complete plans when they are...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Project Review of Report for the Stabilization of the Gift Chapel Building 2200, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed Fort Sam Houston's submittal of the report for the stabilization of the Gift Chapel. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposal for Privatization of Water Supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis, Texas (2000)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received and reviewed a letter from Fort Sam Houston requesting a determination of effect for the privatization of the water supply of Fort Sam Houston and Camp Bullis on National Register eligible Buildings 3186, 2600, 2194, 6210, 6211, and HLF: L-28. This letter serves as comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Proposed Demolition of Buildings 238 and 240, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 238 and 240. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and requests photographic documentation for both buildings in order for the review to proceed. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have outlined their recommendations. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. This letter is part of correspondence reviewing the lease agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The Texas Historical...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreement for Building 259, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2003)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing Building 259. The Commission's staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and have determined that it will have no adverse effect on the historic property. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic Preservation Officer), and Virginia S. Nicholas (Bexar County Historical Commission).
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Douglas Biggerstaff, Review of Lease Agreements for Brooke Army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion North and South Buildings, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2002)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received Fort Sam Houston's correspondence describing the Brooke army Medical Center and Beach Pavilion. The Commission staff has reviewed the proposed undertaking and this letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historic Commission. Copied to this correspondence is Jill Harrison Souter (San Antonio Conservation Society), Ann McGlone (San Antonio Historic...
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for 65 Percent Construction Document Submittal for Proposed Rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed rehabilitation of Building 2270 Theater 1. After review, the Commission has determined that the project will have no adverse effect on the historic theater. Copied to this correspondence is Michael Pumphrey, Historical Architect, Fort Sam Houston.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330, due to PCE contamination. This letter serves a comment on the proposed undertaking and includes the signed amendment to the Memorandum associated with this undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio Conservation Society, and the City of San Antonio Historic Preservation Office.
-
Response from F. Lawerence Oaks to Garry Atkins, Project Review for Proposed Demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination, Fort Sam Houston, Texas (2005)
DOCUMENT Full-Text
The Texas Historical Commission has received correspondence from Fort Sam Houston describing the proposed demolition of Building 330 Due to PCE Contamination. After review of the documentation provided, the Commission has determined that the subject undertaking will require an amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission.